As the production of a company increases, the workers sense of worth decreases. A political economy is supported by laws, land, wages and profits of labour without demonstrating their existence or connections. A laborer works for a wage that allows companies to produce a product that is then sold for a profit. Hence the laborer is a part of the process and becomes a commodity himself. The labour is objectified, and the worker is a slave to his labour. This brings about alienation for the laborer and his inner growth isn't realized. He becomes separated from himself and exists only as a worker who is lacking in personal worth. This also related inversely to an increase in a products worth. As the product becomes more important, the …show more content…
The manifesto embraces class conflict and seeks to write the workers against the capitalists. Society has always been arranged into a class order by which every man defines his rank or standing in society. As new lands were discovered, and colonization took place, commerce was established. Trading in commodities fueled industry. The demands for goods increased and the industrial revolution allowed men to redefine his relationship with society. With demand for goods comes more demand for production and the trade or sale of commodities. With such an increase in population, production and commodities, the bourgeoisie's power is compromised. The working class continues to be exploited and is further alienated in its attempts to keep up with the industry. Marx doesn't go into much detail about how Communists would run the economy. In the first part of the manifesto, Marx explains how society started off as communal but as time went on society has become more unequal. The Manifesto is a brief political summary rather than economic, of what Communism is about. It lacks concise, specific information on what Communist ideologies and economic theories