Preview

: Reflect upon the validity of Machiavelli’s statement that most people are selfish, fickle, and corrupt.

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
306 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
: Reflect upon the validity of Machiavelli’s statement that most people are selfish, fickle, and corrupt.
Joezer Lominy Written Reflection
Direction: Reflect upon the validity of Machiavelli’s statement that most people are selfish, fickle, and corrupt.
I’m totally in accord with Mechiavelli’statement that most people are selfish, fickle, and corrupt. Because if we use the United States of America as an example we will find out that most people are selfish and corrupt. But it’s not our fault for being selfish because the society that we are living in America today require our self to be selfish not selfish in a wrong way but in a good way. What I meant by it is that; someone is selfish when he/her concerned chiefly with one's own personal profit pleasure. In America some people use the kindness of others to make profit or money by suing him/her. To succeed in such a thing you must be a lion and a fox at the same time. Machiavelli has completely reason but sometimes it’s not our fault if we are selfish and corrupt even we know that corruption is not something good. But we can interpret it in so many ways. Corruption may include many activities including bribery and embezzlement. Bribery is the improper use of gifts and favors in exchange for personal gain. This is also known as kickbacks or, in the Middle East, baksheesh it is most common form of corruption. Embezzlement involves someone with access to funds or assets illegally taking control of them. I think it’s not a bad thing being fickle because sometimes it is good to be fickle that might private you from a death or something even worst, the spy people or the government use the fickleness a lot. In conclusion it is a fact that most people are selfish, fickle, and corrupt but among those people I’m not there.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    His writings are maddeningly and notoriously unsystematic, inconsistent and sometimes self-contradictory. He tends to appeal to experience and example in the place of rigorous logical analysis. Yet succeeding thinkers who more easily qualify as philosophers of the first rank did (and do) feel compelled to engage with his ideas, either to dispute them or to incorporate his insights into their own teachings. Machiavelli may have grazed at the fringes of philosophy, but the impact of his musings has been widespread and lasting. The terms “Machiavellian” or “Machiavellism” find regular purchase among philosophers concerned with a range of ethical, political, and psychological phenomena, even if Machiavelli did not invent “Machiavellism” and may not even have been a “Machiavellian” in the sense often ascribed to him.…

    • 1016 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Machiavelli thought human nature was two-dimensional. He saw humans as predictable, foreseeing their responses to the princes’ actions. Because humans are so unsophisticated in Machiavelli’s eye, they can only love or hate their prince, making them unable to see an intermediate to the good and bad in their ruler. Humans’…

    • 1205 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In Rockman, Scraping By, he talks about the ideas of Machiavelli. Machiavelli believed that self-interest is something to be harnessed. That human nature has always been negative and greedy. However, Rockman argued that self-interest depends on where they live and time period. Even though, we have seen that self interest has appeared in pre-capitalist societies, there has always been people that have been looking out for themselves and what will give them the biggest benefit. Human nature acts upon self-interest, it is a never ending cycle that keeps on going. If we want to see improvements in the society, then we must turn to greed to allow for the the improvements to happen.…

    • 113 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Machiavelli, a 15th ce writer and philosopher, had a negative and distrustful attitude towards mankind as he writes in his book “The Prince” about how to be the most effective ruler. His writing style throughout the book reflects that he was pessimistic towards man’s fortune.…

    • 358 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Introduction: Many people who have read The Prince by Niccoló Machiavelli were appalled by Machiavelli’s fierce and authorative tone he used to assert his ideas, especially his concept of how the ends justify the means, which slowly made people begin to criticize him and his book as immoral, wicked, and evil. For this reason, Machiavelli began to be insulted as a ruthless and evil person, or in the adopted term, a Machiavellian. Machiavelli didn’t wish to care for morals or spiritual integrity; however, he didn’t arrange to establish the approach to wickedness. As a matter of fact, he argues that the concept the ends justify the means are meant to be followed, but only when necessary commands for it to happen.…

    • 2621 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In his book The Prince, Machiavelli presents a theory asserting that man needs a powerful leader in order to be successful. Machiavelli felt that a Prince must act in a way that guaranteed stability and order. However, his emphasis on political convenience was not in the service of the individual power of a Prince, but in allowing that Prince to do what was necessary for the sake of the people. He argues that as a leader, one has the duty to be dishonest or otherwise deceive its people in times of need. This is further clarified when he addresses the question of whether it is better to be feared or loved.…

    • 841 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Human nature has been the discussion of many of philosophical works. There are some who believe human beings are inherently bad, individualistic and greedy. There are those who believe humans are inherently good and seek the best possible outcomes for society as a whole. Upon reading Niccolò Machiavelli’s The Prince, Karl Marx’s The Communist Manifesto, and John Locke’s Second Treatise of Government the audience may begin to understand how those ideas of human nature can have an effect on an individual’s political ideology. Machiavelli, Marx, and Locke all expressed in their works how they viewed human nature and gave historical background and evidence of how their opinions of human nature directly affected their political ideology and how…

    • 1869 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Machiavelli's the Prince

    • 1252 Words
    • 6 Pages

    "The state is the highest achievement of man, a progressive and elaborate creation of his free will. The individual, the leader, the people, cooperate in maintaining it." This idea of state was put forth by Niccolo Machiavelli in The Prince, which was in essence a ruler's handbook to governing and maintaining his land. Machiavelli conjured his theories for government by basing his ideas in his belief that men, especially men in power, tend to follow the same directions, and therefore by looking at past leaders and their follies we can better determine how to run a state. "Men are always the same and are animated by the same passions that lead them fatally to the same decisions, acts, an results…. That one can foresee the course of political development by mediating upon the cycles and phases of historical events, and that essential to a statesman is not only the experience of modern events and constant study of the past. But also the ability to exploit this knowledge in actual political actions."…

    • 1252 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Human nature is usually the manner in which individual’s of a certain society reason and act on that reason. The reasoning can be constructive or unconstructive to the institution as a whole. This concept of human nature is constantly seen in Thomas More’s Utopia and Machiavelli’s The Prince. Each believes human nature to be corrupt; however, More offers an alternative to correct such a problem while Machiavelli does not. Therefore, the creation of an ideal institution is not seen possible by one of these literary works. Both works do describe the community that is possible under certain circumstances.…

    • 1702 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Throughout history authors have had opposing views towards human nature. Writers such as John Locke and Karl Marx believe that humans are naturally good and put their trust in human nature. However, writers such as Machiavelli oppose these views and does not put trust in human nature because he believes humans are naturally evil. Locke focuses his writings on human rights, Marx describes the influences of the economy, and Machiavelli details his beliefs of government. Their perceptions of human nature influence their writing and their view of government.…

    • 1623 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Machiavelli's Cruelty

    • 1225 Words
    • 5 Pages

    According to Hobbes, causing harm without a cause creates an environment where a certain type of war thrives: cruelty (Hobbes 1996, 101)…

    • 1225 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Accordingly, it’s the primary goal of this brief article to differentiate the concepts of self-interest and selfishness: to praise the concept of self-interest as the catalyst of moral action, therefore worthy of admiration; and thus to admonish selfishness as the instigator which often leads to immorality and inconsiderate hedonism. Consequently, containing these two sentiments from one another in order to redeem the term self-interest and to specify its appropriateness becomes an intellectual…

    • 1077 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Lead with Example

    • 925 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Stability in a ruler’s morals and ethics are a vital asset to have when ruling a group of people. With similarities shared between the ruler and the common person the ruler will then be able to relate and be more respected amongst the population, as opposed to a ruler who rules with his own self interest at hand. In the piece, The Prince, Niccolò Machiavelli argues the many principles of how a prince should and should not rule. In order to rule successfully he states a prince must possess some of the following characteristics; morality, a strong army, strict rule, common ground with his people and also to be widely respected. Machiavelli laid the ground work for many rulers in the future with his modern view in a time where rulers were primitive and ruled through fear and terror. The Prince and its ideas can even be seen today in our modern day presidents and kings proving that Machiavelli had compelling ideas and arguments for how leaders can obtain and hold a position of power successfully.…

    • 925 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Both St. Augustine and Machiavelli believed that in order to understand the true nature of society you must see men for what they truly were. Augustine and Machiavelli are similar in their pessimistic views toward human nature, looking at human self-love and self-interest and believed it to be full of evil, cruelty, betrayal, violence and tied that relationship into the creation of war. For both philosophers a good society is actually something that for almost all men is an unreachable attribute that can only be written about and not actually fully experienced in my view. For Augustine I feel it is a truly heavenly earth where all men are divine and are as close to the city of Heaven as you can be on earth. For Machiavelli it is a state of complete acceptance of each man’s role and how that role fits into society like a puzzle piece. In order to examine each philosopher’s view further, we must break their thoughts into three separate categories which are: human nature, political authority, and religious beliefs. This essay will take an in-depth look at both St. Augustine and Machiavelli, compare and contrast their views, and provide evidence that on some level the two thinkers were very similar in their ideology.…

    • 2815 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Virtue of Generosity

    • 1014 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In Machiavelli’s point of view being generous is a good quality but you must keep in mind that you are going to have to know how to distinguish how generous you are going to be. In order to be considered a generous ruler you must have a lavish public display.In order for that to happen a prince must raise taxes and squeeze money from his subjects This kind of generosity benefits few oppose to benefiting many. Therefore the real questions the prince should ask himself are who should he be generous to since he cannot be generous to everyone at the same time? Or should he be generous at all? If he considers being generous and squeezes out money from his subjects then his subjects will not be happy about this and will start despising him and looking at him like a poor king. Now if he is generous to the people, then he has to ask himself how generous can he be to his people before they start demanding more? In Machiavelli’s view if he is a wise king he will not mind being called stingy or a miser because stinginess is a vice that allows him to have power. If a prince is giving other peoples properties away then he can afford to be generous if he is using his own property and resources to be generous then he is not a wise king at all and will become hated, poor, or despised.…

    • 1014 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics