Preview

Westboro Baptist Church

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
779 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Westboro Baptist Church
Persuasive opinion paper
God hates fags, Thank god for dead soldiers, Thank god for Hurricane Katrina, Pretty harsh right? These are all common phrases publically protested by a church called the Westboro Baptist church. You would think such comments should be illegal to chant out in public considering that gay marriage is now legal in some states and also that soldiers are out fighting for us, however members of the Westboro Baptist church feel differently. Westboro Baptist church was established in 1955. Located in Topeka, Kansas, Their goal is to “preach the Word of God to this crooked and perverse generation”. They take on such goals by publically protesting these horrendous phrases on street corners, gay festivals, and more shockingly the funerals of dead soldiers. Sounds illegal and disrespectful however according to the first amendment, which is freedom of speech, they are within the words of the law. I am personally against the actions of the Westboro Baptist church. In my opinion it is downright disrespectful and should not be allowed. However in a legal aspect such protesting and picketing are done carefully within the law. According to the The Respect for America’s Fallen Heroes Act, you must stand at least 500 feet away, which is exactly what they do. Shouting phrases and holding up signs that would make anyone’s jaw drop, they have no shame. Soldiers risk their lives for us each and every day so we can enjoy the freedom we have and also to make sure we are safe. The argument that the Westboro Baptist church members are using their right to freedom of speech is almost ironic because had it not been for the courageous acts of our soldiers, they would not be granted the ability to publically protest they do. They are taking advantage of a right that would not be in place if it weren’t for the fighting of our soldiers. They should be awarding them not protesting at their funerals. They believe god loves dead soldiers because soldiers are out

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Westboro Baptist Church members led by Fred Phelps believe that God hates the United States and punishes its citizens for its acceptance of homosexuality. To express their beliefs, the church members picket military and other funerals. Phelps’ group pickets by carrying signs and singing songs while standing on public property. Other groups have been formed to protest Phelps’ group. The church claims their speech is protected by the First Amendment Freedom of Speech Clause in the United States Constitution. I agree that the church has this right as does the group protesting Phelp’s group, and neither is violating the constitutional rights of others, even though I believe the actions of Westboro Baptist Church are appalling and depraved.…

    • 565 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Phelps places before us a choice where we must decide between the ethical values of basic respect versus the legal right of the First Amendment, freedom of speech. From an ethical perspective, it is easy to decide this case based upon the ideas that we adopted over time that all in all became a social norm. The ethical value of respect at a funeral will easily make someone choose the side of Snyder’s in this case just because over time we have established that funerals are meant to mourn and to pay respect to not only the fallen but also the family of that person. Although it may be interpreted that the reason that the Westboro Church chose to take action the way that they did was because it was necessary to get their point across, ethically it is frowned upon because of how we know funerals are supposed to take place. The Westboro Church had many options to establish the point that they were trying to get across such as the newspaper, TV, or the radio, but instead they chose to do it at a US Marine’s funeral which ended up working in their favor gaining them national recognition. Potter Stewart, a once US Justice wrote with regards to Ethics that, “Ethics is knowing the difference between what you have a right to do and what is right to do." This quote explains the complete ethical aspect of this case because it describes how legally, the Westboro Church had every right to do what they did that day but ethically they were in the wrong intruding on the…

    • 1754 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Westboro Baptist Church

    • 406 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Westboro Baptist Church was founded in 1955 by Fred Phelps. During his youth he attended various Universities and Colleges. He said that he attended a Methodist revival and that was what sparked his fire in religion. Afterwards he decided to become a minister; he changed his denomination affiliation to Baptist and was ordained as a minister. His two sons insist that church is a carefully planned cult that allows its leader to make himself seem like a demigod.…

    • 406 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Best Essays

    Not The Final CHHII 665

    • 4222 Words
    • 14 Pages

    “Religious Liberty” is a good and perfect gift.1 Contrary to populace belief, the expression “separation of church and state” did not originate with the ACLU but with the British Baptists. The honorable hunger for “religious liberty” was a God-given desire that led them to America.2 They arrived in America and carried religious freedom cupped with the horrors associated with coercive religious. They envision a country in which Christians, of different persuasion, could live in brotherly love and shared society and civil affairs. The British Baptists were true defenders of “religious liberty,” for all men, i.e., Turkish, Jewish, Buddist or any other religion.3 Their goal was not merely tolerance but only aimed at absolute, “religious liberty.”4…

    • 4222 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    It is an insensitive act; although it is their right to do so. According to the Supreme Court’s ruling, the displaying of these symbols is protected under the First Amendment.…

    • 587 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Salem Rhetorical Analysis

    • 940 Words
    • 4 Pages

    As quoted from Roosevelt, there is “...freedom of every person to worship God in his own way.” I was criticized heavily for inconsistently attending church and not baptizing my youngest child. However, it is my husband’s and my own decision as to how we choose to worship. We have our own personal preference of how we wish to show our religious observance. As a community, we should be “working together in a friendly, civilized society”, not ridiculing each other over decisions that are personal to each and every individual. There should be no pressure for a person to dedicate himself to a practice that he does not wish to participate in. However, here in Salem, my husband and I were said to be unfaithful and shameful, when we simply disagreed with the preaching that was occurring at that time, surely no reason for us to be interrogated and outcasts. Our town lacks desperately needed tolerance and acceptance, or we will never find peace with one…

    • 940 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Snyder V Phelps

    • 606 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Westboro church’s actions all stemmed from Phelps and the church’s belief that God is punishing the United States for allowing homosexuals into the military, although Lance Corporal Snyder was not homosexual, in fact, Phelps claims he was not targeting the family of the deceased but instead was targeting the U.S. Military, only using Snyder’s funeral as a forum for their protest.…

    • 606 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Nationalist Socialist Party of America (American Nazi Party) had a right to march in the street in Skokie, Illinois in 1977 because the First Amendment protects their right to free speech, free press, and peaceably to assemble. The Nazis, like all citizens, are entitled to their political beliefs, even if those beliefs are sending hate messages, as long as there is not a clear and present danger, they can vocalize those beliefs. There was no clear and present danger because the Nazis had no plans to harm any citizen of Skokie, even if their message was one of hate towards those of Jewish faith. The printed materials that were being dispersed did have messages of hate but as long as there were no actions of hate, they were still protected. People that would say they do not have a right would claim that these printed materials are the threat that would be unconstitutional, and although most Americans would disagree with these beliefs, the right of the Nazis to feel this way is warranted under the constitution. The Nazis are entitled to their religious beliefs and practices, and although we do not typically look at the Nazis as a religious party, they are anti-semantic, which is itself a belief towards a religious group.…

    • 929 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Your Last Sodomy (WBC)

    • 114 Words
    • 1 Page

    Since 1955, WBC has taken forth the precious from the vile, and so is as the mouth of God (Jer. 15:19). In 1991, WBC began conducting peaceful demonstrations opposing the fag lifestyle of soul-damning, nation-destroying filth.…

    • 114 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    People should have freedom to say what they want to say, for what they believe in.…

    • 264 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    (ACLU) Their website states that "We do not defend them because we agree with them; rather, we defend their right to free expression and free assembly." (ACLU) The ACLU then goes on to say that "Historically, the people whose opinions are the most controversial or extreme are the people whose rights are most often threatened." (ACLU) The ACLU finishes off their explanation of choosing to defend such organizations by saying that "Once the government has the power to violate one person's rights, it can use that power against everyone."…

    • 1200 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    People are entitled to one of the rights listed in the first amendment, the freedom of speech. It’s true that some people are hateful but even if we don’t like, agree, or even joke about it we don’t have the right to control them. People are unable to express their thoughts and feelings because they do not want to offend others.…

    • 107 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Some people believe the words should be removed for two reasons. The first reason is that the words are unconstitutional. The second reason is that including the words forces certain religious views upon a captive audience. While it seems that the words violate the Constitution, and they appear to force particular tenets onto everyone, in truth the words do not coerce particular religious views, and the words are a part of American culture.…

    • 960 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    These selfless acts of sacrifice enabled America to earn our independence and have allowed us the freedoms that our inalienable rights allow: life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. Today, we are free to pursue an education, religion, careers, housing, we have freedom of speech, and the right to bear arms. These are just a few of the freedoms that we have because of our veterans - freedoms that people in other countries are denied. As Judd Greg, former governor of New Hampshire, pointed out during a ceremony at Graceland Cemetery in December of 2013, “The veterans of our military services have put their lives on the line to protect the freedoms that we enjoy” (journalexpress.net…

    • 639 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The First Amendment states that “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion or prohibiting the free exercise thereof or abridging the freedom of speech or of the press or the right of the people peaceably to assemble and petition the government for a redress of grievances.”(Beattie-Moss) Many people use this…

    • 620 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics