A Rose For Emily And Metamorphosis Comparison Essay
The protagonists of the stories “A Rose for Emily” by William Faulkner’s and “The Metamorphosis” by Franz Kafka’s have a few things in common. Both Mrs. Emily and Gregor experience transformation and in result, betrayal by their loved once. For example, Gregor transforms into an insect and is unable to return to his normal life. In result, his family members are angry. They lock him up in his room and abandon him. Similarly, Emily is also rejected by a close person, specifically, her love interest. He doesn’t experience any feelings towards her. Therefore, he decides to leave her. Both characters experience transformation and betrayal. However, through the author’s use of language, symbolism, and plot, the reader can see that Gregor reacts calmly to betrayal and adapts to
…show more content…
The reader is able to feel sympathy towards Gregor because he is imprisoned in his room in a body of an insect. The passage says, “Often he would lie there all night long, not sleeping a wink, scratching at the leather couch for hours” (251). Only gazing out the window gave him “…The sense of freedom” (252). The author describes that Gregor is trapped in his room with no way out. Therefore, Kafka expresses Gregor as a victim, which creates a sympathetic tone in the readers. Emily on the other hand, creates pity and disgusting tone rather than sympathetic. After reading the story, the readers can agree with the towns folks that Emily is somehow “perverse” (p51). Only a person with mental disabilities would murder someone in order not to lose them. In conclusion, both characters experience transformation and deal with betrayal. However, Emily is described as a morbid figure, while Gregor is described as a victim. Emily creates an unflattering tone, while Gregor creates sympathetic
The reader is able to feel sympathy towards Gregor because he is imprisoned in his room in a body of an insect. The passage says, “Often he would lie there all night long, not sleeping a wink, scratching at the leather couch for hours” (251). Only gazing out the window gave him “…The sense of freedom” (252). The author describes that Gregor is trapped in his room with no way out. Therefore, Kafka expresses Gregor as a victim, which creates a sympathetic tone in the readers. Emily on the other hand, creates pity and disgusting tone rather than sympathetic. After reading the story, the readers can agree with the towns folks that Emily is somehow “perverse” (p51). Only a person with mental disabilities would murder someone in order not to lose them. In conclusion, both characters experience transformation and deal with betrayal. However, Emily is described as a morbid figure, while Gregor is described as a victim. Emily creates an unflattering tone, while Gregor creates sympathetic