Preview

19th Century Colonialism

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
469 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
19th Century Colonialism
4. In order to incorporate fractional-year time periods within the payback framework, an important assumption that was made is that the timing of cash flows is assumed to be evenly distributed within the year. For instance, a 3.25 payback period indicates that the initial investment would be recovered by the first quarter of year 4. This is assuming that the net cash flow in year 4 is not received by the third quarter of the year in lump-sum (in which case, the correct answer would be 3.75) or assuming that the timing of NCF is evenly distributed. In other words, the fractional-year corresponds to fractioning the NCF of a year and assuming the timing of cash flows to be consistent with the year.
7. Given the shortcomings of the IRR methodology, it still proves to be an accurate method to use in evaluating the project alternatives facing IEI. It measures the benefits or returns relative to the amount invested and does not give a fixed dollar amount of return, unlike NPV which is prone to error. IRR also discounts the cash flows unlike the undiscounted payback period.
IRR also proves to be accurate because accdg. To this method, among the investment alternatives of IEI, only (c) or the combined project is acceptable because IRR>cc. This is consistent with the payback and NPV method where only c is acceptable as well.
8.
(a)The undiscounted payback method ranks the alternatives according to which recovers the initial investment fastest (lowest payback period). The alternatives of IEI has payback periods that exceed n. In this case, the project with the smallest remaining unrecovered initial investment is ranked highest.
(b)Using the NPV method, projects with the highest NPV is ranked highest.
(c)Using the IRR method, the investment with the highest IRR is ranked highest.
A particular method would seem superior to the other two depending on the terms. For instance, in terms of time-consumed for computation, the payback method is superior to the other two. On

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    BGA1 Task 4

    • 343 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The internal rate of return (IRR) is defined as the discount rate that results in a net present value of zero. IRR uses the time value of money method to calculate the present value of the projects cash inflows and outflows. Cost of capital, or minimum required rate of return, is compared to the IRR to evaluate a project. The IRR needs to be equal to or greater than cost of capital for the project to be acceptable. If the IRR is less than the cost of capital, the project should be rejected. When using IRR the cost of capital is referred to as the “hurdle rate”.…

    • 343 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Fi515

    • 967 Words
    • 4 Pages

    If two projects have the same cost, and if their NPV profiles cross in the upper right quadrant, then the project with the higher IRR probably has more of its cash flows coming in the later years.…

    • 967 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Keywords: NPV, NPV Profile, NPV, IRR, multiple IRRs, ranking conflict of NPV vs. IRR, payback period, profitability index, discount rate, cost of capital concept, cash flow analysis, cash flow timeline, conventional cash flow stream, non-conventional cash flow stream, sunk cost, opportunity cost, independent projects, mutually exclusive projects…

    • 1640 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Clark Paints

    • 275 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Payback is calculated by dividing the initial investment by the annual cash inflow. The payback period is when the cumulative net cash inflows begin to exceed the cumulative net cash outflows. If an investment involves uneven cash flows, the computation requires scheduling cash inflows and outflows. Hence payback period is the duration in which initial investments are recovered. Here the payback period is very low and its 3.7 years which is good for the project.…

    • 275 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    the regular payback method is deficient in that it does not take account of cash flows beyond the payback period. The discounted payback method corrects this fault. FALSE…

    • 393 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The internal rate of return (IRR) is the rate that the present value of cash inflows equal cash outflows. IRR is an estimation of the total return of the project over the life of the project assuming all cash flows are reinvested at the projects return rate. This method will provide Guillermo with an idea of what the project might earn over the life of the project. Once the IRR is determined it can be compared to the desired rate of return Guillermo wishes to receive to determine…

    • 614 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Finance Work

    • 424 Words
    • 2 Pages

    For the following projects, compute NPV, IRR, MIRR, profitability index, and payback. If these projects are mutually exclusive, which one(s) should be done? If they are independent, which one(s) should be undertaken?…

    • 424 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    case study

    • 1940 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Due to decreasing margins on their recent construction projects RBH needs a project to bring their revenues and profits up for the upcoming years. RBH’s Southern California division (one of 15) and its VP Michael Borland have come up with a prospective project “The Platinum Pointe Land Deal” which has potentials to increase profits and revenues. The issue with it remains is that the project has a IRR of 21 and for a project like this Michael Borland and his division has calculated a required IRR of 24.5.…

    • 1940 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    bus224 tut 3

    • 1650 Words
    • 7 Pages

    When cash flows are conventional, if projects are independent, the decision involves either accepting or rejecting them. In this case, and assuming that there is only one internal rate of return, the two methods lead to the same accept/reject decisions. If the projects are mutually exclusive, it is possible that the two methods will rank projects in a different order. IRR can be less reliable and harder to…

    • 1650 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Investment Detective

    • 439 Words
    • 2 Pages

    3. What rank should we assign to each project? Why do payback and NPV not agree completely? Which criterion is best?…

    • 439 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Energy Gel Case Study

    • 455 Words
    • 2 Pages

    We also see here that they chose to use the payback period and ROIC in order to evaluate the project. A more accurate tool to use for this evaluation would have been either NPV or IRR.…

    • 455 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Harding Plastic Company

    • 558 Words
    • 3 Pages

    No. While, in general, it is true that when one discounted cash flow method (NPV, PI, or IRR) gives a project an acceptable rating, the other two methods also give this project an acceptable rating; it is not necessarily true that these discounted cash flow methods will rank these acceptable projects in the same order. Ranking differences may occur as a result of (a) the time disparity problem resulting from differences in the cash inflow patterns over time between two projects; (b) the size disparity problem, resulting from the comparison of projects requiring initial cash outflows of differing size; or (c) the life disparity problem, resulting from projects with differing lives. These problems are illustrated in the case with Projects A and B representing the time disparity problem, C and D, the size disparity problem, and with E, F, G, and H, the life disparity problem. The ranking problems incurred using the discounted cash flow methods are generally a function of the different assumptions made about the reinvestment opportunities for cash inflows over the life of the project.…

    • 558 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    I consider IRR as independent variable, NPV at minimum ROR and Equivalent Annuity as functions (just like Polynomials function in Math) for each 10 projects because project 6 (Effluent – water treatment at four plants) definitely should be done.…

    • 340 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    3. Compute the internal rate of return (IRR) and payback period for each project. How should these…

    • 787 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    CF 0708 Ex Resolution

    • 2206 Words
    • 30 Pages

    a. Suppose Fuji’s cutoff payback period is two years. Which of these two projects should be chosen?…

    • 2206 Words
    • 30 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays