Preview

what account who was a more successful dictator: hitler or stalin

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2915 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
what account who was a more successful dictator: hitler or stalin
Since the twentieth century, there have been a lot of comparisons between Adolf Hitler and Joseph Stalin. Notably, both of these dictators are known for their pitiless behaviour. As a result of an unparalleled level of authoritarianism, propaganda and endeavours to manipulate the citizens, these two dictators both possessed outright power. Each of these tyrants was compelled by innovative, debatable and exploitative ideologies about the supposed structure of the society and the world power. While Hitler and Stalin share some clear similarities, their personalities, the efficacy of governance and certain regimes were justifiably different. This essay with the use of dominant quantifiers of power such as style of leadership, propaganda, and the establishment of fundamental economic policies will argue that Hitler’s agenda was more successful. Stalin might have accomplished instilling a higher level of terror on the citizens; but it was also the cause of his inability to retain an efficient method of ruling. Finally, it would be concluded by linking a concrete analysis of Hitler’s dictatorship with scholars of World History to prove the main argument that Hitler’s embodied a more proficient and productive dictator rather than Stalin. It is necessary to note that this essay is not in its entirety stating that Hitler was infallible or a botch, but only assessing Hitler based on the different aspects of a successful leadership he implemented, during his supremacy in the Third Reich which led to the conclusion of him being a more successful dictator when compared to Stalin and his achievements.

Noticeably, certain schools of thoughts such as the structuralist school have made attempts to make aware their claims and view towards Hitler’s dictatorship capabilities. Activists of the structuralist school such as Martin Broszat and Hans Mommsen have mainly paid attention on interpreting the systemization of German by the Nazis and the leadership capabilities of Hitler

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Hitler and Stalin are names that will be forever remember as evil master minds of killing millions of people in order to create a perfect race. In this paper, there will be a comparison of Hitler and Stalin’s careers. Also, investigating which one had a greater impact on the twentieth century.…

    • 485 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hitler has been categorised as a weak and a strong dictator by structuralist and intentionalist historians respectively, intentionalist for the importance of Hitler, and structuralist for the importance of those around him. Timothy Mason, a British Marxist historian, is an example of a structuralist historian, believing that Hitler was heavily reliant on those around and supporting him. There is also Ian Kershaw, who believed in the ‘Working towards the Fuhrer’ ideology, where Hitler exploited the attitudes of the German people in an attempt to have them work towards him.…

    • 851 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There are many factors that contribute to Hitler’s rise to power from his personality to the Wall Street Crash. They are all important factors that helped him win the elections and become Chancellor in January 1933. The point of this essay is to describe how Hitler’s personality, the Wall Street Crash, the Political Crisis, the Nazi’s being Anti-Communist, the promise to reverse the Treaty of Versailles, the promise to tackle unemployment, women being attracted to the Nazi party and the Anti-Jewish campaign all contributed to Hitler’s rise to power. Personally I think that the most important factor is the Wall Street Crash because Germany was then forced to vote for the Nazi’s because they had nothing better to hope for.…

    • 1439 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hitler commands the Germans to invade the Soviet Union in 1941 – this was Hitler’s greatest mistake, but was luck on the Soviets side or was it all just the leader Stalin’s good tactics and leadership? Even though Stalin was a mass murderer and a ruthless leader, he did one thing right. After the Soviets were losing battle after battle Stalin let his commanders fight the war as they knew it, did not interfere with their plan and stuck to his word, unlike Hitler did. Stalin let his commanders be true commanders and did not use them as puppets or for his own use. He was a true leader stuck to his word which is why I think the he was successful at leading his nation to victory. As the war continued the number of errors that Stalin was making got…

    • 379 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Throughout history dictators have arisen from all over. Josef Stalin and Benito Mussolini are two of the most significant dictators in history. Both of them tried to establish a totalitarian government but had many similarities and differences in obtaining that goal. Totalitarianism is when the government holds complete control of the citizens and industries.…

    • 402 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Hitler. Stalin. Mussolini. These three names define World War II. World policy revolved around them for at least a decade or in Stalin 's case for almost fifty years. Much is generally known about each man 's role in the war, but only as it pertains to the outcome. Not many people possess extensive knowledge of these dictators as individuals or as leaders of a particular party. This paper will attempt to shed light on the differences as well as the similarities of they style of totalitarianism that the three men who shaped the middle of the twentieth century implemented in their respective countries.…

    • 3072 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hitler Vs. Stalin

    • 312 Words
    • 2 Pages

    During the time of World War II period in the 1900s, two rulers from two great nations rose to power. They are Hitler from the Nazi Germany and Stalin from the Soviet Union. Both of the two leaders share some similarities in their rule, for example they had total control of their countries. However, there are few differences between them as well. By examining the historical events, we can see that how Hitler and Stalin led Germany and Soviet Union to the top of world stage.…

    • 312 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Stalin and Purges

    • 1516 Words
    • 7 Pages

    [15] Todd Allan. The European Dictatorships: Hitler, Stalin, Mussolini. (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2002). Pp 89.…

    • 1516 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Looking back at the events that occurred during our history, particularly during World War II, many of the people often reflect back and ask the question, ‘Who let a man like Hitler come into power or what made the German people decide to follow him? The seeds of Hitler's rise to power were planted following the outcome of the First World War. Hitler’s rise to power was not inevitable. It depended heavily on a range of factors, events and circumstances.…

    • 1568 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    “1984" vs. Nazi Germany

    • 529 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Now, it is a known fact that Adolf Hitler was one of the 20th century’s most powerful dictators. He was responsible for World War II and the death of millions. Hitler saw a nation in despair and used this as an…

    • 529 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Broszat broke away from a personality based, Hitler-centred treatment of Nazism to explore the causal connections between the development of the internal power – structure and the progressive radicalization of the Nazi regime24. Being particularly concerned about the historicism of the Third Reich, it being seen as an aberration, and therefore wanted to look more widely at the structures other than Hitler. This being achieved by looking at a wider range of sources, such as the research undertaken and published between the mid-1970s and early 1980s with the framework of the ‘Bavaria Project', which led to an ‘Alltagsgeschichte' which helped to offer an entirely new dimension to the understanding of the relationship between the state and society in Nazi Germany25. In Broszat's viewpoint, such Hitler-centred treatment of Nazism is a major obstacle in historians approaching the scholarly study and analysis of Nazism in the same way that other periods of history are tackled and that until there is a proper integration of Nazism into ‘normal historical writing, the Third Reich would remain an ‘island' in modern German…

    • 851 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In this report the profile of Hitler and Mussolini were presented and compared. Charismatic, Transformational, Narcissistic and Visionary styles of leadership were briefly introduced. As a result, an analysis of Hitler’s or Mussolini’s traits assigning them to any of these styles has been possible. The comparison of their activity as leaders has been carried out. In the conclusion of this report, the final verdict over their suitability as leaders has been included.…

    • 2272 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Wendell Willkie, the Republican Presidential candidate in 1940, once said, “It is from weakness that people reach for dictators and concentrated government power.” In Germany, Italy, and Japan, the awful economic, political, and racial conditions leading up to World War II gave rise to three of the modern world’s fiercest dictators. Adolf Hitler, Benito Mussolini, and Hideki Tojo have gone down in history for all the wrong reasons, and they will forever be remembered for the dark stain they have left on history. Adolf Hitler, possibly the most infamous of dictators, is one of the most known figures in history. Before Hitler came to power, Germany was in the midst of an economic depression, still trying to find money to pay its war reparations after losing World War I (Hitler, 1).…

    • 668 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The end result was a combination of the resurgence of authoritarian rule coupled with a new type of cruel and active tyranny which reached its peak in Nazi Germany and the Stalinist Soviet Union. It was Hitler’s aggression toward Poland that triggered World War II. The horrors of this time period are a disturbing chapter in history, which many would like to believe were an aberration and will not happen again. One would do well to learn the lessons of history, lest they be repeated in our own day. Such authoritarian governments did not have modern technology or means of communication, and as a result did not have the capacity to control many aspects of the lives of their citizens; however they apparently had no desire to do so, as they were preoccupied with their own survival.…

    • 1192 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Rise of Adolf Hitler

    • 606 Words
    • 2 Pages

    After the failure of the putsch on November 9, 1923 and his “one year” imprisonment, Adolf Hitler realized that he needed to change his approach in order to seize the power he desired. In order to overthrow the government, Hitler needed to use democracy. After the stock market crash in 1929, the notion of Hitler becoming the leader became more tempting for the Germans. Using the tragic state of the economy to rise to power, Hitler managed to become Chancellor in 1933. This essay will discuss why Hitler was able seize so much power by inspecting the Treaty of Versailles, his political abilities and use of propaganda, and the stock market crash.…

    • 606 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays