Case Brief Saenz V. Roe (1999)
Case Brief Saenz v Roe (1999)
1. Facts
The facts of the Saenz V Roe case is that in 1992 the state of California wanted to change the Aid to Families with Dependent Children Program by setting a limit to new residents. By having this approved by the Secretary of Health and Human Services and having the Federal District Court implement it, there would a large number of new residents who would be treated unequally. By the time it became into law on April 1, 1997 a class action was filed to challenge it. Then Ms. Brenda Roe brought it up along with other first year residents to Rita Saenz in the Supreme Court.
2. Issues
The issue with this case is that does it violate the Fourteenth Amendment. Which in short says that no other state has the
1. Facts
The facts of the Saenz V Roe case is that in 1992 the state of California wanted to change the Aid to Families with Dependent Children Program by setting a limit to new residents. By having this approved by the Secretary of Health and Human Services and having the Federal District Court implement it, there would a large number of new residents who would be treated unequally. By the time it became into law on April 1, 1997 a class action was filed to challenge it. Then Ms. Brenda Roe brought it up along with other first year residents to Rita Saenz in the Supreme Court.
2. Issues
The issue with this case is that does it violate the Fourteenth Amendment. Which in short says that no other state has the