Preview

Unit 1 Sociology Revision Notes

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
11742 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Unit 1 Sociology Revision Notes
Unit 1 Sociology Revision Notes
KEY:
Sociologist
Terminology
Study

KEY:
Sociologist
Terminology
Study

TOPIC 1: COUPLES
The domestic division of labour
The domestic division of labour refers to the roles that men and women play in the relation to housework, childcare and paid work

Parsons: instrumental and expressive roles * in the traditional nuclear family the roles of husbands and wives are segregated
Parsons (1995) identified the clear division of labour between spouses: * Husbands played an instrumental role, being the breadwinner and achieving well in work in order to provide economical support for his family whereas the wife had an expressive role which was to be a housewife and provide primary socialisation for the children and meeting the emotional needs of the family * Parson argues that the division of labour happens due to biological differences that women are naturally suited for the nurturing role and men are normally suited to be a provider * Parson thinks that this division of labour is suited for both men and women, to their children and generally wider society. The New Right agree with this theory * Young and Willmott (1962) argue that husbands are becoming a new man and doing more domestic tasks plus more wives are becoming career women, earning a wage which helps to economically support the family * Feminists rejects Parsons’ view as they feel it only benefits men and the division of labour is not natural

Joint and segregated conjugal roles
Bott (1957) distinguishes between two types of conjugal roles within marriage: * Segregated conjugal roles are when the man is the breadwinner and the wife is the homemaker but their leisure activities also tend to be separate. Similar to Parson’s theory * Joint conjugal roles where the couples share tasks such as housework and childcare also spending their leisure time together
Young and Willmott identify a pattern of segregated families in a traditional

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    husband’s wages, women began to expect more from their husbands. When the idea of this…

    • 1020 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Soc 402 Week 4 Analysis

    • 449 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Second Shift . Respond to the following questions: Among twin- income and dual-career families, do you think there will ever be an equal sharing of household work? Why or why not? There has been some indication that women voluntarily assume a larger share of household responsibilities because they feel that their male partners do not perform these tasks satisfactorily. How do you think this observation fits in with the sharing of housework?…

    • 449 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Gender roles and marriage have been stereotyped for years. The husband earned a living while the woman stayed home did the cooking and laundry and raised the kids. Today, however, roles have reversed in many households. The husbands stay home and take care of the children, do the cooking, and run the errands while the wife earns the income. The biggest change over the years is that the husband and wife both work to make-ends meet. In comparing and contrasting James Thurber’s “The Secret Life of Walter Mitty” and Tristan Bernard’s, I’m going!…

    • 2069 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    According to Parsons, in the traditional nuclear family, the roles of husbands and wives are segregated. His functionalist model of the family shows a clear division of labour between spouses, with the husbands having instrumental roles, known as providing for the family, and wives having expressive roles to do with socialising the children and being a homemaker. This allows the husband, and the wife to have clear set out tasks but on the other hand, people could say the women have more to deal with and the men have less to do. Parsons also argues that the division of labour is natural because women are ‘naturally’ suited to the nurturing role and the men to that of a provider. Other sociologists have criticised Parsons, for example, Young and Willmott argue that men are now taking a greater share of domestic tasks and more wives are becoming wage earners. Furthermore, feminist sociologists reject Parsons’ view that the division of labour is natural, and that it only benefits men. From Parson’s idea of family roles, it could be argued that the family roles have not changed at all, yet the criticisms show that the family roles have changed a little.…

    • 779 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    For example, Willmott and Young, who take a march of progress view see family as becoming increasingly symmetrical. They argue that women who participate in paid employment are more likely to experience joint conjugal roles. This is because they are unable to do it all on their own. Criticise – Feminists such as Ann Oakely do not believe that women working is a key factor that brings equality to the division of labour….give some evidence…

    • 366 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Comparative Critique

    • 812 Words
    • 4 Pages

    According to examples seen in the idealized Nuclear Family of the 1950’s, wives handle domestic life whereas husbands retain financial support. Edelman shows how fixed gendered work is in our society. Even though many women feel liberated and inspired to be independent from their husbands, more often than not, these women still end up doing most of the domestic work and end up as stay at home moms (323). Edelman discusses the challenges that married couples face when trying to find a balance between responsibilities at work and at home. Edelman uses her own marriage as her example in her article, in which her husband works ninety-two hours a week and she is forced to put aside her dreams temporarily to support her children at home (321). Like Bartels, she feels neglected by her spouse.…

    • 812 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Hdfs 145 Syllabus

    • 4333 Words
    • 18 Pages

    Instructor: Mrs. Joy Jacobs, CFCS, MAEd (“Mrs. J.”) E-mail address: jacobsj@msu.edu Please always use “HDFS 145" on the subject line when you e-mail. Office hours: Mrs. J. will be in the classroom one half hour before and will stay after class until all students are gone, or you may make an appointment with her. Go to this website: https://ntweb11.ais.msu.edu/aas/ Because of advising responsibilities, she is not available for walk-in appointments and she cannot take phone calls from students. She HATES playing “phone tag”, so please do not try to leave phone messages in her office! Undergraduate Learning Assistants who will be helping with this class: Abbey Feldpausch feldpa62@msu.edu Keeps track of students whose last names begin with A through K Carly Lesoski lesoskic@msu.edu Keeps track of students whose last names begin with L through Z Office hours: Tuesdays from 4:30 to 6:30 PM in the Student Lounge, Room 4 Human Ecology Two Required Texts (bundled together if purchasing new): The Marriage and Family Experience (11th edition) by Bryan Strong, Christine DeVault, & Ted Cohen, Cengage Wadsworth/Thomson Learning, Publishers (Do NOT let a book store employee tell you that the 10th edition is OK. The reading assignments will not make sense if you have the 10th edition.) and FCE 145 Additional Readings supplemental text Custom Editor Steve Korb, Cengage Wadsworth/Thomson Learning, Publishers The study guide to the Strong & DeVault text is not recommended nor required, This class uses the ANGEL class management program. The syllabus, handouts, and some announcements will be posted on ANGEL, although some times you may will be contacted directly via e-mail. If you forward your MSU mail to another e-mail service, be certain that the transfer is working. You are responsible for knowing the content posted on ANGEL and e-mailed to your MSU e-mail address. Course Description: “The Individual,…

    • 4333 Words
    • 18 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Response Paper

    • 1213 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The article states that men and women have their differences in society and labor, and…

    • 1213 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Men are more comfortable with their wives going to work than they are willing to help out at home more. In the 1950s, women were expected to be good housewives. Women were not to go college and if they did it was only to meet their future husbands. Women were expected to stay home and do housework and take care of the children. Ferber says, “Housework and childcare continued to be viewed as the women’s responsibility whether or not she also had a paid job” (2). Mothers today are arguing back and forth over the “Mommy Wars”. The “Mommy Wars” is where working mothers are criticizing stay at home mothers for not working and in turn, non-working mothers criticize working mothers for not spending enough of family time together. Rather than debating the “Mommy Wars” some women are complaining of having to work “the second shift” once they get home from work. The second shift refers to when a mother has worked a full day and then goes home to do just about the same amount of work by cooking dinner, doing laundry, cleaning the house, and taking care of the kids. Ferber says, “Women do fifty-two hours a week in housework and child rearing while the men do eleven hours a week” (2). Men should be contributing to the housework more, regardless if the wife works or stays at home. The resource theory, proposed by Robert Blood and David Wolfe, “Focuses on the importance of accumulated resources of a spouse as the source of power within a marriage, which is likely to be used to make the other partner do more of the housework” (3, Ferber). The more control women have at work the more control they have at…

    • 1281 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    sociology

    • 753 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Domestic division of labour is referred to the roles that both men and women play in comparison to housework. There are 2 types of roles called conjugal roles and joint roles. Conjugal roles are where partners have different tasks within the family so there is a clear division of male and female roles. However joint roles is where partners share their roles so there is few divisions in the family making the household more symmetrical.…

    • 753 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The male is still the dominant in the household and provides for the family and the female makes sure to bring up the children, cook, clean and care for every family member with her love. When analyzing what is stated in the previous paragraph, women have actually been working sense the beginning but many have failed to realize it because the women were not being paid for what they did because it was seen as their duties. Now that both genders are treated equally many men are experiencing the role that many women have taken throughout history, which requires them to care for their children, cook, clean and go to work. Although they are able to balance all of those things, men are beginning to value all that women have contributed to having a comfortable lifestyle.…

    • 1437 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    As domestic people that all their could capable of is nursing children. Thankfully, due to economic necessity, women began to work, demonstrating that we are capable of so much more. In terms how men,.the went from being simple hunting creatures, to disciplinarian being to a loving and proud father. All these occurrences and gender roles have lead us to the family systems we have today. The family systems today are quite variant, but for the most part the work that comes with being part of a family is shared equally in two partner relationships and women and men are perceived to be equally…

    • 307 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    For the northern industrial regions, the growing urban regions caused the family dynamic to change. Land was no longer a primary concern but instead jobs themselves. Offspring were much more likely to leave the family in search of employment. A divide also emerged between the workplace and the home. Income earners traveled to work which left domestic duties in the home environment. This led to a sharp distinction between male and female roles. Unlike the rural households where all family members produced, women became responsible for certain “domestic virtues”. Their roles as mothers, wives, and consumers were all enhanced. (American History,…

    • 992 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Approaches in Sociology

    • 623 Words
    • 3 Pages

    * 9. Real World Application: Functionalist Perspective and MarriageThe traditional family structure inwhich the husband was abreadwinner and the wifetended children and…

    • 623 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    It must be noted how today, in our progressive society, we rarely follow the traditional roles that were once followed. At one time, men were the bread-winners and women stayed at home with their children, where in the post modern society we live in, those roles are deemed conservative and are unfilled and often…

    • 282 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays