Preview

ACT 5733 Spring 2015 HW 2 Solutions

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
933 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
ACT 5733 Spring 2015 HW 2 Solutions
ACT 5733 – Advanced Managerial Accounting
Spring 2015
HW #2 KEY

Question #1
Consider the following potential investment, which has the same risk as the firm’s other projects:
Time
CF
Cumulative
PV
0
($175,000)
($175,000)
($175,000)
1
$46,000
($129,000)
$41,818
2
$50,000
($79,000)
$41,322
3
$53,000
($26,000)
$39,820
4
$54,000
$28,000
$36,883
5
$55,000
$83,000
$34,151

Discount rate
10%

$18,994

Payback
3.49
years

NPV
$18,994

IRR
14.03%

a) What are the investment’s payback period, IRR, and NPV, assuming the firm’s WACC is 10%? SEE TABLE

b) If the firm requires a payback period of less than 4 years, should this project be accepted? Be sure to justify your choice. Yes, since the payback of 3.49 is less than the maximum of 4 years.

c) Based on the IRR and NPV rules, should this project be accepted? Be sure to justify your choice. Yes, since NPV > 0 and IRR > discount rate.

d) Which of the decision rules (payback, NPV, or IRR) do you think is the best rule for a firm to use when evaluating projects? Be sure to justify your choice.
NPV is best as it has an objective decision rule, uses all cash flows, is based on cash flows (not income), can incorporate multiple discount rates, and is not biased toward smaller projects. The IRR also has an objective decision rule, uses all cash flows, and is based on cash flows, but it cannot incorporate multiple rates, can be biased toward smaller projects, and sometimes results in multiple answers. Payback is relatively straight forward, but it ignore cash flows occurring after payback is reached and does not have an objective decision rule.
Question #2
A firm believes it can generate an additional $600,000 per year in revenues for the next 6 years if it replaces existing equipment that is no longer usable with new equipment that costs $460,000. The existing equipment is fully depreciated and has a market value of $4,000. The firm expects to be able to sell the new equipment when it is finished using

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Clark Paints

    • 275 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Payback is calculated by dividing the initial investment by the annual cash inflow. The payback period is when the cumulative net cash inflows begin to exceed the cumulative net cash outflows. If an investment involves uneven cash flows, the computation requires scheduling cash inflows and outflows. Hence payback period is the duration in which initial investments are recovered. Here the payback period is very low and its 3.7 years which is good for the project.…

    • 275 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Finance Work

    • 424 Words
    • 2 Pages

    For the following projects, compute NPV, IRR, MIRR, profitability index, and payback. If these projects are mutually exclusive, which one(s) should be done? If they are independent, which one(s) should be undertaken?…

    • 424 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Energy Gel Case Study

    • 455 Words
    • 2 Pages

    We also see here that they chose to use the payback period and ROIC in order to evaluate the project. A more accurate tool to use for this evaluation would have been either NPV or IRR.…

    • 455 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Victoria Chemicals

    • 788 Words
    • 4 Pages

    (2) Payback period evaluates how long the project is going to take to reach break-even point.…

    • 788 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    We should accept the project because of the positive NPV and high IRR. We will gain $532 million in wealth which is a big money on the scale like this. The company has a bond rating of AA that makes the risk relatively low. So we should definitely say yes.…

    • 1113 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    a. Using NPV, conduct a straight financial analysis of the investment alternatives and rank the projects. Which NPV of the three should be used?…

    • 1409 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The NPV of this project is negative and the IRR is lower then the Cost of Capital (12%)…

    • 1666 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Assignment 11

    • 2801 Words
    • 24 Pages

    One advantage of the payback method for evaluating potential investments is that it provides some information about a project's liquidity and risk.…

    • 2801 Words
    • 24 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Dilemma at Day Pro

    • 2823 Words
    • 10 Pages

    The payback period can be defined as the length of time it takes before the cumulated stream of forecasted cash flows equal the initial investment (Arnold 2007). By looking at Appendicle A1.0 and A1.1 we can see that the "Epoxy Resin" project has a payback period of 1.5 years while Synthetic Resin has a longer payback period of 2.5 years. On the basis of this methodology we will choose to invest in Epoxy Resin.…

    • 2823 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Quiz #2

    • 278 Words
    • 3 Pages

    4. A 4‐year project has an initial asset investment of $306,600, and initial net working capital investment…

    • 278 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Corporate Finance

    • 1266 Words
    • 6 Pages

    4. The decision rule for net present value is to: C. Accept all projects with positive net present values…

    • 1266 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    9-3 Jojo is reviewing a project with an initial cash outflow of RM250,000. An additional RM100,000 will have to be invested after the first year, followed by an additional investment of RM50,000 at the end of the second year. Beginning at the end of year three, the project is expected to generate cash flows of RM90,000 per year for the next eight years. Calculate the project’s payback period, net present value (NPV), and internal rate of return (IRR) at a cost of capital of 8 percent.…

    • 499 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Project Appraisal

    • 946 Words
    • 4 Pages

    (B) Teja international is determining the cash flow for a project involving replacement of an old machine by a new machine. The old machine bought a few years ago has a book…

    • 946 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Business Finance

    • 291 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Q1. Please compare the advantages and disadvantages of the following investment rules: Net Present Value (NPV), Payback Period, Discounted Payback Period, Average Accounting Return, Internal Rate of Return (IRR) and Profitability Index (PI). (You can start by considering the following questions for each investment rule: Does it use cash flows or accounting earnings? Does it consider all cash flows or not? Does it apply a proper discount rate? Whether the acceptance criteria are clear and reasonable? In what situation it can be applied? What kind of weakness does it have?) (4 points)…

    • 291 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Both projects have positive NPVs and IRRs above the firm's cost of capital. Lathe A, however, exceeds the maximum payback period requirement. Because it is so close to the 4-year maximum and this is an unsophisticated capital budgeting technique, Lathe A should not be eliminated from consideration on this basis alone, particularly since it has a much higher NPV.…

    • 476 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays