Balfour vs. Balfour Case Study
Law of contract
BALFOUR vs. BALFOUR [1919] 2K.B. 571
TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS 2. LIST OF CASES 3. FACTS OF THE CASE 4. ISSUES INVOLVED 5. CONTENTIONS 6. JUDGMENT 7. LAW POINT 8. BIBLIOGRAPHY
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS I. L.J. : Lord Justice II. AIR : All India Reporter III. QBD : Queen’s Bench Division IV. CBNS : Common Bench Report (New Series) V. AER :All England Reporter VI. CLR : Commonwealth Law Reports
LIST OF CASES
Cases referred to by the court of appeal in Balfour vs. Balfour: I. Eastland vs. Burchell (1878),3 Q.B.D. 432 II. Jolly vs. Rees (1864),15 C.B.N.S. 628 III. Debenham vs. Mellon (1880),6 App. Cas. 24
Cases having the same law point as Balfour vs. Balfour: I. Rose and Frank Co. vs. Crompton & Bros. Ltd. (1925) A.C. 445 II. Jones vs. Padavatton (1969) All E.R. 616 III. Meritt vs. Meritt (1970) 2 All E.R. 760 IV. S.V.R. Mudaliar vs. Rajababu AIR 1995 SC 1607.
Some recent case laws having the same law point: I. Ermogenous v Greek Orthodox Community of SA Inc
(2002) 209 CLR 95
Facts
Archbishop Ermogenous made a claim for payments he thought due for annual and long service leave from the Greek Orthodox Community. He succeeded at first instance but the Full Court of the Supreme Court of SA found there was no intention to create legal relations between the parties. An appeal was made to the High Court.
II. EDMONDS v LAWSON (2000)
FACTS OF THE CASE
After their marriage in August, 1900, the parties went to Ceylon, where the husband had a
BALFOUR vs. BALFOUR [1919] 2K.B. 571
TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS 2. LIST OF CASES 3. FACTS OF THE CASE 4. ISSUES INVOLVED 5. CONTENTIONS 6. JUDGMENT 7. LAW POINT 8. BIBLIOGRAPHY
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS I. L.J. : Lord Justice II. AIR : All India Reporter III. QBD : Queen’s Bench Division IV. CBNS : Common Bench Report (New Series) V. AER :All England Reporter VI. CLR : Commonwealth Law Reports
LIST OF CASES
Cases referred to by the court of appeal in Balfour vs. Balfour: I. Eastland vs. Burchell (1878),3 Q.B.D. 432 II. Jolly vs. Rees (1864),15 C.B.N.S. 628 III. Debenham vs. Mellon (1880),6 App. Cas. 24
Cases having the same law point as Balfour vs. Balfour: I. Rose and Frank Co. vs. Crompton & Bros. Ltd. (1925) A.C. 445 II. Jones vs. Padavatton (1969) All E.R. 616 III. Meritt vs. Meritt (1970) 2 All E.R. 760 IV. S.V.R. Mudaliar vs. Rajababu AIR 1995 SC 1607.
Some recent case laws having the same law point: I. Ermogenous v Greek Orthodox Community of SA Inc
(2002) 209 CLR 95
Facts
Archbishop Ermogenous made a claim for payments he thought due for annual and long service leave from the Greek Orthodox Community. He succeeded at first instance but the Full Court of the Supreme Court of SA found there was no intention to create legal relations between the parties. An appeal was made to the High Court.
II. EDMONDS v LAWSON (2000)
FACTS OF THE CASE
After their marriage in August, 1900, the parties went to Ceylon, where the husband had a
Bibliography: A. PRIMARY SOURCE [1918-19] All E.R. Rep. B. SECONDARY SOURCE Indian Contract Act –R.K. Bangia C. OTHER SOURCES www.indlaw.com www.indiankanoon.org http://www.australiancontractlaw.com