Your birth was no mistake or mishap, and your life is no fluke of nature. Your parents may not have planned you, but God did. He was not at all surprised by your birth. In fact, he expected it. Long before you were conceived by your parents, you were conceived in the mind of God. He thought of you first. It was not fate, nor chance, nor luck, nor coincidence that you are breathing at this very moment. You are alive because God wanted to create you! The Bible says, “The Lord will fulfill His purpose for me.” Romans 122:2 (NIV)
Abortion is the termination of pregnancy before birth, resulting in, or accompanied by, the death of the fetus. It has become one of the most widely debated ethical issues of our time. Considering what is ethical and what is legal in terms of abortion becomes very complex. The ethical concerns that revolved around the abortion issue are those that encompass a great many ideals – both religious and personal – that have to do with an individual’s concept of right and wrong. To some, the ethical implications mean allowing the woman her right to choose; to others, it is no different than murder.
Do you consider something with a beating heart a living creature? Likely, before a woman even has knowledge of being pregnant, at five weeks, a baby’s heart forms and starts beating. Therefore that would make abortion a form of murder. Murder is classified as taking another human life. The baby that is growing inside of a woman is dependant on her, so when she makes the choice to end the baby’s life, she is making the choice to murder another human. Our federal government must take a stand against the murder of an innocent human. Allowing abortions, including partial birth abortions and embryonic stem cell research is a step in the wrong direction.
All of the controversy around this issue is because it encompasses a vast combination of one's constitutional rights, moral issues, religious beliefs and political preferences. Though the legal history of abortion is relatively short, it is complicated and continues to be actively debated and pursued by activists on both sides of the argument: pro-choice activists are refocusing their fight to achieve greater access to abortions for all women and pro-life activists, while combating these new pro-abortion pursuits, continue to fight for an overturning of the original decision that led to the legalization of abortion, Roe vs. Wade.
Few Americans had any knowledge of the Roe vs. Wade case until the Supreme Court announced its decision on January 22, 1973. Most lawyers would date Roe’s beginning to March 3, 1970, when a young lawyer named Linda Coffee (Irons, P. 2006) entered the federal courthouse in Dallas, Texas, and filed a complaint for “Jane Roe” against Henry Wade, the county’s district attorney, seeking to block enforcement of the state’s abortion law. Historians would look back to 1854, when the Texas legislature made abortion a criminal offence except to save a pregnant woman’s life. Another perspective looks back at July 20, 1962. On that day, a twenty-nine-year old pregnant woman named Sherri Finkbine received a call from her doctor, warning that she faced a high risk of having a badly deformed baby. She had been treating daily headaches with pills that her husband had brought back from England. Sherri had recently read an article about an epidemic of deformed babies in England. Their mothers had taken a medication called thalidomide for headaches and morning sickness. She wondered if the pills she had been taken could be the same.
She checked with her doctor and he confirmed her worst fears. Her doctor showed her and her husband pictures of thalidomide babies with no arms or legs. These pictures led her to her decision to have an abortion. Arizona’s law only allowed abortions if continuing the pregnancy might endanger the...