Poverty foster crime 3
Academic Research Essay: Does Poverty Foster Crime?
Whether poverty fosters crimes remains a continued source of contention politicians, socialists, economists, psychologist as well as members of the general public. On the one hand, opponents of the debate claim that the problem of crime in the society should be qualified as the consulted outcome of poor structural on security and reliable mechanisms for the nurturing and safeguarding of responsible citizens (Regoli, et al., 2009). On the other hand, proponents in the debate assert of the far-reaching effects of poverty in negating the socioeconomic wellbeing of the people as well as the ability by the government to engage in effective security measures (Kriesberg, 2009). All in all, given evidence of a strong link between poverty andinability by individuals to engage in useful activities, there is no doubt that poverty foster crime. This paper is a critical argument in support of the view that poverty foster crime.
Poverty foster crime.
The proposition that poverty promote crime finds rationale thanks to a number of reasons. On the one hand, poverty is to be blamed for prompting the culture of idleness among members of the community. Humans always engage in pursuing some form of activities as a means for spending their energy. On the other hand, it is a common consensus that an idle mind is the devils workshop. Based on this reasoning, failure by individual members of the community to find useful activities to spend their time in implies their elevated risk of engaging in destructive activities (Winfree & Abadinsky, 2009). This is true given the fact that poverty is a root cause to the problem of chronic unemployment. Increased levels of poverty translate toreduced chances for securing sustainable socioeconomic growth and development in the community and hence promoting the culture of idleness (Winfree & Abadinsky, 2009). In addition, the claimed link between the problem of poverty and increased crime rates in the society can be explained by assessing the impact of poverty on access to quality education and hence the socioeconomic future wellbeing of the people. True to the letter, education has been qualified as a fundamental factor of consideration in defining the competitive future social and economic wellbeing by individuals in our modern society. Indeed, academic certifications are increasingly becoming a common requirement for securing employment opportunities in the society regardless of the type of job position(Harrison, 2012). This is further complemented by the fact that the problem of unemployment leads to the problem of idleness by individuals and hence the problem of crime. Of particular significance here, poverty is deemed as a compromise to the ability by children to access quality and reliable education.
According to available literature, on the effect of poverty on education, students from poor neighborhoods or communities comprise the majority population in public schools in our nation. On the other hand, evidence has it that public schools in our society and especially urban schools are marked with chronic issues such as over-population by students, lack of sufficient or reliable learning resources, and shortage of teaching staff. As a result of these problems, urban public schools in our society have remained a common platform for poor student performance, high rate of school dropout, and the nurturing of irresponsible youths in the society (Serr, 2006). This has the ultimate implication that the quality of education offered to our children impacts much on their development into responsible and socially and economically valuable individuals both locally and nationally.
On the contrary however, the problem of poverty significantly impacts negatively on the ability by children to secure quality education...