Preview

Who Is Margaret Atherton's Women Philosophers Of The Early Modern Period

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
418 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Who Is Margaret Atherton's Women Philosophers Of The Early Modern Period
Women Philosophers of the Early Modern Period is a book made by Margaret Atherton. The book is a basic assurance from the, all things considered; darken works of women researchers of the early present day time allotment. Among the most noticeable ones is a composed work that incorporates Descartes and Elisabeth. Using this book, the paper hopes to answer distinctive request. It will look at what Elisabeth is asking for that Descartes clear up, and what his response is. Also, the paper will evaluate Descartes answer to check whether it was adequate.
Firstly, we discuss what Elisabeth was asking for that Descartes clear up. Descartes begins speaking with Elisabeth, Princess Palatine of Bohemia, on sixth May 1643 when the last sent her first letter to the previous (Atherton, 1994). The correspondence begins after Elisabeth examines Descartes' Meditations and being befuddled about the association between the parts of the body and the psyche and all the more particularly the probability of their causal coordinated
…show more content…
After Elisabeth presses Descartes to make a light on the mind-body participation, he inevitably responds. Descartes' response is reluctant and in addition opens up further issues, His responses are twofold. Firstly, he battles that a reaction to this issue presupposes a clarification of the union between the brain and the body (Atherton, 1994). Also, he guarantees that the question itself come from a false presupposition that two substances with finish diverse natures can't follow up on each other (Atherton, 1994); and imply there is an inconsistency in considering brain and body as both two particular substances and as joined together (Mattern 1978). As demonstrated by Descartes' points of view, the psyche and the body are two unmistakable sorts of substances. The body is spatially expanded and unequipped for feeling or thought. The brain, of course, is unextended and fit for thought and

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    PSYCH 102 Chapter Outline

    • 10896 Words
    • 49 Pages

    René Descartes (1596–1650) was a dualist and proposed that mind and body interact at the pineal gland. He hypothesized that the cerebrospinal fluid of the brain’s cavities contained spirits which flowed from the brain through the nerves to the muscles, provoking movement.…

    • 10896 Words
    • 49 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Rene Descartes was a brilliant thinker, philosopher, scientist, physiologist, and early psychologist whose theory of mind-body connection has become an integral part of modern medicine (Goodwin, 2008). His dualist view, asserted the mind was ethereal and autonomous in relation to the physical and strictly material body, and to account for their interaction, he proposed the pineal gland was where the intersection of the two transpired (Goodwin, 2008). He theorized the mechanistic, reflexive nature of certain human behaviors, although his one caveat was that reasoning and thoughts were unique properties of the human soul (Wickens, 2005). Descartes 's work laid some of the fundamental parameters for modern thought in psychology, encouraged further research on the localization of brain function, and promoted further experimental research of the nervous system (Goodwin, 2008).…

    • 518 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Cartesian Dualism Flaws

    • 1061 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In Meditations on First Philosophy, René Descartes concludes that we are distinct from our body, and can exist without it. Seen from a modern materialist’s perspective, Descartes’ view is quite obviously wrong. However, assuming no knowledge of modern science, we should still be able to disprove his conclusion by looking for flaws in his reasoning in the text. In this essay, I will examine three relevant arguments Descartes presents in his sixth meditation and point out their flaws respectively.…

    • 1061 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In the backdrop of the dominant Cathothic doctrine that dictates how God ordained women to be physically and mentally inferior, a new wind of Enlightenment rationalist thought is emerging with Rene´ Descartes’ et al. In lieu of these developments de la Barre makes a bold claim: mental equality of the sexes. Autobiographical landmarks that Freedman (the editor of the book) discloses are how de la Barre became disenchanted with Catholicism while studying for the priesthood, then relocated to Geneva to convert to Calvinism, marry, and raise a family. Sharply criticized throughout his lifetime, de la Barre’s ideas were revived in the 20th century by biologist Simone de Beauvoir.…

    • 318 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Based upon the belief that the mind and body are two separate entities, philosophers, such as Rene Descartes, support the Substance Dualism theory of mind, arguing that the mind, which is a thinking entity, may exist without the body, which is a physical extension, because it is its own individual substance of matter. In Descartes’ Meditations on First Philosophy, he puts all concepts of previous certainty into question, intentionally leaving the reader with skepticism towards the concept of knowledge and mental capacity at large. Further, he continues to contend that the mind is distinctly different than the body and can be innovated due to its ability to think, whereas the body is merely a tangible and measureable dimension with no greater abilities, such as thinking or experiencing emotion. Additionally, Descartes further describes the ideas held by Substance Dualists through detailing that under this theory of mind, all entities are…

    • 616 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Separation of Mind and Body and the Modern Biological Perspective.17th-century philosopher René Descartes proposed a new idea: a difference between the spiritual mind and the physical body.…

    • 803 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Virginia Held is a modern day philosopher with theories on the feminist view in philosophy. All of the major philosophers have always written from the male perspective. As far back as the Bible, most major writings have always been geared towards men. They were considered the predominant species from the creation of Eve from Adam's rib. Many philosophers have described worlds that were based upon men, war, and reason. These theories were based on the experience of man. Women were too emotional and simple to understand the complexity of the world. Philosophers have always focused on man's influence and role in the world. These philosophers have downplayed or ignored the role of women in history. This paper will discuss the gender biased opinions of other philosophers as well as the importance of women in life. Virginia Held states that the history of philosophy has always been in favor of man. All theories have been based upon the male point of view. Philosophers' theories have been based on "assumptions and concepts that are by no means gender neutral". (Morality and Moral Controversies, pg. 89) Held's paper discusses the biased point of views displayed by many prominent philosophers. She has maintained that with the appearance of feminism and feminist ethics, major changes will have to be made in philosophy and theories. It is a fact that men and women have a different view on all things. This can be attributed to the fact that man and woman have different beliefs on what is important. This is not because women are unreasonable, but because of emotion. While women will try to do what is right, their theories of right and wrong are based upon the feelings that they have for the individual. A perfect example of this would be someone close to us was sick and needed medicine.…

    • 2200 Words
    • 63 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Descartes is, perhaps, the philosopher that most people reference when discussing the mind-body problem. For Descartes, there are two substances: Mind and Matter. Each substance has a defining attribute. In the case of Mind, the defining attribute is Thought. In the case of Matter, the defining attribute is spatial Extension. It is important to note that for Descartes, substances can have nothing in common, otherwise they would not be fundamentally different things. The mind-body problem arises out of this view of substances, because if mind and body have nothing in common, then in what way can they be said to interact? This is known as the problem of interaction.…

    • 891 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Mind-Body problem asks the question about the relationship between the mind and the body. We, as creatures have a brain, with several types of tissue and neurons and have we a mind because we have the ability to have emotions, sensations, beliefs and desires. The issue arises as we consider the brain as a physical object, but do we consider the mind as a physical entity too, and if the mind is a physical entity are our emotions, desires and sensations a product of our brain? Some argue that the mind is just like the brain and therefore it is a physical object. Some argue otherwise. Rene Descartes offered a solution for the Mind-Body problem, which he termed as Cartesian Dualism. According to Dualism, “brains and the bodies in which they are found are physical things; the mind, which is a non-physical…

    • 1184 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Substance Dualism

    • 1770 Words
    • 8 Pages

    In order to truly understand Descartes’ argument of substance dualism, it is important to understand the methodological, reductionist approach that he employs to build his theory. In the First Meditation, Descartes sets the basis for his ontological search for truth by rejecting all of his previous beliefs, experiences, and memories in order to begin from a clean, uninfluenced position. He says, “I have no senses. Body, shape, extension,…

    • 1770 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Descartes S Myth

    • 286 Words
    • 1 Page

    In “Descartes’s Myth,” Gilbert Ryle main conclusion is that the body and mind are two separate beings.…

    • 286 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Descartes, R, Murdoch, D. & Cottingham, J.The philosophical writings of Descartes, Volume 2. Reprint. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985.…

    • 1107 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In this particular section, appearing in the work’s fifth volume, we are introduced to Émile’s future wife Sophie, encapsulating Rousseau’s vision of the ideal woman, as Émile is his ideal man. Rousseau’s famous and infamous philosophy of female education sparked a huge contemporary response, provoking charges that it was both unjust and inconsistent with his own underlying principles, in particular, his insistence on the natural equality and independence of all human beings. Mary Wollstonecraft for example, who in her 1792 Vindication of the Rights of Women pressed for equality in education and legal rights, in order to give women a proper role and status dismissed Rousseau’s views on female education as ‘the reveries of fancy’ and a ‘refined licentiousness’ by which women are falsely made ‘the slave of love’. – For while the purpose of Sophie’s education, like Émile’s, is to perfect her nature, the perfection of her nature is to serve her husband– to develop her ‘natural essence’ of motherhood and dependence on man. He writes ‘the whole education of women ought to relate to men. To please men, to be useful to them, to make herself loved and honoured by them, to raise them when young, to care for them when…

    • 754 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    "I think, therefore I am"

    • 559 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Descartes felt that that the power of thinking or sensing has nothing to do with the physical body. If he could cease all thinking than he could cease to exist. A thing that thinks is "a thing that doubts, understands, affirms, denies, wills, refuses, and that also imagines and senses"(Descartes 20). There is a clear separation between the mind and the body. If the body exists, it does not mean the "I" exist. The mind is something that is thinking, indivisible, and non-extended while the body is something that is non-thinking, divisible and extended. He believes in the standard of perfection, which must be separate from his mind because of the imperfection in his thinking.…

    • 559 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Ecofeminism

    • 9417 Words
    • 38 Pages

    1. INTRODUCTION This dissertation examines some ecofeminist critiques of modern conceptions of nature. It focuses on the re-evaluation of the nature conception within western thought, following the emergence of science in the Enlightenment period. It looks at the analysis that some ecofeminist critics have elaborated in relation to the work of two of the “founding fathers” of modern science, Francis Bacon and Rene Descartes, to understand how they re-conceptualised nature and re-associated it with the new conception of women. The focus is on the Enlightenment era because the ideas, then constructed, brought about intellectual, political and economical revolutions that are now considered to be the foundations of our modern western society, economy, politics and beliefs. These have been constructed in a way that is so disengaged from nature that a fatal destruction of nature and a deterioration of social relations have been allowed. Whilst the analysis will be concentrated in the area of science and its epistemology of rationalism, it is recognised that they do not exist in a vacuum and are relevant and inter-connected to other topics, such as religion, economy, politics, etc.…

    • 9417 Words
    • 38 Pages
    Better Essays