Gridlock Or Political Stalemate
In politics, gridlock or deadlock or political stalemate refers to a situation when the laws that satisfy the needs of the people are difficult to pass. The gridlock occurs when the proportion of bills passed and the legislative agenda decreases. In addition, the gridlock also can occur when the President and the majority in one or both houses of Congress are of different political parties. Achieving consensus on the new law is difficult when there are parties with such opposition point of views. The main causes Gridlock in Congress might be the worrying about the carry on indefinitely of new laws, the competition over "winning" and "losing.", and the fearing of change.
Firstly, policymakers understand that the new legislation can be implemented …show more content…
The distribution of "winning" and "losing" is just as the situation becomes more impassable because the party makes a recommendation on the law and is rejected by the other party. With no more than two-thirds votes, the requests will never be passed. And we all lose the opportunity to develop economic, political and legislation that most Americans know. To illustrate, after the mass shooting of 20 first graders at a Connecticut school, Congress began the legislative process of determining which designation are politically workable in the attempt to prevent gun violence. However, the Republicans against the ban on weapons – similar to a ban in place between 1994 and 2004 – and seem to be a movement toward a compromise on the gun-trafficking legislation. The gridlock seems like partly because members avoid debatable issues about a spending bill to pass when Congress is pursuing a moratorium on changing arm despite a series of mass shootings in a year. At the same time, the Democrat has repeatedly failed to pass a law that prevented people on the terrorist list of government buy guns. According to the lobbyists, the measure was not included in the spending bill. The polls show that public support for more stringent weapons laws, but the NRA is concerned and respected in Washington for its ability to mobilize gun
Firstly, policymakers understand that the new legislation can be implemented …show more content…
The distribution of "winning" and "losing" is just as the situation becomes more impassable because the party makes a recommendation on the law and is rejected by the other party. With no more than two-thirds votes, the requests will never be passed. And we all lose the opportunity to develop economic, political and legislation that most Americans know. To illustrate, after the mass shooting of 20 first graders at a Connecticut school, Congress began the legislative process of determining which designation are politically workable in the attempt to prevent gun violence. However, the Republicans against the ban on weapons – similar to a ban in place between 1994 and 2004 – and seem to be a movement toward a compromise on the gun-trafficking legislation. The gridlock seems like partly because members avoid debatable issues about a spending bill to pass when Congress is pursuing a moratorium on changing arm despite a series of mass shootings in a year. At the same time, the Democrat has repeatedly failed to pass a law that prevented people on the terrorist list of government buy guns. According to the lobbyists, the measure was not included in the spending bill. The polls show that public support for more stringent weapons laws, but the NRA is concerned and respected in Washington for its ability to mobilize gun