Preview

Advantages and Disadvantages: Federal, Confederate and Unitary Systems of Government!

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
646 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Advantages and Disadvantages: Federal, Confederate and Unitary Systems of Government!
Advantages and disadvantages: Federal, Confederate and Unitary Systems of Government!

The unitary government is often described as a centralized government. It is a government in which all powers held by the government belong to a single, central agency. The majority of all worlds’ governments are Unitary. For example, Great Britain. Some advantages of a Unitary Government are; uniform policies, laws. Enforcement and administration throughout the country. This is a huge beyond huge positive trait of a Unitary Government. Also, there are fewer issues between national and local governments. A unitary Government depicts greater unity and stability too. As far as advantages go, there are disadvantages as well. This government seems to be out of touch with the local concerns, and is quite slow in meeting those problems. This means that the government only serves the minor inconveniences. In all, a Unitary government has its ups and downs, although is a widely used system throughout the entire world. A Confederate Government is an alliance of independent states. A central organ – the confederate government – has the power to handle only those matters that the member states have assigned to it. This type of government system is not used very much today- in fact it is very rare in today’s modern world. The closest government system we have today in the European Union, it is the closest to a confederation presently. The advantages of this system are: Confederate Governments keeps the power at local levels. This prevents the growth of a large central government. It also makes it possible for the several states to cooperate in matters of common concerns and to also retain their separate identities. A confederate government is the type of government where the national government derives its powers from the states. It has the power to handle matters that the member states have assigned to it, and only that. That’s a type of disadvantage as well- a limited power to fix
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Compare And Contrast The Federalist And The Anti-Federalists Dbq
    • 536 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Compare And Contrast The Federalist And The Anti-Federalists Dbq

    In 1787 when the Constitution was created it caused many people to start a grand debate. Of course, there were people that supported the constitution and people that were afraid of the constitution. The Federalists and the Anti-Federalists created documents that are within the Constitution that have shaped United States political parties. The Federalists supported a strong central government because the Articles of Confederation didn’t have strong national power, and was very restrictive.A reason why The Federalist wanted to change the constitution was to add people’s opinion into the Constitution. The Anti-Federalists supported a strong state government because they believed that a strong national government would cause a monarch and they were afraid of who will have the power.…

    • 536 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Chapter Summary: The Road To Disunion
    • 232 Words
    • 1 Page

    Chapter Summary: The Road To Disunion

    This book focuses on the of number southern black and white who opposed the confedecy. He documented in The Road to Disunion, that anti-Confederates got strength from the weakness of slavery in the Border South, while slavery stunted population growth. The author argues that the varying support of the upper and lower South contributed to the fall of the Confederacy placing most of the blame on anti confederalist. He states that anti-Confederate whites undermined the Confederacy by remaining outside the nation while slaves unified form within and enlisted into the Union Army. Both groups guaranteed that the Union would have more men for the army which cause the Confederacy to lose because anti-Confederates waged war against Confederate southerners. That author also discusses the neutrality of the border slave states that made the Confederate war effort vulnerable. Losing nearly half of the slave states neutrality and the support for the Union army's invasion damaged the geography and population that the Confederacy could use for its defense.…

    • 232 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Compare and Contrast the Articles of Confederation and the Constitution of 1787 with Regard: to Powers of Congress, Powers of the Executive, and Powers Vested in the States
    • 603 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Compare and Contrast the Articles of Confederation and the Constitution of 1787 with Regard: to Powers of Congress, Powers of the Executive, and Powers Vested in the States

    Women have always had a dominant role in the prosperity and growth of any community. These roles have changed depending on the time period, geography and race of the people. America had three most important groups of women: the Native Indian, the African, and the European. These three groups came from exceptionally different backgrounds, and played dissimilar roles in their family and community.…

    • 603 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    U.S. History 1 Reconstruction
    • 2576 Words
    • 7 Pages

    U.S. History 1 Reconstruction

    Assignment 5: U.S. History to ReconstructionIn 1861 most Southerners thought that the Confederacy was favorite to win the war. The Confederacy’s sheer size – 750,000 square miles – was a major asset, making if difficult to blockade, occupy and conquer. Confederate forces did not have to invade the North: they simply needed to defend. The fire-power of the rifle-musket meant that battlefield tactics now favored the defender. The Union, having no option but to attack, was bound to suffer heavy casualties. Southerners hoped that Northern opinion might come to question high losses. If Northern will collapsed, the Confederacy would win by default. Geography gave the Confederacy an important strategic advantage. In the crucial theatre of the war – North Virginia – a series of rivers provided a barrier to Union armies intent on capturing Richmond, the Confederate capital. Slavery, which might seem to be a Confederate weakness, enabled the South to enlist more of its white manpower than the North.…

    • 2576 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Examples Of Compromises After The Civil War
    • 159 Words
    • 1 Page

    Examples Of Compromises After The Civil War

    After the Constitution was received by the greater part of the States in 1789, uniting the States into one country, contrasts between the States had been worked out through compromises. By 1861 these contrasts between the Northern States (which incorporated the Mid-Western and Western States) and the Southern States had turned out to be great to the point that compromise would no more work. Along these lines, a contention began inside of our country that was known as the Civil War. This Civil War was absolutely encouraged by the vigorous requests of numerous Northerners for the prompt abrogation of subjugation. Yet, an examination of the occasions driving specifically to war will demonstrate that Southern politicians likewise must share a great…

    • 159 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Anti Federalists Pros And Cons
    • 210 Words
    • 1 Page

    Anti Federalists Pros And Cons

    Anti-Federalists restricted approval of the Constitution and favored the adjustment of power being with the states. They trusted that a capable national government would wind up being overbearing and there will be loss of flexibility, higher assessments, and no power for state laws or courts. The fundamental worry for the Anti-Federalists in the Federalist paper #10 was fairness rights for the general population. It is the reason they affirmed of Article 4, since they bolstered the privileges of the general population and having full confidence and credit given to the states influenced them to feel that the privileges of the states would be maintained. The Anti-Federalists battled for the restriction of ratification in the Constitution just…

    • 210 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Analyze The Consequences Of The North And South After The Civil War
    • 115 Words
    • 1 Page

    Analyze The Consequences Of The North And South After The Civil War

    The Civil War ended in April of 1865, and it left many things behind to be dealt with. There were many issues, and in a lot of them the North and South had different point of views. Although the North was very rich, the South was tremendously poor. Despite the result of the Civil War, the Union acted like they were in control, and the South couldn’t do anything about it. One controversy that the North had was if they should allow the Southern states govern themselves. The North should not let the states in the South lead their own government. It would be too dangerous and would be a major setback toward the North.…

    • 115 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Cooperative Federalism Pros And Cons
    • 398 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Cooperative Federalism Pros And Cons

    Federalism has been renovated to meet modern stability and progress. An advantage for the establishment of federalism include the closer ties between people and government…

    • 398 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    How Does The Constitution Guard Against Tyranny
    • 892 Words
    • 4 Pages

    How Does The Constitution Guard Against Tyranny

    This allows the power of making decisions to be split up between the central government and state governments. The central government deals with foreign affairs, the military, and our economy. The state government deals with things such as school, roads,and everyday affairs. Then, they come together and have jobs they both can do. In short, "the different governments will each control each other, at the same time that each will be controlled by itself," (James Madison, Federalist Paper #51, 1788). Federalism protects against tyranny because it does not allow one government to have too much power. The central government and state government have enough power to make important decisions, yet not enough to have total control. They rule over each other while being able to rule over themselves. It's written in such a brilliant manner where everything is…

    • 892 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Compare And Contrast The Federalist And Anti Federalists
    • 230 Words
    • 1 Page

    Compare And Contrast The Federalist And Anti Federalists

    Federalists were individuals who supported the ratification of the Constitution. Anti-Federalists opposed the Constitution as stated in the book, "the critics of the Constitution were by no means a unified group" (Faragher, 180). I found it interesting that the Constitution was initially influenced by the Federalist model in regards to interpretation but the pendulum has now swung in the opposite direction to a more Anti-Federalist approach (Content 8-2). The Constitution was ratified and the Federalists won for numerous reasons. The Anti-Federalists had delayed representation while the Federalists promised to amend the Constitution to better protect individual's rights (Faragher, 181). Overall, it was the Federalist representation, planning,…

    • 230 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    How Did The Failure Of The United States During The Reconstruction Era
    • 472 Words
    • 2 Pages

    How Did The Failure Of The United States During The Reconstruction Era

    The confederate states wanted to break away from the united states but failed. However, now they had to rejoin the union. The war had left the souths economy and society in destruction. It would take a lot of effort to reestablish states. The remaking of the states was called reconstruction.…

    • 472 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Anti Federalism Pros And Cons
    • 464 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Anti Federalism Pros And Cons

    The draft of the Constitution was submitted to the states by congress in September of 1787. For the first time, the people were able to peacefully vote and discuss how their nation would be governed. Among the people, there were mainly two groups: The federalists and the anti-federalists.…

    • 464 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Pros And Cons Of Federalism
    • 565 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Pros And Cons Of Federalism

    We Federalist’s believe that the government needs to be divided into three parts, with equal powers and balances and checks, for it to work effectively. Now the Anti-Federalist’s believe that we are trying to give all power to the larger states in the North and ignore the needs of our brethren the South states. We are not. We are just trying to create a fair government.…

    • 565 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Why Did The Confederate Win The Civil War Essay
    • 434 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Why Did The Confederate Win The Civil War Essay

    Throughout history, the ability to win a war relied on nationalism. The Confederate States of America was shaped on paper, although this may be true, it did not fully sink into the hearts and minds of the CSA’s potential citizens (Beringer). The documents that were formed to establish a separate country from the U.S. demanded more from the would-be citizens than it had to offer. With this being said, Nationalism played a key role in the American Civil War because many soldiers harbored conflicting notions of…

    • 434 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Disadvantages Of The Union And Confederacy
    • 343 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Disadvantages Of The Union And Confederacy

    The Union and Confederacy both had advantages and disadvantages. The North had better advantages because they had a higher populace, more industry, and better assets than the South. It had a better banking system that they could rely upon to help them raise money for the fight. Furthermore, the North had more ships and a had a proficient and larger railroad framework. On the other hand, the South had the benefit of fighting in a familiar region protecting their property, homes, and families. Another favorable position that the South had was having that military training background on the battle field. The disadvantage that happened in the North were attempting to take the Southerners back to the Union, and by doing that they would need to attack and hold the South in their intimidating populace. The South faced material disadvantages. They had a smaller population of free man to manufacture an armed force. It had a couple of facilities to help distribute weapons, food, and other supplies. The South experienced issues conveying food, weapons, and supplies to…

    • 343 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More

Related Topics