3d Printing Research Paper
Despite the obvious benefits of 3D printing in the medical field, many people are opposed to the use of 3D printing for manufacturing implants. Opposing arguments claim that 3D printing creates unhealthy air emissions and that 3D printing materials are not safe. The form additive manufacturing called fused filament fabrication heats plastic and layers it to create 3D objects. When the plastic is heated it can release chemicals into the air that have been known to cause cancer. Some people argue that releasing carcinogens in a hospital environment is extremely dangerous and that 3D printing should not be used in hospitals for this reason. Also, some worry that the materials used to create implants will have negative effects when implanted into
…show more content…
Many arguments are made that bioprinting is not feasible or ethical. In the past, organ printing experiments have proven the difficulty of creating simple cell structures. With large amounts of money used for these projects and a high failure rate, it is easy to see this research as a waste and infeasible. Even more argued is the ethics of stem cell research pertaining to property rights and religious beliefs. The cells used for 3D printing organs come from donors that have healthy cells. Intellectual property laws do not consider living things and nature to be person or property, therefore making a persons cells not their own after they are no longer a pert of that person. Some consider the unrestricted use of a persons cells to be unjust. Also, many people feel that it is not ethical to create living organs and organisms because it goes against their religious beliefs. The creation of life is respected as sacred and should not be done synthetically. Aside from all of the arguments pertaining to bioprinting, it is possible to conduct 3D printing of organs in a feasible manner while maintaining ethical values. Research has proven the feasibility of printing organs by layering cells to create tissues. For the issue of intellectual property laws, the use of cells is restricted depending on the case. There are many
Many arguments are made that bioprinting is not feasible or ethical. In the past, organ printing experiments have proven the difficulty of creating simple cell structures. With large amounts of money used for these projects and a high failure rate, it is easy to see this research as a waste and infeasible. Even more argued is the ethics of stem cell research pertaining to property rights and religious beliefs. The cells used for 3D printing organs come from donors that have healthy cells. Intellectual property laws do not consider living things and nature to be person or property, therefore making a persons cells not their own after they are no longer a pert of that person. Some consider the unrestricted use of a persons cells to be unjust. Also, many people feel that it is not ethical to create living organs and organisms because it goes against their religious beliefs. The creation of life is respected as sacred and should not be done synthetically. Aside from all of the arguments pertaining to bioprinting, it is possible to conduct 3D printing of organs in a feasible manner while maintaining ethical values. Research has proven the feasibility of printing organs by layering cells to create tissues. For the issue of intellectual property laws, the use of cells is restricted depending on the case. There are many