Nora tells her friend Kristine, “…with all his masculine pride—how painfully humiliating for him if he ever found out he was in debt to me. That would just ruin our relationship. Our beautiful, happy home would never be the same” (Ibsen 794). A woman financially helping her husband us unacceptable, which restricts what women can and cannot do. Further into the conversation, Torvald proceeds to question Nora about whether or not she has had any macaroons today—she has had some even though he has asked her not to eat them because they are bad for her health—she replies, “You know I could never think of going against you” (Ibsen 788). It becomes clear early in the play that Nora is beneath Torvald in their relationship. Additionally, according to Toril Moi—a award winning literary critic— Torvald's control and Nora's thoughtlessness work together to theatricalize both themselves and each other in various idealist scenarios of female sacrifice and male rescue (Moi 257), which is a prime example of feminism and unjust gender roles. Moving forward to Act II, Nora is begging her husband to rehire Krogstad—an old friend of her husband that committed a forgery crime and is also the man Nora secretly took out her loan from—so he doesn’t tell her husband about the loan and her forgery. Torvald quickly becomes
Nora tells her friend Kristine, “…with all his masculine pride—how painfully humiliating for him if he ever found out he was in debt to me. That would just ruin our relationship. Our beautiful, happy home would never be the same” (Ibsen 794). A woman financially helping her husband us unacceptable, which restricts what women can and cannot do. Further into the conversation, Torvald proceeds to question Nora about whether or not she has had any macaroons today—she has had some even though he has asked her not to eat them because they are bad for her health—she replies, “You know I could never think of going against you” (Ibsen 788). It becomes clear early in the play that Nora is beneath Torvald in their relationship. Additionally, according to Toril Moi—a award winning literary critic— Torvald's control and Nora's thoughtlessness work together to theatricalize both themselves and each other in various idealist scenarios of female sacrifice and male rescue (Moi 257), which is a prime example of feminism and unjust gender roles. Moving forward to Act II, Nora is begging her husband to rehire Krogstad—an old friend of her husband that committed a forgery crime and is also the man Nora secretly took out her loan from—so he doesn’t tell her husband about the loan and her forgery. Torvald quickly becomes