Preview

A Rhetorical Analysis Of Nancy Sommers Between The Drafts

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
936 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
A Rhetorical Analysis Of Nancy Sommers Between The Drafts
Kaci Gray
Whitaker
ENGL 1113-065
12 September 2011
Rhetorical Analysis of Nancy Sommers: Between the Drafts Harvard graduate Nancy Sommers wrote Between the Drafts in February 1992. In many papers, a person is able to tell the direction of the paper within the first paragraph. However in Sommers article, the thesis does not appear until the end. Sommer’s thesis is “It is the thrill of the pull between someone else’s authority and our own, between submission and independence that we must discover how to define ourselves” (31). She uses her own personal experience to demonstrate that when writing how easy it is to lose sight of one’s own voice while trying to follow formal procedure. Sommer presents a good argument because she uses her own experiences in the beginning which readers lose sight of what the papers truly about. Through the course of her argument Sommers uses her personal life, methods of teaching and college
…show more content…
She comes to understand that it is with our daily lives that we begin to find ourselves and realize that our words not only the text matter. One has to give their own authority and their own standpoint to make their point argumentative. Through personal life, methods of teaching and college experience does Sommers truly notice the change between her own authority and textual information. It is within us that truly makes a paper what it is. Our own authority should be our judgment. Between the drafts makes one comprehend what really happens between 2 papers. Drafts not only have to be papers but they can pertain to our own lives as well. Arguments begin with our own voices. Either the risk one takes or the risk they do not. It is with much evidence and disdain that Sommers truly presents her argument. One is lost between the words of the paper to make it seem less effective. Sommers uses effective writing techniques’ and much revision to make her thesis

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    1) After scanned through the article, I think it is about a new kind of teaching method. It is quite short for a research paper, only have an introduction paragraph and two other paragraphs, “Argument as Persuasion Dialogue” and “Point of view and the commitment store”. Basically, the article suggest that when a student writing a essay, considering the arguments of the essay as a persuasion dialogue is a good concept for students to a good essay and makes students become a critical thinker. For me, writing a good essay with essay with a good argument are always hard, because I always give the most common arguments, which makes the essay board and tedious. It is actually make sense though, through the argument with teachers or peers, usually students could gain more information and build a wholesome thinking pattern. Hence, the will be able to write better essay. But students nowadays, or teenagers in general, is not that easy to be convinced. Even sometimes, as long as teachers tell them what is right, they will go to the exactly opposite direction on purpose. So, for a teacher, finding the balance point in the…

    • 831 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The ideas in the passage flowed well and all the ideas seemed connected. I applaud Stuart Green for paragraphing the ideas in a sense for the reader to know what he is saying and what to expect in the next paragraph. I thought it was interesting when he described an argument as a conversation. Before I read the passage, I did perceive an argument to be a heated conversation between two or more people and with harsh words, but the author made an argument seem to have a neutral tone. I now apprehend that a conversation can be an argument without the harsh tone. It can simply have more than one viewpoint without the harsh tone which is an argument. Also, I learned something new: the concept of framing. I didn’t know there was an exact word for the concept of framing. I thought it was always one word that just described the topic of the writing or reading piece. But, it is more than just one word or phrase that describes the topic. It can be a word that came from a passage you read that describes your own experience. I see it as an “inside joke” that is elaborated and explained throughout your writing piece. I think the idea of framing is a brilliant way to furbish your writing whether it’s an essay or even a paragraph. After learning this new concept, I will be sure to use it in my own writing. Moving on to Stuart Green’s conclusion, it was wonderfully written. I couldn’t agree more with him on the two different views of research. I believe people see research as plainly as gathering information. But, they don’t really apprehend the research they gather and use it for a purpose or they don’t see it as discovering a new possibility or even a…

    • 492 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    omg the foc

    • 1177 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Conflicting perspectives is the inevitable outcome of every individual’s attempt to discern what is right or wrong according to their own subjectivity and intuition. That is precisely why no single perspective is ever entirely righteous or incontrovertibly true. Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar, Scott Derrickson’s Exorcism of Emily Rose and David Kelley’s Boston Legal are prime examples of how conflicting perspectives not only occur between individuals but within the psyche of the self. It is in essence a battle of rhetoric and the art of language that dictates which perspective will ultimately triumph over another. Whether it is an endeavour to arrive at the truth or an attempt to settle a dispute, one’s perspective is always the product of theatrics and persuasive delivery.…

    • 1177 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    This week in class we looked at some of the logical mistakes that writers frequently make when constructing their arguments. Although it may not be immediately obvious why this topic should be covered in a writing course, my hope is that most of you can see how this section of the class relates to the composition of position papers. When we're writing an argumentative paper its critical that our arguments are logically sound; otherwise, we cant reasonably expect our readers to take our opinions seriously. Furthermore, learning to identity logical fallacies makes us all more criticle readers. Many excellent writers are soeloquant that they can compel! their audience to agree with them simply by writing an emotionally persuasive paper (the same, I should add, holds true for lawyers and politicians). While its fine to appreciate a well-crafted essay, we should all remain highly skeptical of any claim made by a writer who's logic appears suspect.…

    • 221 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    During class reviewing the three argumentative strategies, Classical, Toulmin, and Rogerian, each of them differed from one another. For this research project an article that seemed like a Classical argumentative style paper. Though it being Classical was fairly successful then again it could also pass for Toulmin’s argumentative style because of how the conclusion was thought out and written.…

    • 1080 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In doing so, Sommers supports her argument that the current revision process taught in schools, as part of a general, linear writing process, is failing to prepare students to be critical thinkers and to use their critical thinking skills to identify bigger issues in their writing and become good writers (Sommers 327). She argues that the reason for this failure is the perpetual view of writing as a comparison to oratory (Sommers 323). Hence, students focus too much on the actual words and not enough on what they want to do with the words; they worry about following the rules rather than getting their ideas across on paper (Sommers 326-327). Similarly, she argues that students believe the purpose of revision is to identify the technical mistakes within their papers; this perspective is distinct from experienced writers who view revision as a time to rethink their missions and the best ways to execute them in writing (Sommers 328). Sommers’ use of students’ perspectives on revision as compared to experienced writers’ perspectives is a clear example of how students are learning a fallacy in the classroom regarding their writing. They are learning that writing is founded on rules and teachers’ expectations rather than on their own opinions and…

    • 669 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    English Paper

    • 1028 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Cited: Ramage, John D., Bean, John C., and Johnson, June. (2007). Writing Arguments: A Rhetoric…

    • 1028 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Lastly, he talks about how writers need to listen to their voices. I agree that a writer's voice is what makes the authority of their writings and papers. Without the voice of the writer, then a paper wouldn’t have much to talk about. Voice is…

    • 448 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The reading for this week, “Elements of Academic Argument”, I thought that it was very helpful. I thought that it was very helpful because it gave very good tips on writing an academic argument. I have written an academic argument paper before. But, after reading this article I learned better ways of writing an academic argument paper. This article has taught me to keep a good stance in my paper and to use a certain choice of words to give the paper style so it isn’t flat.…

    • 87 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Your basic goal in this paper should be – at least in part – to persuade readers through narrative about a debatable issue. To achieve this goal, consider all aspects of the "rhetorical triangle" described in chapter 5 of The Everyday Writer and Chapter 11 of Good Reasons. What is your purpose in sharing this experience? What questions will you be answering for your audience? How might your audience be sympathetic and/or resistant to your story’s argument? What is the social context that your story occurs within?…

    • 723 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Wood, Nancy V. Perspectives on Argument. 6th ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson/Prentice Hall, 2009. Print.(601-613).…

    • 1630 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Serving in Florida

    • 980 Words
    • 4 Pages

    When thinking of the United States one would[may?] conjure up imagines of happy people, greener grass, freedom, and of course, opportunity. However an uncommon thing that one would think of America is a land of dumb people.[little confusing word choice] Yes, that’s right, Americans having less than average intelligence. In “Idiot Nation,” Michael Moore offers a convincing argument on America’s stupidity and inadequacy by employing logical as well as emotional appeals and harsh diction to drive his point home. [ your thesis statement should probably be more specific regarding the individual components.]…

    • 980 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Ever since I studied abroad in the U.S., improvement in argumentative writing was the most difficult part as an international student. While I naturally acquired listening and speaking skills as time passed, writing required me to practice it for betterment. In high school, I had trouble in English literature class because it was difficult to fully express my thoughts through in writing in English. Calculus was a clear cut for me with concrete answer while author’s theme in novel was ambiguous to define. After 10 weeks of Eng111 class with you, my ability to analyze complex text has been improved, and I write papers that have clearer claims with supportive stakes. All my papers deal with genre/audience awareness and creating strong arguments to get my point across. Through writing essays on developing complex claims that matter, being able to argue them, and revise them so that they are…

    • 1788 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The essay has a clear student voice, starting with an engaging introduction which understands—but is not prepared to countenance—total skepticism; despite the clumsy formulation (lines 4–5) one senses an awareness of alternative perspectives and a personal stand.…

    • 498 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Rhinoceros Comparison

    • 2222 Words
    • 9 Pages

    As professor Keawe guided us through the process of writing the paper we found the process to be much more in depth and in analysis then most professors. The world is more interested in instant gratification rather than reading a book and processing each detail in full, most people would rather go to the movie theater and pay their 10 dollars and enjoy a 2-hour movie. Many scholarly people enjoy the more depth and thought process needed while reading a book because it keeps the reader’s enjoyment at a pleasurable level. Since my professor is an English professor means that she analyzes all type of literature and print that it comes natural to her now. Since professor Keawe is pursuing her Ph. D.…

    • 2222 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays

Related Topics