Preview

Advantages Of The Insanity Plea

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
251 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Advantages Of The Insanity Plea
To be considered insane and mentally unstable, I believe a criminal defendant must be unconsciously aware of their actions and there should be no prior intentional plan planned out to commit a crime or felony. However in some cases, criminal defendant has used the insanity plea as a defense, in which they have thought out and did intend on executing the crime as a result of mental illness. Even though some people are right about abolishing this legal defense because some defendant may take this as an advantage and hopefully be declared as not guilty, I still believe that the insanity plea is still an essential part of a rational criminal justice system. According to Psychology Today, the insanity plea has been used less than 1% of all the
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The Insanity Defense
    • 970 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The Insanity Defense

    The insanity defense is one of the several legal questions that might be raised in a criminal case. This type of defense in a criminal case focuses on the defendant’s cognitive and mental state at the time of the offense. Due to this speculation, the questions focuses on whether the defendant is criminally responsible for his or her behavior due to the mental state at the time of the offense (Hugaboom, 2002). Also, additional questions are required to determine psychological evidence might also be included in the case. The psychological issues will include the defendant’s competency to stand trial, the mental conditions that are relevant in consideration of the sentencing, and competency to waive rights. According to Hugaboom (2002), insanity…

    • 970 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Summary Of Dennis Pozniak's Insanity Case
    • 1368 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Summary Of Dennis Pozniak's Insanity Case

    This means that the guilty individual receives the fairest possible sentence. A comparison to another insanity defense used, was the case of the Esposita brothers who had clearly faked being insane to get out of a death sentence. The Esposita brothers set a plan to gain money through robbery and were well equipped to take lives if anyone stood in the way. Both brothers were charged for murder of police officers and citizens. During their court trial, the Esposita brothers pretended to show signs of insanity by speaking in gibberish and banging their heads against the table. The jury was not convinced due to lack of evidence showing past history of insanity and had sentenced them to death by electrocution in 1942. This is one of many cases where a criminal had attempted to get out of a deserving consequence by using the insanity defense. Although it is rarely the case, some criminals convince the judge that they truly are insane when in fact, they were simply successful in fooling the judge. In comparison to the case of Dennis Pozniak who clearly was insane, it was determined that there was no benefit to the actions performed by Dennis and it was simply a spontaneous event that was brought due to an insane state of mind. Is it fair for an individual to get out of their deserved consequence simply because they convinced the judge that they are insane? I believe that unless the…

    • 1368 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Proposition 27: Special Prosecution
    • 573 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Proposition 27: Special Prosecution

    He states that it directly attacks the mens rea requirement. Hence if a criminal was to plead NGRI (Not Guilty by Reason of Insanity) they have thereby eliminated the possibility that they could have had the mental capacity to commit the crime. However, in an article written by Kenneth B. Chiacchia for Psychology Encyclopedia, it is noted that less than 1 out of every 100 defendants plead NGRI. The actual statistic is .85%. Additionally, the statistics state that nearly 70% of those defendants who did plead NGRI withdrew their plea after they were found to be mentally sane. The high-profile cases that really grab the headlines are the cases that skew the public view of the NGRI defense and sit atop the “wedding cake”. Essentially, the defense is not used often and when it is used an extremely small fraction of defendants actually go through with the defense. By limiting the use of the defense, the crime rate should decrease in theory because persons intending on committing crimes will know prior to the act that they will not be able to plead…

    • 573 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Mcnaughton's Defense: The Insanity Defense
    • 295 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Mcnaughton's Defense: The Insanity Defense

    The insanity defense is not covered as its own constitutional right, although it faults under the due process clause in the 5th and 14th amendments. The states define their own elements for what constitutes insanity, using the common law as a guideline. Mens rea—Latin for the “guilty mind” — is one of the necessary elements for insanity. If found incompetent, the person is usually charged to…

    • 295 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Eddie Routh Case Study
    • 803 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Eddie Routh Case Study

    The insanity defense is only raised in 1% of cases and then only successful 25% of the time it is used; although its rarity, the legal court has very detailed rules. Most rules describe not guilty by reason of insanity as not being aware of what you were doing in that exact moment. Adam Banner suggests that the Eddie Routh case had an accurate ruling of guilty because of his claim that, “...the disposition is ‘not guilty by reason of insanity’. It is not ‘not guilty by reason of mental illness’,”. Only Mental Health America would disagree, stating, “The Court has indicated that states may be required to provide at least some minimal defense based on mental illness,”. Coincidently, these changes have not been made thus…

    • 803 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Pros And Cons Of Plea Bargaining
    • 177 Words
    • 1 Page

    Pros And Cons Of Plea Bargaining

    Plea Bargaining has become a major factor in our criminal justice system. Like all controversial topics there are many pros and cons that make it hard to decide what is right and wrong about the situation. I personally feel that plea bargaining should be abolished. Plea bargains are creating harm to our criminal justice system. Due to plea bargains the criminal justice system is being undermined and losing control of what is happening to criminals.…

    • 177 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Pros And Cons Of Plea Bargaining
    • 1064 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Pros And Cons Of Plea Bargaining

    Even though there are many advantage there are also many disadvantages. The biggest disadvantage is that when you take a plea bargain it is an automatic admission of guilt. You waive your right to have your trial heard by a jury and a judge. And, even though a plea bargain was offered and accepted, the court can decline the plea bargain which would put the case back on the docket to be heard by a jury. So an admission of guilt not only stays with you forever, it also takes away the right to file for an appeal in your…

    • 1064 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Pros And Cons Of Plea Bargaining
    • 626 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Pros And Cons Of Plea Bargaining

    The question we are debating today is whether or not plea-bargaining undermines the Criminal justice system? The job of the Criminal justice system is to protect the citizens of the United States. How are we protecting them if we give criminals shorter sentences than they deserve? When we plea bargain we release more criminals back into the streets and put citizens of the United States' safety at risk. A plea bargain is an agreement in a criminal case in which a prosecutor and a defendant arrange to settle the case against the defendant. The United states department of justice's mission statement reads: To enforce the law and defend the interests of the United States according to the law; to ensure public safety against threats foreign and domestic; to provide federal leadership in preventing and controlling crime; to seek just punishment for those guilty of unlawful behavior; and to ensure fair and impartial administration of justice for all Americans. This statement is being undermined because not…

    • 626 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Profound Pros And Cons Of The Insanity Defense
    • 553 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Profound Pros And Cons Of The Insanity Defense

    The insanity defense should be allowed for those with a mental illness when they commit a crime since they are not in control of their actions. “If a person really does have mental incapacity, and it will be considered that his condition has caused him to commit a capital crime, which means the defense could save his life. Put in mind that a capital crime carries a punishment of eventual death. However, being found not guilty because of insanity means that a capital punishment is out of the question. It could mean that the accused would just be housed at a professional mental health treatment center. Though it might not be jail, still it gets him off the streets,” (12 Profound Pros and Cons of the Insanity Defense [Web log post]. (n.d.). Retrieved May 16,…

    • 553 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Examples Of Mental Illness In Macbeth
    • 1290 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Examples Of Mental Illness In Macbeth

    For starters, the expression, the courtroom definition, and the psychiatrist term of the word “insanity” are all different and all have different connotations. In order to be considered insane in today’s court, you have to be completely separated from reality. As described by Vaknin, “A perpetrator should go unpunished - and be hospitalized instead - only if he is found to be completely divorced from reality by diagnosticians from both sides, a far cry from today’s insanity defense” (2). To prove that a suspect is in fact separated from reality, a few things have to be proven. The first thing to be proven is if the suspect had a diminished capacity. Macbeth showed that he was mentally impaired when he brought the daggers back instead of putting them with the guards and smothering them with blood. Although he knew that he was killing, he was not stable enough to carry out the entire crime. After the first crime, he could not control his behavior anymore. It became out of hand and he wasn’t able to control it anymore. He felt the urge to kill; which proves that he had an irresistible impulse which could no longer be controlled. In a way, he also lacked criminal intent. While he intended to kill, he did it because he believed that killing the king was what he was meant to do.…

    • 1290 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Plea Bargaining Advantages
    • 519 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Plea Bargaining Advantages

    When criminals are arrested and about to be tried in front of a jury of their peers and a judge, they are most likely will be offered a plea deal. Now this plea deal if it is accepted by the offender will stand as their punishment for the crime committed without having to go through court and trial which in some cases helps to spare the victims from having to testify in front of the person that had wronged them. Rape victims are the ones that are the most beneficial from plea bargaining, they do not have to face the offender that brought them such harm. On another note though these offenders are not serving the time that they would originally be given if gone to trial so the victims feel as though there is an injustice to plea bargaining. People that are harmed want their offenders to serve the most time they can so that they are given time to heal and recover from these inhumane acts of committed against them. “The Bureau of Justice Statistics, after studying partial data on state-court felony prosecutions nationwide, found that from 1986 to 2006 the ratio of pleas to trials nearly doubled.” (Oppel, 2011)…

    • 519 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Dead or Alive: the Criminally Insane
    • 823 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Dead or Alive: the Criminally Insane

    Mental illness is defined as “Any of various conditions characterized by impairment of an individual’s normal cognitive, emotional, or behavioral functioning, and caused by social, psychological, biochemical, genetic, or other factors, such as infection or head trauma” (thefreedictionary.com). A defendant charged with a crime may present the court with an insanity plea. Upon application of the insanity plea, the defendant must be psychologically evaluated. A common test that is used for this evaluation is called the M’Naghten rules. These rules state that “it must be clearly proved that at the time of committing the act the party accused was labouring under such a defect of reason, from disease of mind, as not to know the nature and quality of the act he was doing, or as not to know that what he was doing was wrong” (bailii.org). In using this defence the accused may receive a verdict of “guilty but mentally ill,” which means the accused party may still receive the death penalty. It is extremely rare that an individual using the insanity plea defence gets acquitted.…

    • 823 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Insanity Plea Should Be Allowed
    • 1040 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Insanity Plea Should Be Allowed

    Finally, the insanity plea should not be allowed is because the ability to know if a criminal is insane at the time of the crime is near impossible without creditable witnesses.…

    • 1040 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Essay On Insanity Defense
    • 842 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Essay On Insanity Defense

    The insanity defense, also known as the mental disorder defense, is a defense by excuse in a criminal case, arguing that the defendant is not responsible for their actions due to an episodic or persistent psychiatric disease at the time of the criminal act. The…

    • 842 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Essay On Criminal Defense
    • 429 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Essay On Criminal Defense

    “Disease of the mind”, is any illness, disorder, or abnormal condition which impairs the human mind and its functioning. It excludes temporary conditions of alcohol, drugs, hysteria or concussion. People use this as an excuse to criminal liability because mental illness is covered under section 16 of the Criminal Code. The insanity defense prevents a mentally-incapacitated person from being criminally punished. In order to plea insanity, the courts provide a variety of legal test to help determine the mental state of the offender. The most used test is the M’Naghten rule; which states that an offender is insane if mental illness prevents them from knowing the difference between right and wrong. Another test that states like to use is the “irresistible impulse” test. This test states that “If the defendant is suffering from a mental disease that prevents control of personal conduct, he or she may be adjudged not guilty by reason of insanity, even if he or she knows the difference between right and wrong.” Pleading insanity is by no means a “get out of jail free” card. Most offenders that are found not guilty because of insanity are sent to a mental health institution. They are required to be there for a long period of time, most spend longer in the institution than they would have spent in prison if they had been found…

    • 429 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More

Related Topics