Preview

Social Insects

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
848 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Social Insects
Social Insects

“The little things that run the world”- E.O. Wilson

Social Insects
I. Levels of sociality II. Castes and Polyethism III. Social insect examples IV. Ecological success

Society
• A group of individuals that belong to the same species and are organized in a cooperative manner.

Aggregations

• Non-social grouping of individuals

Monarch butterflies aggregating

Levels of Sociality
• • • • • Solitary Subsocial Parasocial Eusocial Presocial

Classification system for presocial and eusocial insects
Common nest Cooperative site brood care Reproductive castes Generational gap Solitary Subsocial or communal No Yes No No No No No No

Quasisocial Semisocial Eusocial

Yes Yes Yes

Yes Yes Yes

No Yes Yes

No No Yes

Solitary
• Interactions among individuals limited to sexual behavior and competiton • Adult-to-offspring relationship limited to oviposition • EXAMPLES: phasmids, solitary bees

Subsocial
• Adults protect/and or feed the young after hatching, but parents take off or die prior to maturity of offspring (limited parental care) • Some provide food (progressive provisioning)
Female shield bug protects her brood from a predatory spider

Parasocial
• Interactions among adults of the same generation • Includes communal, quasi-social, and semisocial behavior
– Communal (aggregate to build nests together, but construction & provisions is done individually) – Quasi-social (while making provisions for own eggs, individuals share their provisions) – Semisocial (females are mated and lay eggs as queens)

Semi-social: Polistes (paper) wasps

“Presocial”
• Any social behavior beyond sexual behavior, yet short of eusocial behavior

Myschocyattarus spp. Vespidae Paper wasps from Indonesia

Eusocial
“true sociality” requires: 1) Cooperative brood care 2) Reproductive division of labor 3) At least 2 generations overlap (kids aid parents in colony work)

Honey bees on brood comb

Eusocial Insect Groups

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Ms105

    • 297 Words
    • 2 Pages

    It should also be noted that the condition of the nests on the human access side were much less suitable for successful offspring than the nests of the non-human access side.…

    • 297 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    2. Fox, Robin. 1979. Kinship Categories. Evolutionary Biology and Social Behavior: Anthropological Perspective. William Irons, Pp. 132-144. North Scituate, MA: Duxbury Press.…

    • 920 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Chapter 4.2 Outline

    • 492 Words
    • 2 Pages

    (i) When and how it reproduces, the food it eats, and the way in which it obtains that food…

    • 492 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In the essay “Actually, It Doesn’t Take a Village”, the author Diane Swanbrow argues about that it is not helpful to raise children in a big family because they may face stress competitions of scared resources. At the beginning of the essay, the author uses an example of an African family to show that the human society is not fit for the cooperative breeding theory. Since, children’ survival depends on the survival of their parents. When some resources are scarce, everyone will fight for those limited resources, even someone has close relationship. According to Swanbrow’s observation, grandparents will compete with their grandchild in Africa. In conclude, grandparents will not benefit children’ life quality,…

    • 548 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    SOCI 1301 Paper 5

    • 649 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Group: Any number of people with similar norms, values, and expectations who interact with one another on a regular basis.…

    • 649 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    personal log

    • 510 Words
    • 3 Pages

    1. What are the five main types of interspecific interactions discussed in the chapter? Describe each.…

    • 510 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ant 101

    • 529 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Kinship systems in Foraging and Horticultural based societies provide support for people in all stages of their life. Address the following in a two- to three-page paper:…

    • 529 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Rothstein SI. 1990. A model system for coevolution: avian brood parasitism. Annu Rev Ecol Syst. 21:481-508.…

    • 1178 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    To observe and test by product mutualism, likeliness of flycatchers to mob a predator in neighboring territories was determined. A stuffed…

    • 315 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Professor Kobari's discussion mentioned that access to mates, access to food, and avoiding predators as key reasons as to why primates live in social groups. Specific types of social groups are as follows... 1) Solitary: fend for themselves and interact only for reproduction purposes, 2) monogamy: male & female pair, 3) polygyny (one/multi male), and 4) polyandry: women reproduces with multiple male primates…

    • 198 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    References: 1. Allen, J. C., Schaffler, W. M. & Rosko, D. 1993. Sexual conflict in the house sparrow: interference between polygynously mated females versus asymmetric male investment. Behavioral Ecol. Sociobiol. Cambridge University Press.…

    • 1508 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The existing social groups of primates encompass, one-male, milti-female; one-female, multimale; multimale, multifemale; all male; one male, one female; and solitary. Usually the greater number of organisms in a group the greater increase of fitness since it provides easy access to food, alongside with protection therefore polygynous, and polyandrous groups have a greater chance of surviving and reproducing thus a greater fitness. On the other hand, solitary and monogamous groups have the unfortunate advantage of low numbers and therefore lack the protection and food advantages a group gives.…

    • 415 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    2. Nowak, B., & Laird, P. (2010). Cultural anthropology. San Diego, Bridgepoint Education, Inc. https://content.ashford.edu…

    • 1013 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Aboriginal Kinship

    • 641 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Kinship is one of the main principles of a foraging culture’s social organization. The way they interact with each other relies on the relationship they have together. If one member wanted to marry another member of the society, they would not behave in the same manner as they would with a blood relative such as a mother or father. In foraging societies the nuclear family is the most important because it is very adaptable to changing situations (Nowak & Laird, 2010).…

    • 641 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The social dynamics of the group were generally favorable. One couple (couple S) took the initiative and encouraged other parents to share their circumstances and how they handled certain situations. This couple were the youngest parents there and always sort the advice of the other parents.…

    • 1073 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics