Preview

1. Explain The Difference Between Original And Appellate Jurisdiction

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
557 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
1. Explain The Difference Between Original And Appellate Jurisdiction
1. Explain the difference between original and appellate jurisdiction.
The difference between the original jurisdiction and the appellate jurisdiction is original jurisdiction who is the lower court gets to hear the court case first meanwhile the appellate the high power court can review decision and change the outcome.
2. Describe the two ways a case might come to the Supreme Court. Explain fully.
For a case to get to the Supreme Court is by the case being appeal by the appellate jurisdiction. Another way is if you case it in trial court. From there if you decide to appeal you case then it will go to higher court meaning the Supreme Court.
3. What actions can the court take on the petitions it receives? How many justices must agree in just to “hear” a case?
The court can decide whether or not they want to see the
…show more content…
The lower courts tell the high court what they have and that helps the Supreme Court decision more easier. Also all justices have oral arguments to hear one another's saying to making the decision.
5. Briefly discuss the cases of Plessy V. Ferguson (1896) and Brown V. Board of Education (1954). Explain why each is an example of “activism” or “restraint”
On the case of Plessy V. Ferguson ruled that segregation was legal as long as white and blacks are equal. Meanwhile the Brown V. Board of Education was that the racial segregation in public schools were unconstitutional. In the case of Plessy V.Ferguson is an example restraint. They didn’t want to get rid of segregation just make everyone equal. While with the Brown V. Board of Education that is an example activism. Activism is changing a policy and making it right. In this case the sergreation school was unconstitutional and they got rid of them and that is an example of activism.
6. Describe in detail the appointment (nomination/confirmation) process for Supreme Court Justices and federal

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Hsc300 Unit 4

    • 588 Words
    • 3 Pages

    8. Venue and Jurisdiction: Disagreement about where and which courts will hear claims; resolves which courts such judicial action will take place…

    • 588 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Procedure: what occurred in the lower courts? Decisions made in the lower courts (before the Supreme Court).…

    • 4749 Words
    • 19 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Drawing Conclusions Supreme Court cases inevitably end with a decision from the Court. Describe the three types of opinions that can be written as part of that…

    • 597 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Marbury Vs. Madison Case

    • 629 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The case I briefed was the Marbury vs Madison case. The issue prosecuted was does Marbury have a right to the commission? Does the law grant Marbury a remedy? Does the Supreme Court have the authority to review acts of congress and determine whether they are unconstitutional and therefore void? Can congress expand the scope of the supreme courts original jurisdiction beyond what is specified in article III of the constitution, and lastly does the Supreme Court have original jurisdiction to issue units of mandamus. .…

    • 629 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Case Study Assignment

    • 395 Words
    • 2 Pages

    4. The case was heard by three lower courts before it reached the United States Supreme Court. List those three courts in order, beginning with the court that has the most authority and ending with the court that has the least amount of authority.…

    • 395 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    R Vs Robert

    • 577 Words
    • 3 Pages

    1. What is the proper citation for the case you have chosen? Who are the parties to the appeal and what is each of their role in the appeal? What category of law does the case fall into and how do you know that?…

    • 577 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Based specifically on the assigned readings on Mendez v. Westminster and Brown v. Board of Education, please respond to the following questions. Each of your answers should consist of one paragraph comprised of 5-7 sentences.…

    • 807 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The United States has two types of court structures which are called a dual court system. Each of the judicial systems has their separate systems one for each of the states and the other for the Federal system. The U.S. Supreme is the only place where the two judicial systems connect.…

    • 272 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Supreme Court's landmark decision in Brown v. Board of Education is an example of one Supreme Court case overruling a prior Supreme Court case to promote justice.…

    • 452 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    In this paper I’m going to detail the judicial process of a Supreme Court case, which was the first of its kind. The Supreme Court did not have original jurisdiction over this case. It traveled through each juridical system before reaching the Supreme Court. This case was of interest to them, not to question it the defendant was guilty, but were his constitutional rights violated in the process of prosecuting him. This case began with an anonymous tip that the defendant was growing illegal contraband at his home. The DEA assigned Detective Padraja and Detective Bartelt to sit on the home. After making the decision that no one was home the…

    • 1003 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Zero Tolerance Case Study

    • 1984 Words
    • 8 Pages

    1.In 1967 in In Re Gault the U.S. Supreme Court stated that “the condition of being boy does not justify a kangaroo court” thus ruling that the constitution applies to proceedings in the juvenile court. The term “kangaroo court” refers to judicial proceedings that have the appearance of fairness but are not because outcomes are predetermined in advance of the trial. Describe how Judge Civarelli denied juveniles their constitutional rights.…

    • 1984 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The modern civil rights movement has been affected by three very important Supreme Court cases. The first infamous case was the Dred Scott v. Sanford decision which dreadfully took away the rights of African Americans. Then the case of Plessy v. Ferguson was held in 1896 which had a major impact on the civil rights movement. This case decided that African Americans were “separate but equal”. Then finally the last infamous case was the Board v. the Board of Education which overruled the case of Plessy v. Ferguson. These cases made a huge dent on the civil rights movement and the equality laws we have instilled today.…

    • 1025 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The decision in Brown v. Board of Education is one that has been in the making for quite some time. The case itself consists of five smaller individual cases coming from five separate states. In each and every one of these cases it was decided that the equal protection clause of the fourteenth amendment was not upheld. Despite the conclusions drawn in each of these cases. The reach of these cases was minimal and confined to the states the cases originated in. The five existing cases were combined to form Brown v. Board of Education. When the cases were presented all together, the argument was strengthened and became a case of national importance.…

    • 472 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Criminal Justice 101

    • 2648 Words
    • 11 Pages

    The supreme court is often called the court of last resort, because this is the last place to go to try and appeal a conviction. Justices of the Supreme Court ordinarily do not conduct trials. They decide an appealed case by reading the record of the trial and briefs filed by the parties, and hearing…

    • 2648 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Wade is a key example of judicial activism and strict constructionism going up against one another. The court opinion ruled that abortion is a constitutional right for every woman, as the fourteenth amendment referencing individual liberty is broad enough to put it under constitutional protection. This is a clear example of judicial activism, as their is no place in the constitution that references abortion, yet it is covered under the constitution. The dissent had a more strict constructionist and originalist (what the founding fathers meant) way of thought, arguing that at the time of the Bill of Rights creation all states had laws against abortion, therefore meaning that the constitution does not protect it. This example truly demonstrates how a case can be made for many different laws to mean what a judge may deem it no matter…

    • 691 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays