top-rated free essay

Thoughts on Fixing Congressional Gridlock

By talstarrr144 Aug 31, 2013 972 Words
It’s no secrets that, as of late, Congress has been plagued by gridlock, unable to efficiently pass public policy -especially successful public policy. Congress’s gridlock stems from two key problems: Congress members fixation on getting re-elected and a lack of incentive for ‘getting things done.’ With these key problems in mind, the most effective changes to break gridlock in Congress would entail a two-pronged plan: One, we restructure how campaigns are paid for. And two, we base a large portion of Congress member’s benefit and salary off of their performance and the effectiveness of the legislation they pass.

Today, most American politicians are “fundraisers first and legislators second,” which has numerous consequences (Sarbanes). Congressman John Sarbanes estimated that congressmen devote 30 to 70 percent of their time to fundraising -time that could be spent creating legislation and learning about policy issues (Lieu). Additionally, the unrestricted private campaign donations are undermining democracy, in a sense “buying the government,” while the people’s interests shift to the back seat. To reduce gridlock, we need our congress members time and energy devoted to legislation, and their votes dedicated to the people, not solely the Big Money minority. In accordance with the views of many grassroots leaders, I believe that we need a comprehensive overhaul of the election system. The first step is the reversal of Citizens United, a court case that led to the creation of super PAC’s when the Supreme Court ruled that the federal government cannot limit corporations (or unions, associations or individuals) from spending money to influence the outcome of elections (Liptak). The second step involves transferring power back to the people. As Lawrence Lessig, academic scholar and political activist, points out, “So long as elections cost money, we won’t end Congress’s dependence on its funders (Lessig).” Therefore, our second step must be to adopt a system of “small-dollar” public funding for congressional elections. In concordance with Lessig, I propose a $50 tax rebate that acts as a “democracy voucher.” People can give their voucher to any candidate of Congress, as long as that candidate agrees to only accept small contributions: vouchers or citizen donations capped at $100. Vouchers not used would pass back into the public funding system. There are numerous benefits from this type of system. Right off the bat, we have undermined the power of PAC contributions by making Congress members choose between big contributions or smaller voter contributions. Our system then revolves less around the 1% who have the resources to donate big contributions and more around the other 99% (Lessig). As Lessig notes, “Since a campaign would have to raise its funds from the very many, it could weaken the power of the very few to demand costly kickbacks for their contributions.” So not only are we redistributing power, but members are getting elected to carry out idea’s on their platform, not what their special interest contributors want.

The second part of my proposal entails remodeling the way we incentivize Congress members. Currently, members are fixated on getting re-elected. Instead of motivating them to work on legislation, this motivates Congress members to fundraise, which, as mentioned above, is a time and energy waster. I propose that we base Congress members eligibility for reelection off of their legislative accomplishments, specifically their budget proposals. Taking from Warren Buffet, we pass a law “that says anytime there’s a deficit of more than three percent of GDP, all sitting members of Congress are ineligible for re-election.(Crippen)” While coming up with an acceptable budget will never be easy, having their reelection on the line should incentivize Congress members to work together to successfully complete a budget. It’s worth noting that the Senate passed its first budget proposal in four years this year, a budget that many think will be shot down in the House (Barrett). What’s more, Congress members who can’t learn to compromise or propose a budget will be out, making room for Congress members who can do it. Through this process, we will motivate Congress members to pass the budget and weed out the uncompromising politicians who stand in the way of a reasonable and successful budget. Both congressional gridlock and the federal deficit could benefit from such a change.

There are many problems that arise with this two-pronged solution. Most significantly, legislation that puts Congress members re-election or campaign funds on the line will be unfavorable to them, the people in power. In order to pass something like that, we would need a strong grassroots movement, which, in fact, is being attempted by various grassroots leaders but is still a long way from being successful. However, the support seems to be there. According to a poll by No Labels (a grassroots movement group), 94 percent of registered voters believe congressional gridlock is “hurting the U.S. economy (Breaking the Gridlock: National Grassroots Movement No Labels Unveils Sweeping Action Plan to Make Congress Work).

While fixing the gridlock in Congress is easy to talk about, in reality, it’s hard to do. My proposal would take a large effort from a lot of people, an extraordinary grassroots movement. We’ve done before in the Civil Rights movement and hopefully we’ll be able to do it again soon with Congressional gridlock. The support is there and the dominos are starting to fall: In court right now, overturning Citizens United is being debated. What’s more, many present and former Congress members are taking charge of this issue, confronting Congressional gridlock and paving the way for change by starting grassroot movement activism. The first step in any change is getting reasonable idea’s to surface. That’s what we’ve been doing. Perhaps, within the next decade we will see some real impact from these circulating idea’s - change that might rank Congress higher than cockroaches, traffic jams, and Nickleback (Jensen).

Cite This Document

Related Documents

  • Legislative Gridlock

    ...“Legislative Gridlock” Jefferson states that a “government is best which governs least,” but what affect does government inaction have of on our society, and what are the forces that promote this inaction? The competition for power between separated institutions is a driving force in this inaction. When the legislative and executive b...

    Read More
  • Congressional

    ...solely to guard against suppression of State militias by the central government and is therefore restricted in scope by that intent; and (3) does not guarantee a right that is absolute, but rather one that can be limited by reasonable requirements. They ask why in today’s modern society a private citizen needs any firearm that is not desi...

    Read More
  • Sprawling Gridlock

    ...audacity and good luck.” California became an attraction to immigrants from within the State as well as all over the world with a dream of each family having their private home and making a fortune. In his essay “Sprawling Gridlock,” author David Carle analyses how the essence of the California Dream has faded away and slowly becoming ...

    Read More
  • Congressional Oversight

    ...1. Congressional oversight refers to oversight by the United States Congress of the Executive Branch, including the numerous U.S. federal agencies. Congressional oversight refers to the review, monitoring, and supervision of federal agencies, programs, activities, and policy implementation. Congress exercises this power largely through its...

    Read More
  • Spot Fixing

    ...Investigation details[edit] Sreesanth was arrested from his friend's house, whereas Chandila and Chavan were arrested from their team hotel in Mumbai.[2] Rajasthan Royals suspended the contracts of the three players until the investigation is complete.[3] Delhi police have claimed that Sreesanth and Chavan have confessed being involved in the...

    Read More
  • congressional letter which their military skills would be utilized, was voted down in Senate. Sponsored by Senator Patty Murray, "Veterans Jobs Corps Act of 2012", was thought to be a sure pass. The vote was 58-40; only 2 more votes were needed to pass this bill. This bill was effectively killed on the Senate floor by the Republican party on September, 19, 2012...

    Read More
  • Congressional Powers

    ...Constitution sets forth most of the powers of Congress, which include numerous explicit powers enumerated in Section 8. Constitutional amendments have granted Congress additional powers. Congress also has implied powers derived from the necessary-and-proper clause of the Constitution. Congress has authority over financial and budgetary matters,...

    Read More
  • Fixing Society

    ...the sari-sari store bench, Fr. Mon and the GKK purok leader approached us and gave us some instructions. Our team was divided into 4 GKK’s of Cogonon, 8 of us was left behind and the rest went on board the military truck heading towards another purok. Among the 8 volunteers, 3 of us manage the adults Crisis Intervention Procedure while the ot...

    Read More

Discover the Best Free Essays on StudyMode

Conquer writer's block once and for all.

High Quality Essays

Our library contains thousands of carefully selected free research papers and essays.

Popular Topics

No matter the topic you're researching, chances are we have it covered.