The issue with this case is that does it violate the Fourteenth Amendment. Which in short says that no other state has the…
The issue at hand here concerned two points. The first one is whether or not the US Attorney General John D. Ashcroft has violated the four amendment prohibition the arrest of any individual without just cause ( the right of the people to be secure in their persons). The second point concerned a probable immunity against lawsuit, granted by law, for all government officials in the exercise of the…
They brought it to the Supreme court to see if Lopez should be convicted because he brought the gun to school. The issue contains the being stronger and better than everything else clause from Article VI named…
a. The justices essentially claimed for themselves the right to override the decisions of state courts.…
Next came the Court of Appeals which was the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The United States Courts for the Ninth Circuit consists of the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals along with district and bankruptcy courts in the 15 federal judicial districts that comprise the circuit, and associated administrative units that provide various court services.The Ninth Circuit’s decision did not reflect the “simple truth that Alaska is often the exception, not the rule” and would “prevent the Park Service from recognizing Alaska’s unique conditions.” Lastly came the Supreme Court case which was the Roberts Court (2016) finalizing this case. The relevant precedents that went along with this case were Katie John v. United States, Assocs, Totemoff v. State- Mike Totemoff shot a deer on federal land killing it on the spot, illegal and against ANILCA., United States v. California- Offshore boundary that people cannot fish due to low minerals, and other natural…
Chen, Alan K. "THE BURDENS OF QUALIFIED IMMUNITY: SUMMARYJUDGMENT AND THE ROLE OF FACTS IN CONSTITUTIONAL TORT LAW." Web. 16 Jan. 2017.…
In the end, it is clear that Taney’s majority opinion should and most likely did strike fear into the hearts of states rights supporters. The Supreme Court’s…
no state may "deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws."…
In this portion of the case, we are focused on the reasons for the United States District Court's decision to deny the emergency motion for a stay brought by the United States government. The motion in question was in response to the enforcement of a temporary restraining order (TRO) filed together by Washington and Minnesota; or collectively, "the States".…
1. Describe the legal reasoning of the ECJ for the creation of the state liability doctrine. Do you agree with this reasoning?…
This self-defense law currently has 22 states that agree with what it stands for. States such as Washington, Montana, Pennsylvania and Kansas are among these that have adopted and inforce this law. Self-defense is critical to our survival in the world today. Many people have to defend themselves on a daily basis, depending on the area in which they live. I think this law is necessary for those who, on a daily basis, are threatened by violence. An example of this law in action is the Whipple vs Edwards case in North Charleston, South Carolina. In this case, Stand Your Ground was used for A’Kara Travil Kymberle Edwards who was “arrested in connection to the fatal stabbing of her boyfriend last summer has been granted immunity from prosecution” (Murder Suspect…). In this case,…
One aspect to this case would be that it was the first one in history to use “judicial review.” This allowed courts to void acts from Congress that they deemed unconstitutional.…
"Florida v. Jardines." Oyez itt chicago-kent college of law. N.p., n.d. Web. 23 Mar. 2017.…
“The district courts shall have original jurisdiction of all civil actions arising under the Constitution, laws, or treaties of the United States.”…
The U.S. legal system is considered a developed one that consists of many levels of statutes, amendments, and precedence. Simple reference to the Constitution cannot provide complete justification for the existence of a rule. Instead, one must take into account the rule’s relation to the Constitution, previous interpretations of related rules, and the possible conflict this rule may have with the previous rules. Observation of these relations is…