A Meta-Analysis of the Relationships Between Individual Job Satisfaction and Individual Performance

Topics: Job satisfaction, White-collar worker, Industrial and organizational psychology Pages: 20 (5049 words) Published: October 26, 2010
A Meta-Analysis of the Relationships between Individual Job Satisfaction and Individual Performance Author(s): M. M. Petty, Gail W. McGee, Jerry W. Cavender Source: The Academy of Management Review, Vol. 9, No. 4 (Oct., 1984), pp. 712-721 Published by: Academy of Management Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/258493 Accessed: 20/10/2010 04:45 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use, available at http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp. JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use provides, in part, that unless you have obtained prior permission, you may not download an entire issue of a journal or multiple copies of articles, and you may use content in the JSTOR archive only for your personal, non-commercial use. Please contact the publisher regarding any further use of this work. Publisher contact information may be obtained at http://www.jstor.org/action/showPublisher?publisherCode=aom. Each copy of any part of a JSTOR transmission must contain the same copyright notice that appears on the screen or printed page of such transmission. JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.

Academy of Management is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to The Academy of Management Review.


0Academy of Management Review, 1984, Vol 9, No. 4, 712-721.


Meta-Analysis of Between Individual and Individual

the Relationships Job Satisfaction Performance1


Universityof Alabama
literature Thecorrelational the concerning relationships betweenindividual job satisfactionand individual performancewasanalyzed,usingthe metaanalysistechniquesof Hunter, Schmidt,and Jackson (1982). Higher and more consistentcorrelationsbetweenoveralljob satisfactionand performancewereindicated thanthosepreviouslyreported. Relationships between JDI measuresof job satisfactionand performancewerenot as high or as consistent thosefound betweenoverall satisfaction performance. as job and Perhaps the most controversial issue that has evolved from decades of research on employee attitudes and employee behavior is the job satisfactionjob performancerelationship. More than two decades of organizational research have been devoted to understanding the satisfaction-performance relationship; yet, the issue has remained unresolved. Although empirical efforts to unravel the satisfactionperformance dilemma have diminished in recent years, the controversy has remained alive (Johns, 1983; Schermerhorn, Hunt, & Osborn, 1982; Steers, 1981). The decline in the growth rate of labor productivity during the last two decades (Capdevielle, Alvarez, & Cooper, 1982) in combination with the results of two national surveys of American workers that have indicated a widespread decline in job satisfaction (Cooper, Morgan, Foley, & Kaplan, 1979; Quinn & Staines, 1978) also have intensified interest in the nature of the relationship.

to the satisfaction-performance relationship:
1. Satisfactioncauses performance (s-p) 2. Performancecauses satisfaction(p-s) 3. The satisfaction-performancerelationship is moderatedby a numberof other variables.

SatisfactionCauses Performance Theviewpoint satisfaction that causesperformance has its roots in human relations theory, which emerged from the Hawthorne studies of the late 1920sand early 1930s(Filley, House, & Kerr, 1976; Schwab& Cummings,1970).Vroomstatedthat "it wastypically assumedby mostpeopleassociated with the humanrelationsmovementthatjob satisfaction was positivelyassociatedwith job performance.In fact human relationsmight be describedas an attemptto increase productivity satisfying...

References: Abdel-Halim. A. A. Effects of higher order need strength on the job performiiance-job satisfaction relationship. Personnel PsYchology. 1980. 33, 335-347. Baird. L. S. Relationship of performance to satisfaction in stimulatincg and nonstimulating jobs. Journal of Applied PsYchology, 1976, 61, 721-727. Beehr. T. A.. WN 'alsh, T., & Taber, T. D. Relationship of stress J. to individually and organizationally valued states. Journal of .4pplied Psychology, 1976, 61, 41-47. Ben-Porat. A. Event and agent: Toward a structural theory of job satisfaction. Personnel Psychology, 1981, 34, 523-534. Bhagat, R. S. Conditions under which stronger job performancejob satisfaction relationships may be observed. Academy of .Uanagement Journal, 1982, 25, 772-789. Blanchard, K., & Johnson, S. The one minute manager, New York: William Morrow, 1982. Brayfield, A. H., & Crockett, W. H. Employee attitudes and employee performance. Psychological Bulletin, 1955, 52, 396-424. Breaugh, J. A. Relationships between recruiting sources and employee performanceand work attitudes. Academyn Manageof ment Journal, 1981, 24, 142-147. Brief, A. P., & Aldag, R. J. Correlates of role indices. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1976, 61, 468-472. Capdevielle, P., Alvarez, D., & Cooper, B. International trends in productivity and labor costs. M1onthlyLabor Review, 1982, 105 (12), 3-14. Carlson, R. E. Degree of job fit as a moderator of the relationship between job performance and job satisfaction. Personnel Psychology, 1969, 22, 159-170. Cooper, M. R., Morgan, B. S., Foley, P. M., & Kaplan, L. B. Changing employee values: Deepening discontent? Harvard Business Review, 1979, 57 (1), 117-125. Doll, R. E., & Gunderson, E. K. E. Occupational group as a moderator of the job satisfaction-job performance relationship. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1969, 53, 359-361. Dreher, G. F. Predicting the salary satisfaction of exempt employees. Personnel Psychology, 1981, 34, 579-589. Ewen, R. B. Pressure for production, task difficulty, and the correlation between job satisfaction and job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1973, 58, 378-380. Filley, A. C., House, R. J., & Kerr, S. Managerial process and organizational behavior. Glenview, Ill.: Scott, Foresman, 1976. Fisher, C. D. On the dubious wisdom of expecting job satisfaction to correlate with performance. Academy of Management Review, 1980, 5, 607-612. Fulk, J., & Wendler, E. R. Dimensionality of leader-subordinate interactions:A path-goal investigation. OrganizationalBehavior and Human Performance, 1982, 30, 241-264. Greene, C. N. Causal connections among managers ' merit pay, job satisfaction and performance, Journal of Applied Psychology, 1973, 58, 95-100. Herman, J. B. Are situational contingencies limiting job attitudejob performance relationships? Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 1973, 10, 208-224. Hunter, J. E., Schmidt, F. L., & Jackson, G. B. Meta-analysis: Cumulating researchfindings across studies. Beverly Hills, Cal.: Sage, 1982. Inkson, J. H. K. Self-esteem as a moderator of the relationship between job performance and job satisfaction. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1978, 63, 243-247.
Ivancevich, J. M., & McMahon, J. T. The effects of goal setting, external feedback and self-generated feedback on outcome variables. Academy of Management Journal, 1982, 25, 359-372. Jacobs, R., & Solomon, T. Strategies for enhancing the prediction of job performance from job satisfaction. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1977, 62, 417-421. Johns, G. Organizational behavior. Glenview, Ill.: Scott, Foresman, 1983. Kesselman, G. A., Wood, M. T., & Hagen, E. L. Relationships between performanceand satisfaction under contingent and noncontingent reward systems. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1974, 59, 374-376. Lawler, E. E., & Porter, L. W. The effects of performance on job satisfaction. Industrial relations, 1967, 7, 20-28. Lopez, E. M. Test of the self-consistency theory of the job performance-job satisfaction relationship. Academy of Management Journal, 1982, 25, 335-348. Nord, W. R. Attitudes and performance. In W. R. Nord (Ed.), Concepts and controversy in organizational behavior. Glenview, Ill.: Scott, Foresman, 1976. Organ, D. W. A reappraisal and reinterpretation of the satisfaction causes performance hypothesis. Academy of Management Review, 1977, 2, 46-53. Ouchi, W. G. Theory Z. New York: Avon, 1981. Peters, T. J., & Waterman R. H. In search of excellence. New York: Harper and Row, 1982. Podsakoff, P. M., Todor, W. D., & Skov, R. Effects of leader contingent and noncontingent reward and punishment behaviors on subordinate performance and satisfaction. Academy of Management Journal, 1982, 25, 810-821. Quinn, R. P., & Staines, G. L. The 1977 quality of employment survey. Ann Arbor, Mich.: University of Michigan Survey Research Center, 1978.
Schermerhorn, J. R., Hunt, J. G., & Osborn, R. N. Managing organizational behavior. New York: Wiley, 1982. Schwab, D. P., & Cummings, L. L. Theories of performance and satisfaction: A review. Industrial Relations, 1970, 9, 408-430. Sheridan, J. D., & Slocum, J. W. The direction of the causal relationship between job satisfaction and work performance. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 1975, 14, 159-172. Smith, P. C., Kendall, L. M., & Hulin, C. L. The measurement of satisfaction in work and retirement. Chicago: Rand McNally, 1969. Slocum, J. W. Motivation in managerial levels: Relationship of need satisfaction to job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1971, 55, 312-316. Spencer, D. G., & Steers, R. M. Performance as a moderator of the job satisfaction-turnover relationship. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1981, 66, 511-514. Steers, R. M. Effects of need for achievement on the job performance-job attitude relationship. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1975, 60, 678-682. Steers, R. M. Introduction to organizational behavior. Glenview, Ill.: Scott, Foresman, 1981. Tharenou, P., & Harker, P. Organizationalcorrelates of employee self-esteem. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1982, 67, 797-805. Triandis, H. C. A critique and experimental design for the study of the relationship between productivity and job satisfaction. Psychology Bulletin, 1959, 56, 309-312. Vroom, V. H. Work and motivation. New York: Wiley, 1964. Wanous, J. P. A causal-correlational analysis of the job satisfaction and performance relationship. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1974, 59, 139-144.
M. M. Petty is Professor of Management in the Graduate School of Business, University of Alabama. Gail W. McGhee is Assistant Professor of Management, University of Alabama in Birmingham. Jerry W. Cavender is a doctoral candidate in the Graduate School of Business, University of Alabama.
Continue Reading

Please join StudyMode to read the full document

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Relationship Between Job Performance and Job Satisfaction Essay
  • Relationship Between Job Satisfaction and Job Performance and Absenteeism Essay
  • Link Between Job Satisfaction and Job Performance Essay
  • Relationship between Job Satisfaction and Turnover Intentions: An Empirical Analysis Essay
  • Working Life of Individuals with High Levels of Job Satisfaction Essay
  • The Relationship Between Job Satisfaction and Employee Turnover Rate Essay
  • Employee Job Satisfaction and Performance Research Paper
  • Job Satisfaction and Employees Performance Essay

Become a StudyMode Member

Sign Up - It's Free