Preview

experiment levels of memory

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
597 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
experiment levels of memory
Levels of Processing and memory

The aim of the experiment is to investigate (a) whether level of processing (IV1) affects memory for words, (b) whether the intention to learn (IV2) has an effect upon memory and whether an effect of level of processing on memory for words is dependent upon intentionality of learning (IV1xIV2), i.e. Is there an interaction effect?
Levels of Processing is an influential theory of memory proposed by Craik and Lockhart (1972) which rejected the idea of the dual store model of memory. This popular model postulated that characteristics of a memory are determined by it's "location" (ie, fragile memory trace in short term store [STS] and a more durable memory trace in the long term store [LTS]. Instead, Craik and Lockhart proposed that information could be processed in a number of different ways and the durability or strength of the memory trace was a direct function of the depth of processing involved. Moreover, depth of processing was postulated to fall on a shallow to deep continuum.
Shallow processing (e.g., processing words based on their phonemic and orthographic components) leads to a fragile memory trace that is susceptible to rapid forgetting. On the other had, deep processing (e.g., semantic or meaning based processing) results in a more durable memory trace.
Craik & Tulving conducted numerous experiments exploring he levels of processing. They concluded that deeper processing le to better memory. However, it could be that deep encoding tasks led to better memory simply because participants spend more time on encoding for them than for shallow task. Craik and Tulving explored this possibility by a more complex, factorial experiment in which two variables where manipulated: levels of processing and intentional learning.
DV/IV and Operational definitions
Our investigation employs a similar factorial design in which two variables are manipulated: the levels of processing and the intentional learning. The dependent

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Baddeley found that it was hard to recall acoustically similar words and semantically similar words in LTM. He concluded that encoding In LTM is mainly semantically and the encoding of STM Is mainly acoustic.…

    • 287 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The researchers argued that shallow processing focuses on the superficial features of the information (e.g. whether a word is in upper or lower case) resulting in a fragile memory trace with the information unlikely to be stored for very long. The LOP model challenges the importance of rehearsal as being the only way in which STM may be transferred to LTM. Craik and Lockhart point out that long-term memories are laid down every day without being rehearsed. Their levels of processing model suggests it is everyday information (with meaning or importance) rather than repeated processing (repetition) which is the key to LTM. While shallow processing focuses on the superficial features of the information and is unlikely to be remembered, deep (semantic) processing focuses on the meaning of the information and is generally more likely to be remembered.…

    • 555 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    According to Atkinson and Shiffrin the multi-store memory has 3 distinctive stores; sensory registry, short term memory (STM) and long term memory (LTM). Information from the environment enters the sensory memory for 0.5 second, if the individual is paying attention this information will enter the STM, from there if the information is rehearsed it will be store into the LTM. Duration is how long the memory lasts, capacity is how much memory an individual can store, encoding is what format it is stores in for example some are stored by sounds, this called acoustic. Some people remember semantically because they associate information with the meaning as information is well remembered if it is better understood.…

    • 570 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Primary memory was thought to be different from secondary memory. This was shown by different characteristics such as how forgetting happens, how our memories are represented, and the amount of information that can be stored at one time (Willingham, 2007). It was discovered that primary memory was much more complex.…

    • 732 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    AP Psych

    • 629 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In the levels-of-processing model of memory, information that gets more deeply processed is more likely to be remembered.…

    • 629 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    PROACTIVE INTERFERENCE: The disruptive effect of prior learning on the recall of new information. (Past learning affects new…

    • 1113 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    * Levels of processing theory- proposes that deeper levels of processing results in us remembering information for a longer period of time…

    • 870 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    1 (b) Outline the difference between the capacity of short-term memory and the capacity of…

    • 367 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Psuedo-Word – a combination of letters that sound as though it could be an English word, but actually does not exist (e.g. nym)…

    • 683 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Koriat, A., Lichtenstein, S., & Fischhoff, B. (1980). Reasons for confidence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learn- ing & Memory, 6, 107–118.…

    • 8510 Words
    • 35 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Campione, J. C., Brown, A. L., & Bryant, N. (1985). Individual differences in learning and memory. In…

    • 452 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Sternberg Search

    • 12556 Words
    • 51 Pages

    Robert S. Lockhart and Hergus l.M. Craik University of Toronto ABSTRACT The influence on memory research of levels of processing (Craik & I^ockharl, 1972) is reviewed, and a number of conceptual and empirical criticisms are evaluated. Research since 1972 has enabled the original formulation of depth of processing to be refined in various ways, and the concepts of elaboration and distinctiveness of encoding are discussed as examples of this refinement. It is concluded that, despite change and development, many of the original ideas of levels of processing have survived and that as a research framework it has been substantially successful in encouraging the building of a dala base that can serve as a foundation for future theory construction. RKSUMK I/influence des niveaux de traitcment sur la recherche touchanl la memoire (Craik & Lockhart, 1972) est passcc en revue et un certain nombre de critiques concepluelles el empiriques sont cvaluees. La recherche depuis 1972 a pcrmis de ralfiner de maintcs facons la formulation originale de la profondeur de traitemenl el les concepts dc I'claboralion et dc clarte de codage sont discutes comme cxemple de raffinement. L'on arrive a la conclusion que malgre le changement ct le developpcnicnt, nombreuses sont les idees originates quant aux niveaux dc traitcment qui ont survecu et que, en tant quc cadre dc recherche, ccs idces ont eu un certain succes a encouragcr I'acquisition dc donnces qui peuvent servir de fondalions pour la construction dc futures theories. The levels of processing framework proposed by Craik and Lockhart (1972) presented a general approach to memory research that has been widely influential and the subject of intensive critical scrutiny. The purpose of the present article is to offer some retrospective…

    • 12556 Words
    • 51 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    2. In the multiple store theory of memory there are three different storage areas within the brain. Sensory memory is where the five senses are put to use and it has unlimited capacity like iconic and echoic storage and has different storage mechanism. However, the duration of sensory memory is very limited. Work bench memory is an area of the brain where information is stored for long-term memory and retrieval. In the same way, work bench memory has limited duration but not as nearly limited as sensory memory. Unlike sensory memory, work benched memory has limited capacity, long-term memory works very closely with work bench memory but like sensory memory it has unlimited capacity. On the other hand, long-term has unlimited duration, semantic meaning, and associative network.…

    • 525 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Scientists and psychologists have studied the topic of learning for more than a century, and merely scratched the surface of how the brain functions in respect to learning and cognition. Factors, such as learning is a basic function of human beings, and humans are born with specific innate abilities, however it is still somewhat of a mystery how the process of learning is accomplished. Within this essay, a definition of learning, the component of behavior concerning learning, two diverse methods of learning, and the affiliation linking learning and cognition will be examined.…

    • 952 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    It was concluded that deep processed memories, as in the way that certain distinguishing features of a coin or other everyday familiar objects are easier to retrieve than details of the same object that do not hold as much relevance and thus shallowly processed within the memory.…

    • 1532 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays