Preview

Bugusa Case Senerio

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1005 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Bugusa Case Senerio
Case Scenario: Bugusa Inc

Introduction

BUGusa is a company that designs, manufactures, and sells electronic recording devices. These devices are very complicated and used by local police departments and the FBI. The devices are normally used to record sounds and noises through houses. Because these devices are highly sophisticated, BUGusa spends a lot of money to the do research and develop these devices. The huge investment that BUGusa spends to make such exceptional devices can be secluded in a lot of ways. These consist of trade secret protection, patenting their products, and even registering their trademark. These will each be discussed in detail all through this essay.

WIRETIME, Inc., Advertisement

WIRETIME, Inc., has advertisement that was published in a magazine containing statements that the electronic recording equipment that BUGusa, Inc.has was a low quality and did not work more than a month. The tort that was commited with the advertisement is a strict liability tort. The tortfeasor being BUGusa, Inc. is held liable for the quality of the equipment they have. Intentional tort would be committed also in that the tortfeasor is making it known to others about the type of equipment that is used.

WIRETIME, Inc. (Janet)

Janet works for the BUGusa, Inc. and is offered a job with WIRETIME, Inc. as a research and development head by the HR manager. Janet informed the WIRETIME, Inc. HR that she has a two-year contract with BUGusa, Inc. and the contract states that she is not to work for any competitors in the event that she is fired or chooses to leave BUGusa, Inc. The HR manager from WIRETIME, Inc. offers Janet a 10% increase over her current salary and a $5,000.00 signing bonus if she decides to join WIRETIME, Inc. Janet decides to resign and go work for WIRETIME, Inc. The intentional tort is being committed by WIRETIME, Inc. The tortfeasor being the WIRETIME, Inc. HR has offered Janet incentives to leave BUGusa and

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    bugusa worksheet

    • 491 Words
    • 3 Pages

    BUGusa, Inc., Worksheet Use the scenarios in the Bugusa, Inc., link located on the student website to answer the following questions. Scenario WIRETIME, Inc., Advertisement Has WIRETIME, Inc., committed any torts If so, explain. Scenario WIRETIME, Inc. (Janet) Has WIRETIME, Inc. committed any torts If so, explain. In this case Janet is working for BUGusa, the contract she signed will be valid for 2 more years. In the contract it states that Janet is not to work for any competitors wither it is if she breaks the contract by leaving the company or if she is fired. Both Janet and WIretime are guilty of breaking the contract. The Tort that has been committed is known as Current Contractual Relationship Tort. The more money and the incentive of the sign on bonus of five thousand dollars is an infringement of the contract Janet is affiliated with. Wiretime has committed a tort by enticing Janet to break her current contract. Scenario WIRETIME, Inc. (Steve and Walter) Discuss any liability BUGusa, Inc., may have for Walters actions. Scenario BUGusa, Inc., Plant Parking Lot What defenses may be available to BUGusa, Inc. Explain your answer. Scenario BUGusa, Inc. (Randy and Brian) What defenses may be available to BUGusa, Inc. Explain your answer. Scenario BUGusa, Inc. (Sally) Sally may have a successful case against BUGusa, Inc., for what torts Explain your answer. Bugusa, Inc. Worksheet LAW/421 Version 2 PAGE MERGEFORMAT 1 Y, dXiJ(x( I_TS 1EZBmU/xYy5g/GMGeD3Vqq8K)fw9…

    • 491 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Janet has signed a contract with BUGusa she is committing intentional tort because she is intentionally leaving one company knowing that she has an agreement. She is intentionally leaving them to go work for the competitor so that she can get more money. She can be held liable for any harm or money loss for BUGusa because she has left the department with a signed contract.…

    • 339 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Bugusa, Inc., Worksheet

    • 1035 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Disparaging statement made with either knowledge that the statement was false or reckless disregard for the truth. WIRETIME’s statement that BUG’s electronic recording devices are low quality and do not work reliably for longer than one month is reckless disregard for the truth. We have no proof referenced in this scenario ascertaining the truthfulness of WIRETIME’s statement, but we can demonstrate that they published this statement with malice, or reckless disregard for the truth, with the intent of making BUG’s customers believe that BUG manufactures a low quality, unreliable product, thus driving away BUG’s customers and influencing them to use WIRETIME’s product as an alternative.…

    • 1035 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Bugusa Case Study

    • 914 Words
    • 4 Pages

    A Tort was committed by WIRETIME, Inc. which means “a civil wrong where on party has acted, or in some cases failed to act, and that action or inaction causes a loss to be suffered by another party” (Melvin, S.P., 2011) The statement made by WIRETIME, Inc. will potentially harm Bugusa, Inc. reputation. A statement made by WIRETIME, Inc. accusing Bugusa, Inc. products were low quality and did not work past a months’ time. This type of statement is a defamatory “A false and defamatory…

    • 914 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Legt 1710 Assignment 1

    • 1249 Words
    • 5 Pages

    * Jones L Introduction to Business Law 1st, 2011, C11 the Tort Law of Negligence. P342…

    • 1249 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    BUGusa Inc. Worksheet

    • 1160 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In this scenario Janet breaches her contract and leaves BUGusa, Inc. for WIRETIME Inc. and that is not a tort (University of Phoenix, 2013). However, WIRETIME Inc. went after Janet by offering her a 10% pay increase and a $5,000 signing bonus. Because WIRETIME Inc.’s Human Resource manager knew that Janet was under contract and could not work for WIRETIME the act to employ Janet was an interference with contractual relations and that is a tort (Findlaw Inc., 1999). The defendant, WIRETIME, intentionally…

    • 1160 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Law 421

    • 822 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Wiretime, Inc. has committed business competition tort or interference tort. Janet has a non-compete clause in her contract with BUGusa, Inc., which is valid for additional years. Janet’s contract with BUGusa, Inc. states that she is not to work for a competitor while she is still employed with them, is fired from the company, or resigns. Wiretime, Inc. could be liable for damages because they intentionally interfered with a valid contractual relationship between Janet and BUGusa, Inc. (Zuber, 2009). Janet can also be liable for breaking her contract.…

    • 822 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Case Scenarios BUGusa Inc

    • 601 Words
    • 3 Pages

    WIRETIME interfered with a current contractual relationship in this case. WIRETIME knew of the agreement Janet had with BUGusa and convinced Janet to break the contractual agreement she has existing with her employer. Janet breached her contract with BUGusa by accepting a job working for WIRETIME. The contract stated Janet is not to work for BUGusa’s competitor for another two years, thus violating a non-compete clause.…

    • 601 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Tort Reform in the Us

    • 1193 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Tort law is a type of law that is designed to offer remedies to civil wrongs. Unlike contractual damages that occur, where responsibility is predetermined, tort law is designed for someone who is legally injured to be able to recover damages from the person who is deemed legally responsible, or liable for such injuries. Tort law is broken down into three main categories, negligence, strict liability, and intentional tort. In negligence tort one is accused of causing damages through their carelessness. After accusation of negligence the plaintiff must be able to show that the defendant had duty of care, and that a breach of duty had occurred that caused the damages. Strict liability is a legal doctrine that makes someone responsible for damages caused by their actions (e.g. product liability). Intentional tort is much like negligence, but instead of one causing damages by accident, there was reckless action or intent to cause the damages that occurred (e.g. assault, battery). Tort cases are based on common law, which is laws that have been developed through court decisions, i.e. precedent. However, in certain cases tort law can also be based on statutory law laid out by the legislature. It is up to the court to decide which rule should take a higher standing depending on the case.…

    • 1193 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A manufacture is liable to a consumer in tort even though there is a no contract between them, if fault can be established. Similarly, a manufacture is also liable for all the component parts from outside suppliers included in its product.…

    • 1179 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Schubert, F. A. (2012). Introduction to law and the legal system. Mason, Ohio: Cengage Learning.…

    • 1330 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    1. Whether the plaintiff was guilty of contributory negligence and assume the risk of particular accident?…

    • 488 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    employees can have a “reasonable expectation of privacy in their use of e-mail and internet” at…

    • 1089 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Article Review

    • 367 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The main legal issue brought up in this article is the need to protect intellectual property and some of the various ways things that can be set up to ensure that the property is not stolen and given to another company.…

    • 367 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Hopper, G.S (2006, April 1). Protecting Business Method Innovations: Patents Aren't the Only Way, Netanium Strategic Consulting, LLC. From, http://www.netanium.com/trade_secrets.html…

    • 393 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays

Related Topics