A Theory Of Justice Rawls Analysis
“the observance of treaties; respect for the freedom and equality of all peoples and for human rights; the “duty of nonintervention” and a prohibition on war other than for self-defense; and the “duty to assist other peoples living under unfavorable conditions that prevent their having a just or decent political and social regime.” These principles are the outcome of the second original position among “parties who chose the veil of ignorance that impedes them from knowing their population size and strength of people whom they represent.” In his book, A Theory of Justice, Rawls indicates “how justices as fairness can be extended to international law for the limits of judging the motivations of just war.” In doing so Rawls expounds that the
…show more content…
This is a fair undertaking as it is between people. The idea of original position is to set up a fair procedure so that any principles agreed will be just. Rawls uses the notion of pure procedural as a basis of the theory of justice. All this also accords with the idea that a constitutional regime must establish an effective Law of Peoples in order to realize fully the freedom of its citizens of the state. “The political philosophy can be realistically an ideal perfection when it extents to what one normally think of to be the limits of practicable politically possibility.” Our hope of the future of the society in which we live rest on the believe that the social world allows reasonably just constitutional democracy existing as a member of a reasonably just Society of Peoples. In a Society of Peoples, “the parallel to reasonable pluralism is the diversity among reasonable peoples with their different cultural background and traditions of thought, both religious and nonreligious. Even when two or more peoples have liberal constitutional regimes, their conceptions of constitutionalism may diverge and express different variations of liberalism.” . As Rawls says, “The Law of Peoples must be acceptable to reasonable peoples who are thus diverse; and it must be fair between them and
This is a fair undertaking as it is between people. The idea of original position is to set up a fair procedure so that any principles agreed will be just. Rawls uses the notion of pure procedural as a basis of the theory of justice. All this also accords with the idea that a constitutional regime must establish an effective Law of Peoples in order to realize fully the freedom of its citizens of the state. “The political philosophy can be realistically an ideal perfection when it extents to what one normally think of to be the limits of practicable politically possibility.” Our hope of the future of the society in which we live rest on the believe that the social world allows reasonably just constitutional democracy existing as a member of a reasonably just Society of Peoples. In a Society of Peoples, “the parallel to reasonable pluralism is the diversity among reasonable peoples with their different cultural background and traditions of thought, both religious and nonreligious. Even when two or more peoples have liberal constitutional regimes, their conceptions of constitutionalism may diverge and express different variations of liberalism.” . As Rawls says, “The Law of Peoples must be acceptable to reasonable peoples who are thus diverse; and it must be fair between them and