Preview

Why Pakistan Should Not "Engage" with Israel

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2574 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Why Pakistan Should Not "Engage" with Israel
Recently the Foreign Ministers of Pakistan and Israel met in Istanbul, followed by a handshake between Pakistani President Pervez Musharraf and Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon, sparking speculations that Pakistan is going to accord recognition to Israel, a state whose existence Pakistan has denied up till now. This move triggered a nationwide debate - with some people in favor of the decision, arguing that Pakistan has no dispute with Israel and there are numerous benefits of recognizing the Jewish state, while others fiercely opposing the move. The Pakistani government 's stance is that the decision to "engage" with Israel was taken in appreciation of Israel 's recent withdrawal from the Gaza Strip, and that Pakistan 's contacts with Israel will enable it to exert pressure on Israel to resolve the Palestinian issue in a just manner.
This paper looks at whether the recent contacts and ultimately diplomatic ties with Israel are justified or not, keeping in mind the advantages and disadvantages of the decision. The purpose of this paper is to show that the reasons given by the Pakistani government for launching public contacts with Israel are not justified and establishing diplomatic relations with Israel until the creation of a viable Palestinian state, is morally wrong and not in the national interest of Pakistan.
First of all, let us look at the historical position of Pakistan on the Palestinian problem. Pakistan opposed the creation of Israel, and always defended the rights of the Palestinians as a matter of state policy. The founder of Pakistan had opposed the creation of Israel in these words. Every man and woman of the Muslim world will die before Jewry seizes Jerusalem. I hope the Jews will not succeed in their nefarious designs and I wish Britain and America should keep their hands off and then I will see how the Jews conquer Jerusalem. The Jews, over half a million, have already been accommodated in Jerusalem against the wishes of the people.



Cited: Avnery, Uri and Ha 'olam Hazeh. "The Commission and the Evidence." MERIP Reports, 115 (June 1983): 28-32+34. JSTOR. LUMS Lib. 15 Nov. 2005 "Evacuation Drama in Gaza." Dawn 16 Aug. 2005. "First Official Talks held with Israel: Stand on Palestine unchanged: Kasuri" Dawn 2 Sep. 2005. "Foreign relations of Israel." Wikipedia 15 Nov. 2005. Hamzeh, Muna and Todd May. Operation Defensive Shield: Witnesses to Israeli War Crimes. London: Pluto, 2003. Neff, Donald. "US Policy and the Palestinian Refugees." Journal of Palestine Studies, 18.1 (1988): 96-111. JSTOR. LUMS Lib. 14 Nov. 2005 "Pakistan 's Musharraf praises Sharon as courageous." Israel Insider 16 Nov. 2005. Siddiqui, Tayyab. "Gaza Pullout: an Eyewash?" Dawn 27 Sep. 2005.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    When you contextualize the issue, it’s evident that the Palestinians do have some validity to their grievances. One issue at hand is that the land Israel now occupies was once considered Palestine. The two civilizations used to coexist. It wasn’t until the mass influx of Jewish people following World War II when the battles over the region truly began. Following WWII, the Jewish Israeli settlers were given part of Palestine as a result of the persecutions to the people. It was done so by the United Nations on May 14th, 1948 in the following declaration. “By virtue of our national and intrinsic right and the strength of the resolution of the United Nations General Assembly, we hereby declare the establishment of a Jewish state in Palestine, which shall be known as the State of Israel” (Siegel). It was a reasonable solution--a two-state territory.…

    • 1180 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Palestinians who lived in Palestine before 1848 thought that they had rights over the entire country and not just half. The State of Israel was proclaimed on May 14 1948, but the Arab states rejected the partition of Palestine and the existence of Israel. In 1948 Palestinians were driven out of the new Israel into refugee camps in Jordan, Egypt, Lebanon and other regions.…

    • 1675 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Throughout the 20th Century relations between Arabs and Israelis in Palestine have undergone immense tension, change and deterioration, with both parties facing many barriers to peace. Foreign intervention is often listed as one such barrier to this peace. While the importance of foreign intervention cannot be omitted, other factors can be argued to have been both equally and more detrimental to the peace process. These include the founding of the Haganah, the 1948 War after the declaration of the State of Israel, and the rise of political extremism. The aim of this essay is to identify which barrier among so many was most significant in the hundred year period from 1900 to 2000.…

    • 1731 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Vatican foreign policy, like any other policy of international body, is subject to two variables. The first variable is that there is the overall political environment including both intra -church and external dimensions within which the Vatican which must respond to the Palestinian question. Then there is the personal element regarding the approaches that various popes from Pius X to John Paul II used to the handle the Palestinian question. This paper will explore the following questions and offer answers to them. What stance did Pope John Paul II take to the Palestinian-Israeli conflict prior to becoming pope in 1979? What stance did he take on the issue after he succeeded Pope John Paul I? And, finally what was his attitude in the latter stage of his papacy which ended with his death in April 2005?…

    • 4506 Words
    • 19 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Since 1915, the Middle East has been a place of significant world attention – specifically the land of Palestine, which has caused many conflicts between the Jews and the Arabs who both claimed it to be the land of their ancestors. Over the last century, foreign powers have become involved in the conflict and therefore played a significant role in the creation of the State of Israel in 1948. These foreign powers include Britain, France and the United States of America and the role they played in the creation of Israel varied in significance and impact.…

    • 1930 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    3. What is the most critical principle for non-Pakistanis to understand about how Pakistan views its neighbors? Why is this principle important to understand?…

    • 828 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Early on, the U.S. had developed a "well-organized pro-Israel constituency  thus becoming a major player in the creation as well as the keeping of the state of Israel. In the early 1940s President Franklin Roosevelt declared that "no decision altering the basic situation of Palestine should be reached without full consultation with both Arabs and Jews.  No matter how vague, this statement was the first of its kind that officially stated a policy and even a role in the conflict between the current Palestine and the future Israel. Later in 1947 during the Truman administration, the U.S. began the creation of Israel by helping to pass the partition resolution and then became the first country to recognize Israel as a legitimate state. One theory has been developed by Stork that the U.…

    • 990 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The 9/11 terror attack on the World Trade Centre in the United States ,put the issue of terrorism on the international radar, the perpetrators (Al Qaeda) of this never before seen method of violence put forward the issue of the continued occupation of Palestine by Israel as one of the motivating reasons for their action.(observer, 2011). The conflict between Israel and the Arabs for a sovereign entity for the Palestinians had led to regional wars in 1948, 1956, 1967 and 1973.These wars though fought in the Middle East had a ripple effect on global peace and security. The Arab nations involved in these wars were Egypt, Lebanon, Syria, Jordan, Iraq, and in all these military engagements the Arabs failed to militarily defeat Israel, and in each…

    • 137 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Palestine, or is it Israel? Either way, it is a highly contested land between two major Semitic groups: the Arabs, and the Hebrews. From the late 19th century, and throughout the 20th century it has been the focal point of Arab nationalism and Jewish Zionism. Today, it has become the Jewish state of Israel with occupied Palestinian Territories called the West Bank, which lies on the West side of the Jordan River, and the Gaza Strip, which borders Israel and Egypt. But, should the Palestinians deserve a state of their own? This essay will investigate the Palestinian side of the argument, their Biblical and Quranic ties to the land, the State of Palestine should have been created under Jordanian Egyptian as well as Israeli occupation of the land, and finally Israel’s poor relations with Palestine and colonial occupation of the land has led to the formation of many radical groups.…

    • 2176 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    was not one to be taken lightly, a lesson which would be forgotten and retaught…

    • 3272 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Palestine sits upon the Mediterranean Sea between Egypt, Syria, and Arabia; the land has switched hands many times over the past few thousands of years. Being a holy land for all three Abrahamic religions has led to a brutal conflict between them since their formation. The current conflict in Palestine has been raging for about three quarters of a century, but before it can be addressed some history must be known. For four centuries the land had been ruled by the Ottoman Empire, and as it began to collapse in the late 19th century ethnic Jews worldwide started a semi secular nationalist movement called Zionism which called for a return to their homeland of Israel which was promised to them by g-d in the Torah. In the First World War the Ottomans were on the losing side, and in 1917, with the Zionist movement growing, the United Kingdom’s Prime Minister Arthur Belfour declared that Britain backed the idea of establishing Palestine as a “national home for the Jewish people.”…

    • 2018 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Israel vs. Palestine

    • 906 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The reasoning for the Arabs' rightful ownership of and power over land in today's Israel, in a juxtapositional comparison, greatly debases the Jewish Israelites', though their argument for the push for a Jewish state is clear and understandable. Unfortunately, the Jewish people have been discriminated against by stronger and more powerful civilizations for millennia, never really catching a break; they have been slaves for the Egyptians, victims of genocide by Nazi Germany, marginalized throughout Europe, and persecuted by the Roman Empire, who crucified Jesus (Küng). Bringing this to so-called "justice" comes after World War II in 1948, but the story does not start there. Before and during World War I, a significant Jewish population inhabited the Ottoman empire, which encompassed the area from Greece, to today's Middle East, around the Mediterranean Sea, to northern Africa, more specifically in modern day Israel, coexisting, relatively peacefully, especially when compared to religious minorities…

    • 906 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Palestinian Nationalism

    • 1223 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In order to understand current Palestinian Nationalism (PN) there must be an understanding of the emergence of PN. It is a common belief that Zionism is the main factor for the emergence of PN. A faulty belief originated by ill-read commentators and misinformed TV programs. PN has its roots stemming from three different sources, British presence in the Middle East, the Arab National Movement, and finally the presence of Zionism. These sources are the tripartite factor for the emergence of Palestinian Nationalism. Within these three sources are three sentiments that helped shape the tripartite factor, hypocrisy, racism, and favoritism played by all parties. Current conditions in the region makes the understanding of PN crucial and the more analytical papers based on previous scholarly work will provide an opportunity for the ill-read to become well-read and watch with an analytical eye the misinformed TV programs especially when there are speeches insinuating cultural superiority.…

    • 1223 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Palestine Controversy

    • 681 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Although Palestine has a governing authority its “government” is not effectively controlling the West Bank or Gaza, which leads to an understanding that it is not ready to be its own state.…

    • 681 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Israel Position Paper

    • 763 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Since 1948 Israel-Palestine issue has been a problem for the international community. Israel was founded after the end of world war two. Ever since there have been problems for several reasons. When Israel was founded the Arab countries did not accept the sovereignty of the new country. Also the Palestinians were in disagree, because although there were over British control that was their land. That is why they should have their own sovereign state ruled by Palestinians.…

    • 763 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays