Preview

Various Methods of Resolving Industrial Disputes

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1667 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Various Methods of Resolving Industrial Disputes
Dispute Resolution Methods
Alberta’s Labour Relations Code and Police Officers Collective Bargaining Act provide methods for resolving disputes including:

Mediation
Voluntary Arbitration Board
Compulsory Arbitration Board
Interest Arbitration Board
Disputes Inquiry Board
Public Emergency Tribunal
Construction Industry Disputes Resolution Tribunal
Introduction

Collective bargaining is the process through which employers and employees establish the terms and conditions of employment in unionized workplaces. The vast majority of collective agreements in Alberta are reached through negotiations without outside assistance (over 80 per cent) or through negotiations using a provincially-appointed mediator. Fewer than two per cent of collective bargaining negotiations result in a strike or lockout, a need for special action by the parties or special provincial intervention.

The Labour Relations Code automatically extends the terms and conditions of the existing contract that may otherwise expire while bargaining continues. This is called bridging and continues until a new collective agreement is achieved, a lawful strike or lockout takes place, or bargaining rights are terminated.

The Code requires the parties to meet with each other and bargain in good faith. Both sides must make every reasonable effort to enter into a collective agreement. If one party feels the other is failing to meet or to bargain in good faith, that party may file a complaint with the Alberta Labour Relations Board. If the complaint cannot be settled, the Board may hold a hearing, make a finding, and, if necessary, issue directives or impose conditions to ensure that good faith bargaining resumes.

Mediation

At any time during collective bargaining, either party may ask for the assistance of a mediator. The appointment of a mediator is considered a regular part of the collective bargaining process.

Normally, there are four possible outcomes of mediation:

The mediator

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Thesis: The Lakeside Packers case demonstrates that the province of Alberta requires the Labour Code to be amended to allow for First Contract Arbitration in the Collective Bargaining Process.…

    • 2158 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Wood Idrl320 Assignment2

    • 1041 Words
    • 3 Pages

    After reading the case of Mariposa Stores Limited, I have found a few similarities with the Wal-Mart case. Historically, we have found that employers have been opposed to unions from an economic standpoint. The actions of Mariposa towards their employees of Store 58, goes against the workers organizing efforts which i an example of defiance against the freedom to associate. In Alberta, there isn’t a no first collective agreement legislation. So in this case, Mariposa Stores Limited are determined not to be a unionized workforce. Therefore, if they can’t stop the certification drive, the next step would be for employers to prevent getting a first collective agreement.…

    • 1041 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The role of the Mediator will be that of a neutral third party, who will have no long-term interest in the consequences or outcome of the dispute. His or her role will be that of a facilitator and advisor in the settlement negotiations. The Mediator may comment on issues and express his or her opinion regarding the relative strength or weakness of the parties’ positions.…

    • 610 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Management claimed to have been generous in the last agreement offer, where they met 80% of the worker’s demand, but the agreement still got rejected. The union argued that the key issues were not kept in mind while constructing the agreement that was offered. The negotiations soon ended and the situation was then handed over to an arbitrator, who forced a settlement that was similar-to the last agreement offer that was rejected. Air Canada stated that they felt like the arbitrator favoured the union due to their preference of gradual change over radical change. However, the union felt that the government interference in the situation favoured Air Canada. The two parties clearly had different priorities for the collective agreement. The management claimed that the union was not clear and concise with what they wanted out of the negotiation. The language used by the management or the union in this case did not necessarily matter at the end because the decision was made by the arbitrator. However, during the initial negotiation I feel like both parties came off very strong. The union members were extremely frustrated with their circumstances, which resulted in the management to become…

    • 431 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    20s AND 30s HISTORY REVIEW 1

    • 3203 Words
    • 11 Pages

    When western Canadian trade unionists met in Calgary, gov’t made sure police agents were there to monitor events…

    • 3203 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    collective agreements are of fixed duration that embody a sharp distinction between negotiation of and interpretation of an agreement…

    • 401 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    1. What major events in Canada’s labour relations history got Phil to the point in which he could lawfully organize a union, have it certified, and negotiate a collective agreement with the company? (10 marks)…

    • 385 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    IDRL 305 Discussion 2

    • 697 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Collective bargaining decisions are made based on various factors. When making such decisions, each side will consider who has more to gain should collective bargaining take place. In the event collective bargaining does not take place, who will be in the better position should the status quo remain? The bottom line is that there needs to be a balance of power between the employer and the employees to ensure conflicts are solved.…

    • 697 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Mg420 Labor Relations Paper

    • 3266 Words
    • 14 Pages

    Collective bargaining is the process of negotiations involving the representatives of the employer and employee for terms and conditions of employment that will apply to the employee. In the United States the negotiations that happen between concerning parties are written into legally binding contracts and usually last from one to five years (Budd, 2013).…

    • 3266 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    References: Carrell, Michale R. (2013). Labor Relations and Collective Bargaining. New Jersey: Pearson Education, Inc.…

    • 1103 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Employment and Labor Regulations - Collective Bargaining, Mandatory Subjects of Bargaining, what are they? p.489 Pay rate, insurance plans, holidays, overtime pay, vacations, retirement plans, work hours, individual merit raises, breaks and lunch periods, safety practices, seniority rights, discipline procedures, termination procedures, recall rights, union dues collection, grievance procedures, arbitration procedures, no-strike clauses, and drug testing.…

    • 5283 Words
    • 22 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    It is the process of negotiating between the employers and employee to reach an agreement that regulates working conditions and it processes involves preparation, negotiation and implementation. The employees are represented by the Labor Union to ensure fair act treatment from the employer. We will talk about the history and important acts that took place in Collective Bargaining, the importance of Collective Bargaining from both the employee and employer, the bargaining tactics, the 5 Collective Bargaining Process, issues of Collective Bargaining, bargaining deadlocks, strikes and types of strikes.…

    • 2623 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    By repelling Bill 115, the Provincial Government is still imposing on Collective Bargaining. Bill 115 has granted the Minister of Education the power to take away many of the usual avenues in the bargaining process, such as the right to strike, seeking arbitration or appealing to the Labour Relations Board. It is an aggressive move that has not worked, but only inflamed relations with teachers in Ontario.…

    • 1059 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    WK 1 Quiz

    • 388 Words
    • 2 Pages

    A collective bargaining agreement negotiated between an employer and its workers is an informal agreement outlining the terms and conditions of employment.…

    • 388 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The aim of this policy is to resolve grievances promptly, through effective communication and discussion. Informal discussions between employees and their headteacher/line manager are key to this and the vast majority of employee grievances can and should be resolved in this way. This approach prevents undue delay, lessens distress to the parties involved and it encourages good working relationships. It provides informal and formal routes for resolving employee grievances quickly, fairly, efficiently and as close to the source of the issue as possible. Its specific aims are…

    • 458 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays