http://www.gmanetwork.com/news/story/352186/news/nation/house-panel-oks-proposal-to-impose-death-penalty-vs-foreign-drug-traffickers Capital punishment in the Philippines has a varied history and, as of June 24 2006, is illegal. Capital punishment was first abolished in the Philippines in 1987 through changes to the Constitution; it was the first country in Asia to abolish capital punishment. It was reinstated in December 1993 through Republic Act No. 7659, which allowed capital punishment for "heinous crimes" following claims of a national crime spree. In 1999 the lethal injection was approved as the method of execution through Republic Act No. 8177. On March 24, 2000 President Joseph Estrada called for a moratorium on executions to honour the birth of Christ; executions were resumed a year later. Capital punishment was reabolished through Republic Act No. 9346, which was signed by President Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo on June 24, 2006. The bill followed a vote held in Congress earlier in the same month which overwhelmingly supported that the practice be abolished. The penalties of life imprisonment and reclusion perpetua (indeterminate sentence, 30-year minimum) replaced the death penalty. The sentences of the 1,230 death row inmates were commuted to life imprisonment in April, in what Amnesty International believes to be the "largest ever commutation of death sentences". Contents [hide]
2 See also
4 Original Source
Death Penalty: Moral and Judicial Debate under the Philippine Government 11/13/2012 8 Comments
In the long history of the Philippines, the death penalty was known and accepted fact. The code of Kalantiao, the oldest recorded body of laws of our early ancestors showed the strictness under the barangay that existed and based their moral acceptance of right and wrong. For example, anyone caught stealing would be penalized by suffering the loss of finger.
The graver the theft, the more fingers were cut and if the theft was very grave, the hands was chopped off, therefore it is understandable that even in the Early periods of our history there are certain punishment for a offense, that even the code of Kalantiao imposed death penalty for rape and murder that is considered as heinous crime.
Today, the State itself has different punishment opposite to its offence, our legislators implement and pass a Bill that will sentenced a grave offender of crime, one of it is the Republic Act No. 7659 or the Death Penalty Act which gathers many controversies on its implementation, according to this act a criminal who has been proven guilty to a heinous crime with the proper due process of law will be executed. “An eye for an eye” does not mean vengeance, for the Almighty God himself said, vengeance is mine and by this he meant he would met justice in accordance with his mysterious way through the Ten Commandments from which morals laws were taken. Precisely no one has the right to deprive another person of his life, degrade him or her to the status of an animal, or abuse and debase a person to the extent of destroying forever his or her dignity. But how about the victims? Those who were murdered and raped, those children who were abduct for ramson and then killed, for those school kids and teenagers who buys drugs and in the process slowly or make them criminals, rapist and murderers while the pushers enrich themselves.
The death penalty itself on the other hand could strike fear in the minds of those criminals and make them think twice before committing any act of violence. That the Capital punishment may act as an instrument with which the righteous may be guarded against the offender. The enforcement of Capital Punishment under proper circumstances places a high value on human life and upholds dignity of man, than making him stop to the level of criminals by lashing out at them with similar brutality in...
References: REPUBLIC ACT NO. 7659
AN ACT TO IMPOSE THE DEATH PENALTY ON CERTAIN HEINOUS CRIMES, AMENDING FOR THAT PURPOSE THE REVISED PENAL LAWS, AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES
Please join StudyMode to read the full document