My Outlook on Peter Singer’s Article: “Famine‚ Affluence‚ and Morality” Amanda Ponshock PHI 208 Ethics and Moral Reasoning Instructor: Rachel Howell August 05‚ 2013 In his Peter Singer’s article‚ “Famine‚ Affluence and Morality”‚ he speaks of how he looks at ways one might think about charity and famine relief. Not everyone has accepted his general idea of how a person should act in these situations. I myself only agree with his views at a certain level. I believe that everyone should help
Premium Morality Ethics Judith Jarvis Thomson
newest technology or the best brand of electronics rather than helping out a person by just giving them a simple smile. Money is spent on things that are not worth spending that may be useful for another occasion. In the text‚ “The Singer Solution to World Poverty‚” Peter Singer persuades the readers on how many will have the opportunity to help out a charity and donate money‚ but people will not take the chance or time to do it. In the other text “On Dumpster Diving” Lars Eighner informs the readers when
Premium Poverty United States Health
11/29/12 Agriculture 3pd. Animal Rights vs. Animal Welfare When you think of the right way to treat wild and domesticated animals you’d think it’d be common sense. But in reality there are actually many more problems surrounding this extremely controversially topic than you’d think. The treatment of animals and justifying what is right and wrong has been a very big issue for a long time. Animals are used for many purposes in our society such as food‚ clothing‚ research‚ companionship and
Premium Animal rights Animal welfare
the world of animal cruelty‚ there are plenty of controversial issues surrounding this topic. Out of all of them‚ animal testing would be the most controversial topic in dealing with animal cruelty. Scientists have been doing animal testing for many years‚ using animals as their guinea pigs. There is a controversy on whether animal testing is right or wrong. On one side‚ the article “Animal Testing and Its Gift to Humans” by Frankie Trull talks about‚ as said in the title‚ how animal testing is helpful
Premium Animal testing Animal rights Testing cosmetics on animals
Utilitarianism Let me begin by defining Utilitarianism: utilitarianism is the belief of doing what is right for the greater number of people. It is a theory used to determine the usefulness of the happiest outcome and how it will affect everyone else. Now‚ this sounds like a amazing theory‚ what would be better than making yourself and others happy? I found myself at first agreeing with this theory up until I really looked into it. At first I found myself thinking that not everything is about
Free English-language films Human Utilitarianism
In Peter Singer’s “The Singer Solution to World Poverty”‚ Singer claims that the rich taste of people with money is starving children around the world. He also believes that if human beings have it to give‚ why don’t we give more to the people who have less. So‚ according to Singer‚ a possible solution to world poverty is for Americans to donate all extra income‚ which is not necessary for everyday living‚ to organizations that provide aid to other poor areas of the world. If more people donated
Premium Utilitarianism Ethics Donation
treatment to stop the growth of disabled children raised a lot of questions back in 2012. A good number of patients already implemented the treatment before it became public. Following this‚ Peter Singer wrote an article to criticize the legitimacy of the treatment. His essay‚ “The ’unnatural’ Ashley treatment can be right for profoundly disabled children‚” was meant to criticize the integrity of the treatment. His particular concern was the feelings of the children towards the treatment. Children subjected
Premium Disability Medicine Law
In his article on famine‚ affluence‚ and morality‚ morally Peter Singer states that people who live in rich countries are morally obligated to ease the burden of famine and overpopulation for poorer countries. Singer states that rich countries can alleviate unnecessary suffering and death in poor countries by giving famine relief‚ and at the cost of a “morally insignificant” lessening of standard of living for the rich country. Singer also notes that this giving of famine relief should not only occur
Premium
Animals deserve rights because just like humans‚ they feel excruciating pain‚ suffer and have feelings. One would argue that animals don’t experience emotions? But the answer is of course they do. It is emotions that allow animals to display various behavior patterns. According to the theory of utilitarianism‚ all sentient beings should be given consideration in the society and this includes both animals and humans. Also‚ animals cannot speak for themselves and for this reason they should be treated
Premium Animal rights Animal testing The Animals
“As I write this‚ in November 1971‚ people are dying in East Bengal from lack of food‚ shelter‚ and medical care” Singer stated. (Pojman 759) Peter Singer is an ethical and political philosophy that is well known for his founding movement of modern animal rights. (Peter Singer) Moreover‚ he believed that people who are suffering from lack of resources are morally bad‚ in this case Bengal. Besides‚ it is in our power to prevent something bad from occurring. So‚ Singer’s overall idea is that we have
Premium United States World War II World War I