Question 5:
What is it about theories in the human sciences and natural sciences that makes them convincing?
- Humans in general are gullible. “One who does not know anything must believe everything.” Since nobody knows everything, with a bit of evidences, which scientific experiments bring along people believe what they are confronted with. Only when you are intelligent enough to question the authority of the scientist that did the experiment are you able to disbelieve what the scientist did.
Question 6: ‘It is more important to discover new ways of thinking about what is already known than to discover new data or facts’. To what extent do you agree with this claim?
- Both are imperial to what we know today. If there were no facts to think about there would be no way to think about them. If there were no way to think about the existing data and facts we couldn’t be able to analyze our data and facts. Both are necessary.
Question 7: ‘The vocabulary we have does more than communicate our knowledge; it shapes what we can know’. Evaluate this claim with reference to different areas of knowledge.
- Finding new vocabulary helps us to express what we know in more detail. We may be able to see something “that we can know” but without being able to express it in detail, or the way that we are thinking it there is no way of communicating this idea to others and to pass it on.
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
6. If you feel you require more information in a fact situation, outline the exact nature of the information clearly and specify how it would affect your decision, but do not contradict facts or assume the abnormal.…
- 3288 Words
- 14 Pages
Good Essays -
According to Sir Karl Popper, science is an ‘open’ belief system. An open belief system is where every scientist’s theories are open to scrutiny, criticism and testing by others. For example everyone has access to scientific information and none is kept away from the public or other scientists. Popper believes that science is governed by the principle of falsificationism whereby scientists seek to falsify existing theories by deliberate experiments that might produce information which would contradict the current theories. In Popper’s views, the growth of our understanding of the world is based on the discarding of falsified claims. Scientific knowledge is built upon as new claims arise which would mean it’s cumulative. Science as a sustainable and sturdy belief system is questionable. Despite great achievements, it isn’t possible to take the current theories as unquestionably true. For example, for centuries it was believed the sun revolved around the earth however, Copernicus falsified this knowledge-claim.…
- 1538 Words
- 4 Pages
Powerful Essays -
When we do anything, it is influenced by our past and the people around us. This is the same case for scientific concepts and theories as we try to compare and test them against what we have learned before, even if neither of them is factual or heavily supported by most people. For example, when my family and I were visiting an apartment, the landlord kept talking about the benefits of Vitamin C, referencing a novel. Once we left the complex, my father told us that there weren’t as many advantages to Vitamin C as the landlord had told us. Both of the landlord and I depended on certain people to determine what is right and wrong, but are either of us correct? On one hand, my father has enough experience to make him credible, but he didn’t give…
- 826 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
Different researchers have different ideas about the nature of knowledge or on how we come to know.…
- 416 Words
- 1 Page
Satisfactory Essays -
A. you'll write more lively sentences. B. you'll be able to spend more time reading. C. you'll spend less time on revision. D. you'll write longer sentences.…
- 968 Words
- 4 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
According to Popper science is an open belief system where every scientist’s theories are open to scrutiny, criticised and tested by others. He says that science is governed by the principle of falsificationism. This is whereby scientists set out to try and falsify existing theories, deliberately seeking evidence that would disprove them. Such as the fact that the big bang is a theory that everyone accepts but there is much more that scientists do not know and more needed to be found therefore it could be false. It argues that there always can be more and more evidence for every theory that has ever been made and proven. Then when disproving these knowledge claims allows scientific world to grow. It is cumulative, whereby it builds on achievements of previous scientists. This explanation shows that science can be a belief system as nothing can ever be proven 100% as there will always be something or someone that will disprove a theory with other evidence and therefore people belief what they have been told. This is much like religion in a way by the fact that religion cannot be proven it is something that people belief in.…
- 1795 Words
- 8 Pages
Better Essays -
"It is more important to discover new ways of thinking about what is already known than to discover new data or facts". To what extent would you agree with this claim.”…
- 574 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
We also need to have a decent amount of knowledge when it comes to simple features of our world for example how many and what our continents are called our natural power source the sun, our major oceans, water systems, some of our major land marks, animals etc. we need to know some of these things because most of those things effect our daily life!…
- 312 Words
- 1 Page
Satisfactory Essays -
In order to find their true meaning we have to look at how they are used and then come up with the true meaning. But what sometimes ends up happening is that the word can mean a so many things in many situations, which gets confusing. Rather they have many different meanings, which can only be found through text has to found through knowledge. Sometimes the meaning of words is so vague it is difficult to understand their meaning at all. Unless we are aware of the exact context in which it is being used, we would probably not agree on the subtle differences. Knowledge plays into affect by adding a whole new view to looking at a word. With knowledge, the interpretation of words can be figured out faster and more efficient. The way of interpreting the human language makes this method an efficient…
- 1328 Words
- 6 Pages
Good Essays -
Part A - When a metal is burned in a closed container, the mass of the container and its contents do not change.…
- 714 Words
- 3 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
To start with, the scientific method can allow us to uncover truth. It is needed to say that it allow us to uncover provisional truth. Truth can be provisional because we accept it may change over time, as new discoveries are made and the supposedly “truth” is no longer but it’s replaced by another and new “truth”. We accept one statement as true or not according to its degree of objectivity. Scientific method recollects empirical evidence, which is measurable and comparable and allows for the application of consistency tests. The application of consistency tests reduces the impact of subjectivity and the limitations of sense perception in the recollection of evidence. This allows us to construct explanations that are objective enough for society to define these explanations as provisional truth.…
- 1161 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
For me there are some fields of science that give us truth. An example of this science is Palaeontology. This science is the study of fossils from the pre-historic era during the early ages of the earth. They have evidences to support their claims that there are really pre-historic creatures that roamed the world. Evidences are strong to support their claim, these evidences are the fossils of the creatures. Like Dinosaurs, Apes, and the 1st man to roam the earth, etc. Scientist also base their studies from facts because without facts their study would mean nothing and it would not be accurate. It is like having a main idea without its supporting details. But there are some cases that scientist are just being bias to claim that their study is true, they don’t have enough proof to support their…
- 422 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
Some people scorn a scientific approach because of their faith in human intuition. Intuition can lead you astray. We presume that we could have foreseen what we know happened. Finding out something has happened makes it seem inevitable. Psychologists call this 20/20 hindsight vision the hindsight bias (the tendency to believe, after learning an outcome, that one would have foreseen it) also know as the I-knew-it-all-along phenomenon. Our everyday thinking is not limited to out after-the-fact common sense, but also by our human tendency to be overly confident.…
- 2740 Words
- 11 Pages
Better Essays -
So to answer the question at hand, I believe the arguments presented concludes that the knower’s perspective is essential in pursuit of knowledge, to a certain extent. It is observed that the perspective of the knower is not essential in all areas of knowing, history is an example. But in areas of knowing like natural sciences the perspective of the knower is essential. So to generalize, we could state that the perspective of the knower is essential if the area of knowing is not governed by static rules unlike history or mathematics where the facts are static and…
- 1554 Words
- 7 Pages
Powerful Essays -
is important because it challenges us to ‘expand our understanding in order to accommodate or…
- 779 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays