Preview

Property Law Notes

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
22017 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Property Law Notes
PROPERTY LAW 2013

Contents

1. Rights Above and Below Land…………………………………………………….
3
2. Fixtures and Related Matters………………………………………………………
7
3. Co – Ownership…………………………………………………………………….
12
4. Easements…………………………………………………………………………..
26
5. Covenants…………………………………………………………………………..
35
6. Adverse Possession………………………………………………………………...
46
7. Native Title Legislation and Indigenous Land Rights Legislation………………...
60

1. Rights Above and Below Land

Cuius est solum eius usque ad coelom et ad inferos – the person who owns land, owns it from the heavens above to the centre of the earth below.

Above the land

Transient Intrusion
It is not considered trespass if it passes through the air without coming into contact with the surface.
However, Recent cases held that transient intrusions into airspace do constitute trespass. Davis v Bennison (1927) 22 Tas LR 52 at 56 held that to fire a bullet across another’s land constitutes a trespass, regardless of whether the bullet touches the surface
In Australia Bendal Pty Ltd v Mirvac Project Pty Ltd (1991)held that the intrusion of a crane jib into the airspace above land is a trespass

Permanent Intrusion
Permanent intrusions are considered trespass however, with the exceptions of telephone wires Wandsworth District Board of works v United Telephone co Ltd 1884 or advertising signs Kelson v Imperial Tobacco Co Ltd [1957]

Height Limitations
No action lies for trespass ‘by reason only of the flight of an aircraft over any property at a height above the ground, which, having regard to wind, weather, and all the circumstances of the case is reasonable, or ordinary incidents of such flight, so long as the provisions of the4 Air Navigation Regulations are duly complied with’.

Bernstein v Skyviews & General Ltd [1978]
‘where the flight of an aircraft ‘many hundreds of feet above the ground’ was held not to constitute a trespass. Griffith J held that a surface owner’s rights in the airspace

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The COE was not overstepping in its requirement of a permit because of its authority under the CWA. The wetland’s inclusion under the jurisdiction of the CWA was protected because of its adjacency to a navigable body of water, and the broad definition of “navigable” under the CWA. The Court ruled that the injunction and permit requirement did not constitute a taking, because of the respondent’s lack of compliance to apply for one. Also, the denial of a permit would not reduce the economic viability of RBH’s 80 acres by 100%. The court relied on scientific deference, because if this wetland could have a significant effect on the adjacent body of navigable water explicitly protected by the CWA, then it is subject to CWA jurisdiction.…

    • 665 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Cjs/250 Appendix D

    • 574 Words
    • 3 Pages

    A six foot fence secures the outer perimeter. Video surveillance is active on the north fence and inactive on the south. A manned guard station permits entrance into the outer perimeter from the west; an unmanned and unlocked gate permits entrance from the east. No Trespassing signs are posted at intervals upon the perimeter fence; Employees Only is posted on the gate. Visitors must obtain a pass at the guard station.…

    • 574 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    A mere trespass to land or personal property was not a crime at common law unless it was committed forcibly or maliciously.…

    • 1145 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    This scenario is clearly a burglary. Burglary is breaking and entering the dwelling of another at night with the intent to commit a felony. (Roger LeRoy Miller, 2008) Some of the factors that make this different from the other two scenarios is the fact that it was done at night and she broke in with the intent to get that laptop.…

    • 372 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Usyd Claw1001 Paper

    • 1128 Words
    • 5 Pages

    'Appellants were employed by the respondent as baggage handler at Sydney Airport, they were dismissed from their employment' for stealing funds. 'Appellants sought an order for imposition of penalty and payment of penalty to them.' Trial judge found out respondents in 'terminating the appellants’ employment was not harsh, unjust or unreasonable and dismissed the claims.' 'The Full Court held that it was contrary however appellants were still not entitled to damages for breach of contract.'…

    • 1128 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    QCF641 Written questions

    • 3735 Words
    • 12 Pages

    The main type of fencing is Harris fencing; this can be erected with ease and speed. It prevents access to the site but is only temporary and can be taken down as quickly as it can be put up. Harris fencing could also be blown over in a high wind. Harris fencing is not always necessary as existing fencing may already be in place. A garden fence, a garden wall or a hedgerow can be used to prevent access; they can be used on their own or in conjunction with fencing.…

    • 3735 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    If it can be shown that a trespass to land was warranted, a complete defense exists.…

    • 4685 Words
    • 31 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    W100

    • 939 Words
    • 4 Pages

    As specified in the Criminal Justice and Public Order Act 1994 Part V, section 61(1), a senior police officer can actually decide if someone is trespassing on land, or indeed by ‘any constable at the scene’ can also make this decision , section 61(3) refers.…

    • 939 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    taking of property that is in immediate possession of another, by force or the threat of…

    • 590 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Psychology at its Finest

    • 2903 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Section 1: “Whoever places on public or private property a sign, writing, symbol, object, characterization or graffiti, with the intent to intimidate or threaten another person, commits a class A misdemeanor.” (Pomerantz, pg 3).…

    • 2903 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Railroad essay

    • 410 Words
    • 2 Pages

    may come in contact with the trains or the tracks themselves. “Trespassing along railroad rights-…

    • 410 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In the case of Reeves vs Meridian Southern, it was alleged that Meridian Southern placed railcars on spurs without permission. Meridian had used this spur for years and years without incident till this case. Meridian Southern should have been informed by Reeves about the change of ownership. Trespassers are ones who enter another’s land unlawfully without consent or the privilege to be there. By this definition, Meridian Southern is trespassing Reeve’s land. This could have all been avoided if Meridian Southern would have asked for permission to use the spur. Even if they had to pay for the use of it.…

    • 101 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Legal Studies Notes

    • 37517 Words
    • 151 Pages

    The government must embody the concerns, expectations & interests of the people who voted them in last election and protect these interests in their law-making.…

    • 37517 Words
    • 151 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Decision: No. no evidence was produced that helicopters flying at this attitude are illegal. There is no reasonable expectation that the content of the respondent greenhouse were protected from public or official observation from the air since he left it roof open. From this the Florida Supreme Court reversed the Judgment.…

    • 379 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Yong Joo Lin

    • 531 Words
    • 3 Pages

    8. It was held by the learned Chief Justice that plaintiffs’ claim would be succeed if English law were applicable. However, in view of the provisions of the Land Code, the common law of England could not be applied. The alternative claim in trespass had not been established. Plaintiffs’ claim was accordingly dismissed, and they have appealed.…

    • 531 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics