Preview

2003 Audit Partner Rotation

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
856 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
2003 Audit Partner Rotation
The 2003 rules on the topic of audit partner rotation states that an audit partner must be rotated off the audit engagement if he/she has worked (been responsible for the issuance of the audit report reflecting the reporting of the financial statements and the dealings with the audit committee and management) on the engagement for the prior five consecutive years and be subject to a five year “time-out period” from the registrant. Previously, this rule was that the lead audit partner was to be rotated after seven years with a two year “time-out” period. Clearly, changes have been made and exceptions have been created as many concerns were brought up regarding this matter.
When evaluating the 2003 rules regarding audit partner rotation, the
…show more content…
Secondly, the rule is excluded for partners who function as a technical resource for the audit. These partners are used when the audit contains complex business transactions and the partner is responsible for dealing with the national office. Since this partner does not primarily deal with the auditing of the financial statements they are not subject to the rotation requirements. Lastly, smaller accounting firms are at a disadvantage for this requirement because there are not enough partners to rotate. Therefore, the SEC made an exception for accounting firms that have less than five audit clients and less than ten partners. Because these firms are excluded from the five-year audit partner rotation requirement, the SEC implemented a special rule requiring the PCAOB review the audit engagements of these firms at least once during a three year time period. This will ensure that the quality of their reports and competence of the partners are equivalent to that of the firms who are required to follow the five-year rotation

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Sec's Rule 78j-1

    • 1369 Words
    • 6 Pages

    For U.S. publicly-held companies, audit committee responsibilities are mandated or guided by the board, the committee’s charter, applicable listing requirements of the NYSE or NASDAQ; Securities and Exchange Commission rules; applicable federal and state laws; and common practices. While a complete delineation of these requirements is beyond the scope of this article, this series will focus on SEC’s Rule 10A-3 which implements the requirements of Section 10A(m) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 [15 U.S.C. 78j-1(m)] as mandated by Section 3 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 [15 U.S.C. 7202] relating to audit committee standards. The series will further highlight some of the additional…

    • 1369 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    A quasi- governmental agency called the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB) was created and charged with direct oversight and regulation of the accounting industry (Jahmani et al., 2008). PCAOB works in conjunction with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) to provide oversight of all public accounting firms and publically traded companies with the expressed purpose of protecting “ the interests of investors and further the public interest in the preparation of informative, fair and independent audit report” (PCAOB 2002)…

    • 1488 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Isqc 36 Study Guide

    • 4177 Words
    • 17 Pages

    (m) Partner – Any individual with authority to bind the firm with respect to the performance of a professional services engagement. (n) Personnel – Partners and staff. (o) Professional standards – IAASB Engagement Standards, as defined in the IAASB’s Preface to the International Standards on Quality Control, Auditing, Review, Other Assurance and Related Services, and relevant ethical requirements. (p) Reasonable assurance – In the context of this ISQC, a high, but not absolute, level of assurance. (q) Relevant ethical requirements – Ethical requirements to which the engagement team and engagement quality control reviewer are subject, which ordinarily comprise Parts A and B of the International Ethics Standards Board for Accountants’ Code of Ethics for Professional…

    • 4177 Words
    • 17 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Smackey Dog Food

    • 2442 Words
    • 10 Pages

    When auditing a publicly held company, auditors need to observe principles. The ethical principles of the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA) Code of Professional Conduct are independence, responsibilities, the public interest, integrity, objectivity and independence, due care, and scope and nature of services. More specifically, audit team members are required to be objective and independent with regard to the audit by maintaining objectivity and being free of conflicts of interest in discharging professional responsibilities and by being independent in fact and appearance when providing auditing and other attestation services. Through this one can see how influential the SEC is. Under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, auditors have to be objective and independent otherwise legal sanctions can be incurred.…

    • 2442 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Audit Case Study Walgreens

    • 4465 Words
    • 18 Pages

    The audit function creates several important relationships among the various parties. One of the most significant and potentially problematic relationships is between the audit firm and the audit client. The decision by the audit firm to accept or retain a client is crucial because of the potential risk of being associated with certain clients. Engagement risk is considered to be composed of three components: client's business risk, audit risk, and auditor's business risk.…

    • 4465 Words
    • 18 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The SOX Act put clear limits and boundaries on the amount of non-audit fees that an accounting firm can earn from the same firm that it audits and it also required that audit partners rotate every 5 years to limit. These changes make it so one auditing firm does not grow too comfortable with one company, eliminating some potential for collusion. SOX called on the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) to force companies to have audit committees that are…

    • 458 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Week 1 Homework Solutions

    • 654 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Rossi and Montgomery's primary ethical consideration is their professional competence to perform all of the audit work for filing with the SEC. In addition, if Rossi and Montgomery have performed bookkeeping services or certain consulting services for Mobile Home, they will not be independent under PCAOB and SEC independence requirements. The firm must also be a registered firm with the PCAOB.…

    • 654 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Sarbanes-Oxley Act created the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB) to assume the responsibility of overseeing the auditors of public companies. The PCAOB is a private-sector, non-profit corporation. It was established to "protect the interests of investors and further the public interests in the preparation of informative, fair, and independent audit reports". (The PCAOB) Although the PCAOB is a private sector organization, it has many government-like regulatory functions. The PCAOB was created in response to an increasing number of accounting restatements by public companies during the 1990s and a series of recent high-profile scandals like Enron and WorldCom. Prior to the PCAOB, the audit industry was self-regulated through the Public Oversight Board of the AICPA, but with the recent scandals and restatements something had to be changed.…

    • 1182 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    It also addresses new auditor approval requirements, audit partner rotation, and auditor reporting requirements. It restricts auditing companies from providing non-audit services (e.g., consulting) for the same clients.…

    • 2229 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    The proposal fashioned a novel, semi-public organization, the “Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, or PCAOB,” assigned with administrating, controlling, examining, and penalizing economic companies in their parts as examiners of community businesses. The plan also comprises matters such as “auditor independence, corporate governance, internal control assessment, and enhanced financial disclosure. The nonprofit arm of Financial Executives International (FEI), Financial Executives Research Foundation (FERF), completed extensive research studies to help support the foundations of the act” ("Spotlight On Sarbanes-Oxley Rulemaking And Reports",…

    • 1283 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Sarbanes-Oxley Act

    • 1677 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The 1980s was a time where many corporate misbehaviors and takeovers cost many people their jobs. The Treadway Commission, named after the organizer James C. Treadway, Jr., took the lead in examining the factors why companies misbehave and made recommendations to reduce fraudulent financial reporting. A group of private sectors in the accounting profession volunteered to carry out the goals of the Treadway Commission. This led to the formation of the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission, also known as COSO (Arens, Elders, & Beasley, 2010). COSO was the venue in driving the swift passage of SOX. SOX established the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB) under the oversight of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). The board is charged with the responsibility of overseeing and disciplining independent accounting firms in their role as auditors for public companies. The board has oversight on the implementation of stricter corporate governance, more disciplined exercise of auditor’s independence, enhanced audit reporting, more frequent review of control risk assessments and more informative report disclosures. Under the Sox, the SEC required firms to register with PCAOB to monitor strict compliance of SOX standards in the manner by which public accounting…

    • 1677 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Prepare a 1,400- to 1,750-word memo to the Audit Partner, John Smith, summarizing your findings from the following case found in Ch. 13 of Modern Auditing: Comprehensive Question13-27 Key West Company’s —PPS Sampling Problem…

    • 1520 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Clarity Project Paper

    • 546 Words
    • 3 Pages

    While undertaking its role of overseeing the auditors of public companies, the PCAOB, considers IAASB standards in the development of its own audit standards proposals. PCAOB has adopted eight auditing standards that relate to the auditor’s assessment of and response to potential risks in the audit process. The eight risk assessments audit standards deal with audit procedures and outputs from the initial stages of planning to advanced stages of final evaluation of the audit process and outcome; these standards came into effective operation in the year 2010.…

    • 546 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    53211

    • 301 Words
    • 2 Pages

    I enjoyed reading this case study because it is always more interesting to hear first hand reasoning from actual interviews with audit partners, rather than hearing about someone else’s opinion about it. However, sometimes the auditors could be a little bit biased against any new legislation that changes the way they have to conduct an audit. Overall I agreed with their general consensus, that increased partner rotation means greater independence which would increase overall audit quality. However, forced rotation also means that once an audit partner gets to know a specific company very well and is able to perform the audit more efficiently, they are forced to leave which causes the new partner to come in and start from scratch. Another thing I had never really considered with regards to this rule was the fact that audit partners’ personal lives are affected by this new rule. If they are assigned to an engagement in a new city, which seems to be often from what I read in the article, their quality of life and family dynamics are negatively affected (which ultimately can come back and affect work performance, in any occupation.) The demographic data that was presented in this article really opened my eyes and was extremely interesting to see the actual effects of this new law. In the end, as tough as it is to have to relocate their families and their homes, there is no trade off for independence and quality audits. Even though it is sad that it has to affect the partners’ quality of life, it is a sacrifice that I feel they should have to make, as part of a professional work ethic and as part of their duty to the users of financial…

    • 301 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Pcaob

    • 418 Words
    • 2 Pages

    On May 24, 2007, the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board voted to approve Auditing Standard No. 5 (AS5), titled “An Audit of Internal Control Over Financial Reporting That Is Integrated with An Audit of Financial Statements.” The newly approved AS5, drafted in organization with the Securities and Exchange Commission, replaces the PCAOB’s previous internal control standard, Auditing Standard No. 2. The PCAOB has stated that AS5 has four main goals: (1) to focus the internal control audit on the most important matters; (2) to eliminate procedures that are unnecessary to achieve the intended benefits; (3) to make the audit scalable to fit the size and the complexity of any company, (4) and to simplify the text of the standard.…

    • 418 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics