Preview

what account who was a more successful dictator: hitler or stalin

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2915 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
what account who was a more successful dictator: hitler or stalin
Since the twentieth century, there have been a lot of comparisons between Adolf Hitler and Joseph Stalin. Notably, both of these dictators are known for their pitiless behaviour. As a result of an unparalleled level of authoritarianism, propaganda and endeavours to manipulate the citizens, these two dictators both possessed outright power. Each of these tyrants was compelled by innovative, debatable and exploitative ideologies about the supposed structure of the society and the world power. While Hitler and Stalin share some clear similarities, their personalities, the efficacy of governance and certain regimes were justifiably different. This essay with the use of dominant quantifiers of power such as style of leadership, propaganda, and the establishment of fundamental economic policies will argue that Hitler’s agenda was more successful. Stalin might have accomplished instilling a higher level of terror on the citizens; but it was also the cause of his inability to retain an efficient method of ruling. Finally, it would be concluded by linking a concrete analysis of Hitler’s dictatorship with scholars of World History to prove the main argument that Hitler’s embodied a more proficient and productive dictator rather than Stalin. It is necessary to note that this essay is not in its entirety stating that Hitler was infallible or a botch, but only assessing Hitler based on the different aspects of a successful leadership he implemented, during his supremacy in the Third Reich which led to the conclusion of him being a more successful dictator when compared to Stalin and his achievements.

Noticeably, certain schools of thoughts such as the structuralist school have made attempts to make aware their claims and view towards Hitler’s dictatorship capabilities. Activists of the structuralist school such as Martin Broszat and Hans Mommsen have mainly paid attention on interpreting the systemization of German by the Nazis and the leadership capabilities of Hitler

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Hitler Vs. Stalin

    • 312 Words
    • 2 Pages

    During the time of World War II period in the 1900s, two rulers from two great nations rose to power. They are Hitler from the Nazi Germany and Stalin from the Soviet Union. Both of the two leaders share some similarities in their rule, for example they had total control of their countries. However, there are few differences between them as well. By examining the historical events, we can see that how Hitler and Stalin led Germany and Soviet Union to the top of world stage.…

    • 312 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Looking back at the events that occurred during our history, particularly during World War II, many of the people often reflect back and ask the question, ‘Who let a man like Hitler come into power or what made the German people decide to follow him? The seeds of Hitler's rise to power were planted following the outcome of the First World War. Hitler’s rise to power was not inevitable. It depended heavily on a range of factors, events and circumstances.…

    • 1568 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Rise of Adolf Hitler

    • 606 Words
    • 2 Pages

    After the failure of the putsch on November 9, 1923 and his “one year” imprisonment, Adolf Hitler realized that he needed to change his approach in order to seize the power he desired. In order to overthrow the government, Hitler needed to use democracy. After the stock market crash in 1929, the notion of Hitler becoming the leader became more tempting for the Germans. Using the tragic state of the economy to rise to power, Hitler managed to become Chancellor in 1933. This essay will discuss why Hitler was able seize so much power by inspecting the Treaty of Versailles, his political abilities and use of propaganda, and the stock market crash.…

    • 606 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “1984" vs. Nazi Germany

    • 529 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Now, it is a known fact that Adolf Hitler was one of the 20th century’s most powerful dictators. He was responsible for World War II and the death of millions. Hitler saw a nation in despair and used this as an…

    • 529 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In this report the profile of Hitler and Mussolini were presented and compared. Charismatic, Transformational, Narcissistic and Visionary styles of leadership were briefly introduced. As a result, an analysis of Hitler’s or Mussolini’s traits assigning them to any of these styles has been possible. The comparison of their activity as leaders has been carried out. In the conclusion of this report, the final verdict over their suitability as leaders has been included.…

    • 2272 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Throughout history dictators have arisen from all over. Josef Stalin and Benito Mussolini are two of the most significant dictators in history. Both of them tried to establish a totalitarian government but had many similarities and differences in obtaining that goal. Totalitarianism is when the government holds complete control of the citizens and industries.…

    • 402 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Adolph Hitler became Chancellor of Germany in January 1933 and his power depended upon propaganda for the Nazi's and terror. This essay will attempt to show how the Nazis used fear and propaganda to sustain power during the 1930s.…

    • 730 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The instalment of Adolf Hitler as Chancellor, the ever continuing rise of Nazism and the final fall of the Weimar Republic. Events of 1933 in Germany through which the birth of the Third Reich was to begin, National Socialism implemented through Gleichschaltung and Hitler’s Weltanschauung would be a reality. A pivotal year indeed, through which The Nazi Party was able to legally gain control of government and wipe away all traces of the Weimar Republic, a move based not only on political promise but also on securing the base of Hitler’s new Germany from the ailments that affected the Weimar Republic. A system that Hitler not only despised but understood to be fundamentally weak. While Hitler was only one of many enemies and adversaries of the Republic, Hitler’s success was by no means based solely on either the faults of the Republic or on the prowess of his Nazi Party to overcome other competing forces for German government. It shall also be stated that though all the faults within the Weimar Republic were not directly an advantage to the Nazi Party, they still lead to an overall situation in which any problems the Weimar faced, the Nazis could view as an advantage. Herewith it will be shown that Hitler’s image and the belief in Nazi action which rallied many Germans to his Party over others in the final years of Weimar, highlighted an important fact. That is, the rise of the Nazi’s relied on the circumstances that it could exploit and the ability of the leaders to succeed in furthering their gains from these failings which ailed the Republic politically, socially and economically.…

    • 2486 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Was Hitler a Weak Dictator?

    • 4126 Words
    • 17 Pages

    The ‘structuralist' school of thought (sometimes called the ‘functionalist' school) includes historians such as Tim Mason, Hans Mommsen and Martin Broszat. Though structuralists do not deny the importance of Hitler's role, they tend to stress the fact that he exercised his power within certain structures that shaped, and in some ways placed limits upon, his policies. Some structuralists also argue that Hitler was indecisive, influenced by his cronies, and divorced from the day-to-day running of the Third Reich. Hans Mommsen even goes so far as to argue that Hitler was in some ways a ‘weak dictator'.…

    • 4126 Words
    • 17 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    After World War One German had to face serious problems, such as the Treaty of Versailles, dislike of the weak and unpopular Weimar Government, serious economic problems of inflation and unemployment in the early 1920s and again after 1929 and the Great Depression. Furthermore, fear and concern about the rise of communism with strikes and rebellions. Hitler used powerful persuasion techniques such as propaganda and in other circumstance aggression and violence to eliminate his opponents, thus aiding him to become a totalitarian dictator. This essay will discus the Treaty of Versailles, dislike of the government and economic problems and also fear of communism and the techniques Hitler used to gain power.…

    • 2019 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Nazi Germany Totalitarian

    • 3001 Words
    • 13 Pages

    From Hitler's election to power in January 1933, Nazi Germany although exhibiting totalitarian elements lacked some required factors to characterize it fully as a totalitarian state. George Orwell suggested that totalitarianism is (1984, introduction) "the ability for a political system or society where the individual does not exist, a single party controls every aspect of life." Paramount to the classification of a state as totalitarian is the oppression of its people and the lack of their patriotism caused by the resentment and anger they harbor towards their dictator. Rather it was through populism gained through continued success that Hitler governed Germany. A question is raised as to the extent that the Nazi government conformed to a totalitarian state and an example of this dispute arises with the structuralists criticism of the interpretation of the intentionalists. Structuralists, notably Ian Kershaw, criticize the internationalists emphasis on the form the society took rather than its content. Intentionalists, such as Alan Bullock, focus on the image presented by the Nazis. With respect to both these arguments it would be further incorrect to describe Nazi Germany as fully totalitarian as it does not fulfill sufficient criteria according to the academic interpretation of Carl Friederich. Thus Nazi Germany cannot be labeled a totalitarian state in the period 1933-1942.…

    • 3001 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hans Mommsen’s book, From Weimar to Auschwitz, presented an interesting look at Hitler within the Nazi Party. The overriding themes in the chapter “Hitler’s Position in the Nazi System” were the stubbornness and charisma of Hitler and the chaos within the Nazi Party. The weak leadership of Hitler along with the inability to concentrate power to one position helped lead the Third Reich to be a very frenzied and unorganized government.…

    • 710 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Adolf Hitler, regardless of his wrong doings and the obvious evil that he empowered, was one of the great leaders of our time and changed the way that our society looked at war. The fact that Hitler came from a front-line soldier with no real future in a leadership role to the chancellor of Germany and the commander of a great army shows his great will and ability to meet his goals and to manipulate people to achieve a vision. The reason that I chose Hitler as the subject for this paper was because of the great impact that he had on our world over the last century and also to take a look at just how he could convince not only his nation but other allies to carry out his ill-will towards Russia and the Jews. Whether or not he is viewed as crazy is irrelevant here, his leadership and manipulative skills allowed him to achieve at least some of his sub-goals and very nearly his overall goal of expanding Germany into Russia and exterminating the Jews. When looking at a leadership style or a model to compare Hitler to, there is one word that really stands out in most leadership models that all relate to Hitler: directive. This paper will look at two different models which I believe will show what kind of leader Hitler was and also why I think that he was as successful as he possibly could have been. These two models are Blake and Mouton's Leadership Grid and the contingency model. On Blake and Mouton's Leadership Grid, Hitler should be taken as a "9,1" type leader, the place on the model known as "authority-compliance". This type of leader is said to place heavy emphasis on task and job requirements and only care about people because they are "tools" necessary in getting the job done. The leader is often seen as controlling, demanding, hard-driving, and overpowering (Northouse, 2004: pg 69). The contingency theory looks at not only the leader but the subordinates and then predicts whether or not the leader should be effective in his…

    • 2798 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The rise in power of Hitler in January 30, 1933 did not come through a revolutionary way, but through lies and manipulations that eventually secured Hitler his election in a political office. Having already attempted to take over the German government by force in November 1923, Hitler had failed and was, now, fully determined that the Nazis will gain control of the German state only in a “legal” manner (Spielvogel, pp. 59).…

    • 761 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mussolini and Hitler both came to power during the interwar years. Both were fascist Dictators who did not only share similar aspects of ideology but also in the way they accumulated power. This essay will examine the conditions in which both dictators were allowed to emerge and grow and will also consider the differences in particular methods and manipulations used by the two leaders and their parties to obtain power.…

    • 971 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays