Preview

A Comparison of the Writings of Machiavelli and Lao Tzu

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
514 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
A Comparison of the Writings of Machiavelli and Lao Tzu
)Compare Lao-tzu’s view of government with of Machiavelli in the next selection. Consider what seem to be the ultimate purposes of government, what seem to the obligations of the leader to the people being led, and what seems to be the main work of the state. What comparisons can you make between Lao-tzu’s Master and Machiavelli’s Prince.

Summary: The writings of Machiavelli and Lao Tzu indicate that they would disagree most strongly on the concept of how a government should run. Machiavelli believed that in strong government control by a prince who acted more in terms of practicality and maintaining power than through moral principles. Lao Tzu, on the other hand, took a more individualistic, carefree approach, believing that a ruler will be respected and followed if he does not act powerfully and force rules and issues.
Perhaps the most distinct differences between Machiavelli's and Lao-Tzu's are their beliefs in how a government should be run. Whereas Machiavelli writes about the qualities a prince should have while instilling a totalitarian government, Lao-Tzu strongly believes that one cannot have total control, so everything should run its course.
Machiavelli believes that a government should be very structured, controlled, and powerful. He makes it known that the only priorities of a prince are war, the institutions, and discipline. His writings describes how it is more important for a prince to be practical than moral. This is shown where he writes, "in order to maintain the state he is often obliged to act against his promise, against charity, against humanity, and against religion" (47). In addition, Machiavelli argues that a prince may have to be cunning and deceitful in order to maintain political power. He takes the stance that it is better for the prince to be feared than loved. His view of how a government should run and his unethical conduct are both early signs of dictatorship.
Lao-Tzu's political philosophy falls into more of an

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Though often presented as two ideological opposites, personally I find there to be a lot more similarities between Plato and Machiavelli than usually acknowledged. Obviously there are some sharp contrasts. If one examines the excerpts from Machiavelli’s “The Prince” and Plato’s “The Republic”, it’s easy to conclude that Plato believed it to be essential for a government leader to be just, good, and free from corruption. Whereas Machiavelli’s ideal ruler is less concerned about morality, and more about shrewdness, awareness, and pragmatism.. That being said, ultimately both men arrive to the same conclusion all be it through different means; that a ruler’s primary objective is to create and maintain a unified, orderly, and controlled state, with a content population.…

    • 592 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Dr. Martin Luther King and Machiavelli, great philosophical minds of their respective times, differed in their opinions of many issues. Their opinions on these issues can be gathered from their literary works. Yet, despite being near-diametrically opposed to each other, King and Machiavelli did agree on certain things.…

    • 276 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Tzu Vs Confucius

    • 921 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Lao Tzu's and Confucius political views disagree regarding social regulation. Lao Tzu believed in individuality, natural goodness, and inaction by the government towards its subjects. Confucius deals with social matters and social regulation in governance. He emphasizes on education and mentorship. In general, Confucius’ views were more inclined toward the philosophy of governance and social etiquette, while Lao Tzu concentrated on the philosophy of life and existence to the political…

    • 921 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Lao Tzu Research Paper

    • 657 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Lao Tzu idea and concept of what makes a proper leader and how the government should work is extremely different than Niccolo Machiavelli. Lao Tzu's view is the ruler believes that to gain respect and love from people, you should give them their freedom, don't force rules on them or even act powerfully. But at the same time Machiavelli's view of the good leader is that the prince should maintain his power by having a powerful and structured government and strong rules so he could have an overall control over the people and the country. But Lao Tzu opinion is that you cannot have a total control over the people because he sees that the world will govern itself. Machiavelli thinks that he should be underhand, wiliness and dictator so he can maintain…

    • 657 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Machiavelli and Hobbes understood the natural state of the world to be conflict. How does this shape their understanding of human beings, politics, ethics, and morality? Does this idea and itself towards liberal or conservative ideas? Explain.…

    • 1716 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    I think Plato and Machiavelli are known as two orominent philosphers.Who brought out the creativity in the political life.Both them have many simiilarites in between them.The first similarity in them is that Plato wants only the best should be the head of the etate in his view socartes are the best suitable for that job where as Machiavelli thinks that the prince should be the head of the state because he think mostly price are capaable of doing many things which other people can not.Both Plato and Machiavelli agree on that leader should know what he is doing he should have knowledge about what he is doing.Both beilve that ruler should have complete power for making decisions.…

    • 891 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Machiavelli Discourses

    • 1152 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Within the Machiavelli’s Republic, a prince should be the sole authority of the state and should have a main part in determining every aspect of the state and the policies being established by the state. The best interests of the prince are gaining, maintaining, and expanding his political powers or views. Since the prince is the sole authority, he has the power over everything and everyone. Machiavelli speaks about this in his books The Prince and The Discourses.…

    • 1152 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Two leaders by the names of Lao Tzu and Niccolo Machiavelli had two opinions on how one should lead their people. To be a leader, one must guide in the way they think is the best way to live. As humans, love and fear is something that surrounds us in our day to day life. Some, like Lao Tzu prefer to show love and to be loved, while some, like Niccolo Machiavelli, have the preference to be feared. To be loved means to be cherished, and that was Lao Tzu’s goal as a leader. To be feared means to be frightened, just like Niccolo Machiavelli was viewed. Lao Tzu and Niccolo Machiavelli share their common differences, but also…

    • 924 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Lao Tzu Analysis

    • 725 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Lao Tsu, a Chinese author named Li Erh , was known for his writing “Tao te Ching.” In Lao Tzu’s “Tao-te Ching” he says “ nonsense makes perfect sense” (214) He states that leaders should practice non doing concept to govern their counties, and ambition and desire will cause unstable life. Also, he mentions that leaders only use weapons for utmost restraint. His philosophy displays the ways which people can not note, makes meaningful senses. However, a lot of people criticize that it is incredible to be no change because changes are the opportunities to improve. Although Lao Tsu indicates that the best leader should use a practicing no doing concept, emptying people’s desire…

    • 725 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Citizens rely on their leaders to solve problems in a quick and easy way. They will then label a leader good or bad based on the conclusion of the problem they were faced with instead of allowing the leader to earn or downgrade to a title. Leaders should be labeled properly with their characteristics, they demonstrate while leading. The traits of virtue, fortune, and power politics play a powerful role in how effective of a leader someone is. If a leader misuse these traits then he will not be as effective of a leader.…

    • 741 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Machiavelli was a political observer – he drew conclusions based on the historical evidence and experiences of past leaders and compiled all that he had learned into a manual, or handbook, titled The Prince, which at that time was generally a ‘how-to’ essay for princes on how to attain power and maintain power. Instead of constructing ideas of how things should be in a theoretical or imaginary world, Machiavelli much preferred a realistic analysis of how things actually were in the real world. Machiavelli was a firm believer that the best way to achieve power and to keep it was to follow the advice and actions of those who had succeed, and to avoid the actions of those who had failed – one must refrain from repeating the past mistakes of…

    • 918 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Lao-Tzu Leadership Style

    • 560 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In conclusion, Lao-Tzu philosophical document is a great illustration of the qualities a great political leader should obtain. Following the words of the Tao can not only benefit one as a leader but a country as a whole. Some may say that force is necessary when it comes to leading a country, however as Lao-Tzu says, “for every force there is a counterforce” (208). With that being said, using force would result into an ongoing cycle of conflict. After all, a great leader is not one who is fear, but one who is…

    • 560 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Shakespeare Vs Machiavelli

    • 1114 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Machiavelli emphasizes that it is impossible for the prince to satisfy everybody's expectations in society and therefore it is inevitable that he will disappoint some of his people. In order for a prince not to be virtuous, he must have the notion of the greater good for the people in mind. Machiavelli offers a perspective on the realities and not the ideals of political manipulation and morality. “I have thought it proper to represent things as they are in real truth, rather than as they are imagined…the fact is that a man who wants to act virtuously in every way necessarily comes to grief among many who are not virtuous.…

    • 1114 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    * Understanding of goodness of Philosopher Kings and Machiavelli’s Prince citizens and their characters and also essay question asks about two distinctive types of rulers so comparison of the two sides in terms of types of rule. Two different views exist between Plato and Machiavelli, both having different ideas on virtues, structure of government, and role of populace.…

    • 284 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Jessica B

    • 549 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Since all governments are either republics or principalities, Machiavelli noted, their people will be accustomed either to managing their own affairs or to accepting the leadership of a prince. (For that reason, the safest princes are those who inherit their rule over people used to the family.) A wise leader, however, will be able to assume problems long before they actually arise, using virtù to forestall what would otherwise be great difficulties. Whatever vitality a former republic may have, then, Machiavelli counselled that it either be destroyed or ruled carefully by a resident prince.…

    • 549 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics