Preview

Why is it so hard for organizations to manage change?

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
832 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Why is it so hard for organizations to manage change?
Why is it so hard for organizations to manage change?

Jick (1993) defines change as "a planned or unplanned response to pressure and forces. Change is inevitable and organizations, which do not respond to change, are likely to struggle and may eventually, die. Change however can be painful and therefore needs to be managed, as the empirical evidence points to approximately 66% of major changes as failures. Fortune 500 executives claim that this is not because of a lack of resources but resistance to the change. Managing change will facilitate the achievement of strategic goals of the organization, which is its primary focus.

Change in an organization is influenced by two opposing forces: one that drives for change and one that resists. Driving forces may be external or internal e.g. a company's source of funding is being increased or decreased or there is pressure to use technology while the resisting forces are usually internal e.g. group fears new ideas and prefers to do things the way they have always been done. In accordance with Lewin's (1951) force field model this equilibrium must be disturbed in a planned way in order to bring about change.

Resistance to change may be experienced from two sources the organization and the individual.

Organizations, their various departments and subsidiaries are often as resistant to change as individuals frequently through their:

Design- a highly bureaucratic where there is little delegation of responsibility and autonomy for employees would not readily lend itself to change and systems such as JIT and TQM.

Culture - highly authoritarian and bureaucratic cultures are difficult to change

Resource limitations- the resources required may be considerable and unavailable

Inter - organizational agreements - these may prevent the organization from implementing any change which might be seen as a breach to the agreement

Individuals resist because of:

Fear of the unknown- change can be uncomfortable and awkward and

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Best Essays

    Hrm 587 Final Project

    • 6455 Words
    • 26 Pages

    Robison, Jennifer. Overcoming the Fear of Change. Gallup Management Journal Online, Van de Ven, Andrew and Sun Kangyong. (2003). Breakdowns in Implementing Models of Organization Change.Academy of Mangement Perspectives.…

    • 6455 Words
    • 26 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Consulting Proposal 1

    • 1203 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Jick, T., & Peiperl, M. (2008). Managing Change: Cases and Concepts (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill Higher Education ;.…

    • 1203 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    U010A1 Final Paper

    • 3116 Words
    • 13 Pages

    Change management entails thoughtful planning, sensitive implementation and involvement of the people affected by the change. Since managing change in organizations requires adhering to personal as well as the organizational needs of the people involved in the change, it should be holistic, achievable and measurable. Utilizing these principles of change will require reevaluating how we propose change management strategies as it relates to business decisions and processes. If you force change on people, problems will arise and resistance to change processes will build (businessballs.com).…

    • 3116 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Technology is forcing organizations to change, sometimes rapidly, if they are to survive in today’s world. Thanks to advanced communication, globalization, and computerization, these changes must be anticipated and accepted as the new norm. Understanding, accommodating, and using change are now part of a manager’s job requirement. Resisting the reality of change will lead to conflict, reduced performance, job dissatisfaction, decreased morale, and increased turnover (Ivancevich, Konopaske, & Matteson, p.7-9). In The Heart of Change, John Kotter and Dan Cohen interview hundreds of successful leaders to identify the key to successful change. According to Kotter and Cohen,…

    • 1894 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Resistance to change comes along quite a bit in all organizations; and individuals are comfortable with what he or she knows. Organizations are constantly struggling with combating resistance to change, and all the while keeping individuals ideas and concerns in mind. In order to make things a little easier Lewin’s theory can be used, to make this transition to change a little easier. There is also organizational and individual resistance, and what major factors can cause resistance to change. Resistance to change can be managed, and how it does solely relies on the organization. Organizations have a lot to cope with on a daily basis, and when changes are made this impacts the company as a whole. Many things can contribute to resistance to change, and listed below are factors organizations face when changes are implemented.…

    • 1428 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Theories of change describe the effectiveness with which organizations are able to modify their strategies, processes, and structures. The rate of major organizational change has accelerated dramatically in this decade. Experts have estimated that 30 years ago, the largest companies typically had only one or two simultaneous enterprise-wide change initiatives; however, according to a corporate executive board CEB organizational research available today: A typical organization has undertaken five major firm-wide changes in the past three years; 73% of the organizations expect a greater number of changes over the next three years; only 34% of the organizations are clearly successful at managing change. Major change initiatives are not limited to big companies. According to the society human resource management SHRM (2007) change-management survey report, 80% of organizations had planned or implemented major organizational initiatives requiring change management during the previous 24 months. Different organizations use different organizational change models to remain competitive in the marketplace (e.g., the positive model; the action research model; Lewin's model; Kanter, Stein, and Jick, 1992; Kotter's model, 1996; and Luecke model, 2003) all of these studies showed that leadership is the key factor for the process of change. As change initiatives have become more frequent and widespread, the importance of managing individuals through change has gained credence. Many corporate leaders have concluded that failing to manage employees through change can be costly. Employees who are dissatisfied with or upset by a change are generally less…

    • 412 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Lack of trust: A basic reason for resistance to change is distrust of the people that proposed it. Even if there is no obvious threat, “a change may be resistant if people imagine hidden, ominous implications that will only become obvious at a later time (Leadership in Organizations (2006) Leading Changes in…

    • 1780 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Organizational forces exist that help to change the form and function of the system over time for survival of the system. These forces produce instrumental change in how things are done.…

    • 266 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    “The primary objective of change is to ensure the future competitive sustainability of an organization” (Borkowski, 2005, p. 391). The phases in organizational change are unavoidable, regardless if they have positive or negative results. A case study can demonstrate that a planned organizational change process will lead to the change success. In this paper, the case presented will demonstrate the importance of completing and implementing the phases of this process.…

    • 582 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    This model is based on the theory that planned organizational change can occur by changing the behavior and attitudes of employees. These changes occur from three distinct stages. The first stage of this model is about getting ready to change. It involves getting to a point of understanding that change is necessary and getting ready to move away from the status quo. The second stage is to change what needs to be changed. This is a challenging stage because people are unsure and fearful of making the actual change. The third stage is about making the change permanent once the changes in stages one and two have been made. Within stage one of this model, Lewin developed a tool called the force field analysis to help organizations analyze certain aspects of changes that may lead to resistance [ (Kurt Lewin Change Management Model, 2008-2010)…

    • 1399 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Od of Whole Food Market

    • 1749 Words
    • 7 Pages

    This model uses an organizational diagnosis to identify driving forces affecting a company (Falletta, 2005). Force Field analysis enables a company to identify what causes change and what hinders change within a certain organization. This will allow an organization to develop measures that will allow the organizations driving forces to be maximized while the restraining forces are at the same time limited to allow the organization to be more efficient. The drawback to this model is that it is extremely simple and is not the best model for defining specific problems it more or less will allow a company to reach a desired state of affairs and nothing else.…

    • 1749 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    One of the cornerstone models for understanding organizational change was a development by a physicist and social scientist Kurt Lewin in the 1940’s. His change model is Unfreeze – Change – Refreeze, which describes the three phases of change. The Lewin model is best shown in an analogy of changing the shape of a block of…

    • 2003 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Best Essays

    According to (Kotter & Schlesinger, 1979) employees may resist change for several reasons such as self-interest, lack of understanding, lack of trust in management deferring assessments of the need for change, and a general low tolerance for change (Baack, 2012 Sec. 10.4 Para. 2). The only thing that is consistent about change is change. Change affects individuals in different ways; some may welcome it while others may struggle with it. Change is a step process of growth that we all must treasure and respect as it will surely happen. Change can be positive for an organization, and one must confront it as it provides us the ability to create value-added services for the organization and the public.…

    • 1571 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Resistance to Change

    • 514 Words
    • 3 Pages

    An individual is likely to resist change for many reasons. Some of these include, uncertainty, concern over personal loss, and the belief that the change is not in the organization’s best interest. Employees in organizations often hold a dislike for uncertainty. The second cause of resistance is the fear of losing something already possessed, the more people have invested in the current system, the more they resist change. They fear the loss of their position, money, authority, friendships, personal convenience, or other benefits that they value. The final cause of resistance is a person’s belief that the change is incompatible with the goals and best interests of the organizations. One of the most important resistant to change is fear of incompetence. Some people may fear they will not be able to handle the new job requirements. Therefore they manipulate the system for their own agenda. The morale in the organization becomes affected negatively and becomes fragile.…

    • 514 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    According to Robbins and Judge (2007), resistance to change is derived from two sources: individuality and organizational. Resistance resulting from an individual is due to the perceptions and personalities of people in the workplace. For example, change may cause insecurity in people and resistance because change threatens and alters their perception of job security (Robbins & Judge, 2007). Organizational resistance is linked to the formulation of the organizational structure. Structural inertia (e.g. formalized regulations) would be an example of an organizational source of resistance. These sources of resistance to organizational changes can be difficult to detect because of the way in which they present themselves. Robbins and Judge (2007) noted that, “resistance can be overt, implicit, immediate, or deferred” (p. 647).…

    • 1583 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays