Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

Thomas Wolsey

Good Essays
1061 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Thomas Wolsey
Sarah Barker Wolsey’s Fall

Thomas Wolsey fell from his extreme height of power in 1529, but how? Wolsey had famously grown from a butchers son to one of the most powerful people in England at that time so what brought him to be accused of treason. Henry VIII trusted Wolsey as his right hand man for a long time and it has been argued that he saw him as his personal trust worthy servant but there have also been different opinions stating that Wolsey was the one who was manipulating the King to get what he wanted as he had an extreme amount of power, some argue even more than the King. "Wolsey was destroyed because he had become a liability in the eyes of the king and was expendable. This has fundamental implications for reassessing his relationship with Henry." (John Guy).
When Wolsey wasn’t able to get a divorce for King Henry and his first wife, Catherine of Aragon, he become angry and disappointed with him as he had not been able to do what he requested, even though Wolsey did offer a different solution to the problem Henry refused to listen and demanded that he was to get it done his way. As Wolsey wasn’t able to give the king what he demanded and was unable to change his mind on how to address the subject, he lost a lot of Henrys respect and trust. Peter Gwynn argues that Wolsey’s disappointing the king was the main reason that he fell as he states ‘the real architect of Wolsey’s fall is Henry himself: outraged at his Cardinals failure to secure an annulment of the Aragon marriage he brought his servant down in a fit of pique.’ The Kind had always blamed Wolsey for the failure to be able to get a divorce and so he had something against him, it is easy therefore to believe that it was in fact Henry VIII who made Wolsey plummet from his statue of power to having almost nothing.
There were also other factures in Wolsey’s life that should be considered, such as the fact that Anne Boleyn has been proven to dislike Wolsey and she had a great deal of control over Henry and was continuously trying to influence his opinion on him. This argument also revolves around the marriage and divorce of Catherine but from Anne Boleyn and her family’s view. As the divorce of Henry and Catherine and the marriage of Anne and Henry would make Anne and her family extremely more powerful and as high up as you can be without being in the royal family it is obvious that they wanted Henry to get the divorce sop that they could have this height in power. As Wolsey was the one Henry told to get this done they would have blamed him when it didn’t happen. This means that the Boleyn Family now dislike Wolsey; this is proven when Anne Boleyn writes a letter to Cardinal Wolsey in 1526 stating ‘the wrong that you have done me has caused me much sorrow.’ (Taken from source Y Pg. 53). Eric Ives, Her biographer, call’s Wolsey’s fall ‘First and foremost Anne’s success’. Her obvious dislike toward him should be taken into account. David Starkey also argues that there were battles between the Council and the court (‘minions’). Wolsey was often sending ‘The Gentlemen of the chamber’, who were the Kings close friends, away on foreign diplomatic trips and was able to get then expulsion from court in 1519. These factors would have helped the anti-Wolsey propaganda and therefore fuelling Anne Boleyn’s attempts to turn Henry against him. Although all of these factors should be considered in the overall opinion of how Thomas Wolsey fell from power it doesn’t seem that those alone are enough to destroy a smart man such as himself, therefore this is considered but it was not the main factor.
John Guy (historian) thinks that it Wolsey that made himself fall. He believes that Wolsey got to arrogant and obsessed with the amount of power that he had, he started by taking every order the King gave but then, over time, started advising the king and then simply telling him what was best. This behaviour was noted in as early as 1519 by the Venetian ambassador. The actions of Wolsey would have seemed treacherous to some and so it was his own fault that he was thought of in a negative view and got pushed down to have no authority at all, in Guy’s view.
There were many against Wolsey for many different reasons and it seems that as soon as they saw there change to, they would try to bring him down. It is obvious that a lot of people didn’t like him from comments such as ‘thus Wolsey, with his arrogance and ambition aroused against himself the hatred of the whole country’, written by Polydore Vergil in 1534. Polydore Vergil was an Italian humanist who disliked Wolsey as he sent him to the Tower of London and so was always to write unkind things about him but even though Vergil did have a personal grudge against him his words should still be taken into consideration as he was not the only one to write bad things about Wolsey as Ian Dawson wrote ‘any conclusion on Wolsey seems to carry out a air of disappointment’, in 1993. It is therefore fair to say that Wolsey was reasonably unpopular and had a few people who would gladly vote against him, also including Anne Boleyn and her family. As Wolsey was unable to get the divorce for Henry he did not just let down Anne Boleyn and her family but the King himself and as Henry’s ego was quite large he decided to blame the failure of being able to get a divorce on Wolsey even though he had given him an alternative answer that would get him the result that he wanted. As Wolsey upset the king he settled his fate and so when he started to fall all the people he had used his power on pushed him down even more. It is hard to say what specific thing it was that made him plummet from his height of power but it is easy to see how it happened.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Wolsey’s foreign policy during this period was also successful because he managed to adapt to the changing situation in Europe thus keeping England in a position of relative strength. For example after Charles V’s victory over Francis I at Pavia in 1525 Charles V turned down Henry 8th’s idea to split France between them. Instead of doing nothing Wolsey formed an alliance with France in August 1525 therefore changing sides and this led to the League of Cognac in May 1526 where there was a diplomatic revolution against Charles V from England, France, the Pope, Venice, Milan and Florence. This proves not only that Wolsey wanted to maintain peace in Europe and keep the balance of power but also that he was able to gain support from European powers and increase England’s standing in Europe.…

    • 635 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    However in source 6, it should be remembered that Henry is giving Wolsey an instruction which although giving him freedom too, shows that Henry was in overall control. Also, the report from Cavendish in source 4, is possibly un-reliable as there is a link that Cavendish, being Wolsey’s “friend and servant,” may be biased towards his master. This may lead him to possibly exaggerate the powers actually bestowed by Wolsey. Additionally, source 4 offers no indication of the year that this occurred in, as it is possible that Wolsey’s power worked throughout the ten year period depending on certain events. For example, throughout the French Invasion of 1512 and 1513, when Henry led on occasion 30,000 soldiers into France, it is clear that Henry was in control.…

    • 707 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Sources L and N agree that Henry and Wolsey conducted an effective foreign policy in the years 1515-25 although as source L is a painting it has a motive and probably a bias one whilst source M disagrees with the statement by highlighting ‘troubles associated from the Amicable Grant’.…

    • 785 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Source A also states, in agreement to the suggestion that Henry and Wolsey conducted an effective foreign policy in the years 1515-30, that “Wolsey had a good reason to think that they had been very successful” as “Henry knew that he was internationally regarded as a figure of splendid chivalric kingship” which were “increased by events such as those at the field of cloth in 1520” the…

    • 768 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The year of 1539 found the post-Reformation England in a delicate situation, facing the imminent peril of an allied invasion on religious grounds from both France and the Holy Roman Empire. One can refer to the English territory as to “a bone between two dogs”, this making Henry VIII a vulnerable monarch, isolated from the Roman Catholic states and lacking allies in Europe. As stated by D. Loades in “Henry VIII: Church, Court and Conflict”, “Henry remained apprehensive and when Francis and Charles signed a peace treaty at Toledo on 12 January 1539 he became almost paranoid.”…

    • 458 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Thomas Wolsey was Henry VIII chief minister from his rise to power in 1514 after working himself up until his eventual fall from the king’s favour in 1529. During the time period where Wolsey contained his power he made many changes to England’s domestic policies. For this reason I do not accept the view of source V that Wolsey’s domestic policies were completely disappointing.…

    • 275 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Another aspect was that Henry didn’t and couldn’t have a lot of victories, this was due to England being poor. Instead, the 20 year old French successor, Francis I invaded northern Italy and recaptured Milan from the Habsburgs. Francis, like Henry, wanted to be the centre of attention and he could afford to. Another person who made Henry look weaker, was Charles V who became the King of Spain, The Holy Roman Emperor and the Duke in the Netherlands, he was the ultimate ruler, whereas Henry lacked great titles so couldn't compete and couldn't improve his ‘warrior…

    • 597 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    From the devastating fall of Cardinal Thomas Wolsey, to the rise of his successor, the relentless Thomas Cromwell. Cromwell, throughout the course of English history has continually been portrayed as the main villain during Henry VIII’s reign, aside from Henry himself of course. A man, who thought nothing of betraying friends or allies in his conquest to secure the most notorious career in history. Since Henry VIII sent his chief minister and close advisor to the scaffold five centuries ago on 28 July 1540, historians have debated on the characterisation of Cromwell. Was he a manipulative death merchant who, throughout his political career killed and victimised thousands of innocent people for obeying their religious beliefs. Or was Cromwell simply a man of modest decent, risen from the ashes of his poor upbringing, due to his impeccable intelligence and determination?…

    • 254 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Wolsey was Henry VIII’s chief minister for 15 years and it’s fair to say that historians have, in general, been disappointed with his lack of achievement in the area of domestic affairs. Most argue that he devoted far too much of his time to foreign policy in order to establish, and then further boost his own personal power and increase his income, implying that more of his time should have been allocated to reforming social and economic policy and using his vast intelligence to improve the way government operated in England at the time. However there was very little contemporary discontent with the way the country was being run in the first place. So perhaps these expectations are anachronistically minded as the vast majority expected very little from the government; Rather than radical change in the systems of government they expected a maintaining of law and order along with an upholding of the power the Crown and Church held. Domestic achievements were never going to influence the status and prestige of England nearly as much as foreign politics, and as long as Henry craved foreign glory it was to be Wolsey’s focus. On the other hand though, certain efficiency in tax collection was needed to fund the adventurous foreign policies Wolsey needed to impose and of course stability in government was needed for diplomatic success. Not to mention the character of the man himself, he was unlikely to not want involvement in all political matters in government, whether foreign or otherwise. This natural zealous could go down as the reason for one of Wolsey’s key failing [in domestic policy] in that he took on far too much in terms of cases in the Court of the Star Chamber and failed to finish plans for reform.…

    • 2577 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    yo check it

    • 774 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Thomas Cromwell perceived by many historians to have been the second Wolsey, obtaining a majority of the power available within the power vacuum after Wolsey’s demise. He became the second most powerful man in England obtaining titles such as Lord Chancellor, he created several controversial reforms which made him unpopular and he made some potentially dangerous enemies at court, the enemies would overall be one of many factors which would lead to his execution.…

    • 774 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Henry the VIII wanted to end his marriage to Catherine of Aragon in 1527 with using an annulment, this was then Wolsey’s job to provide what the king wanted. Due to Wolsey’s constant victories, he was able to sustain power for 15 years, outlasting the King‘s other advisers. Yet his fall was swift and dramatic, which came after his failure of obtaining Henry’s divorce from Catherine of Aragon. In regards to this, it seems clear that this is the reason why Wolsey fell from power, yet there are possible contributing factors that must take into consideration. For instance Wolsey’s failure sometimes was out of his control as Queen Catherine was Charles V’s aunt so he would never accept the annulment in fear of hear being humiliated. Charles also had captured Pope Clement this meant that all decisions would have been controlled and manipulated to Charles’ will, delaying the annulment even more. Another failure that was out of Wolsey’s control was the role of factions within the court, Anne Boleyn and her family…

    • 992 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Wolsey had always caused resentment from the nobility, and this only grew as he became more dominant in Henry VIII’s government. Not only did nobles dislike him due to his low birth contrasted with his high positions, such as becoming Lord Chancellor in 1515, but resentment was also caused by his lavish lifestyle. Although opposition against him had got stronger throughout his career, this in itself was not significant enough to cause his fall. It was a factor that undoubtedly would’ve swayed Henry, however the ultimate reason for Wolsey’s fall was the failure to annul Henry’s marriage to Catherine of Aragon.…

    • 718 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Causes of Wolsey's Fakk

    • 1964 Words
    • 8 Pages

    It is possible to argue that the main cause of Wolsey’s fall was opposition from ‘an aristocratic party’. The line that reads ‘There can be no doubt that for long an aristocratic party, led by the dukes of Norfolk and Suffolk, had been hoping to… dispossess him’ clearly supports the above statement. Both Norfolk and Suffolk come from nobility, and at that time it was the nobles who had a lot of influence. However, following Wolsey’s rise to authority, he did not hesitate to use his power against the nobles. This resulted in him having many enemies along the way, with the majority being those from noble backgrounds. On the other hand, it is possible to argue that Wolsey’s failure to secure the annulment of Henry’s marriage with Catherine of Aragon also contributed to his fall. Source 6 consists of a letter written by Anne Boleyn to Wolsey that explains how he couldn’t live up to his ‘fine promises about divorce’, and she ends it by expressing how it brought her ‘much sorrow’. This is a significant factor as it was this that led Henry to the realization that Wolsey cannot actually give him everything he wanted, and made him appear inefficient. Furthermore his inability to annul the marriage angered Anne Boleyn, resulting in her disliking Wolsey even more than she did before. This was highly unbeneficial for Wolsey as at the time she had a lot of power over Henry’s decisions.…

    • 1964 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Source 4 is a letter written by Anne Boleyn, and she says “the wrong you have done me has caused me much sorrow”. Anne Boleyn suggests that she was betrayed by Wolsey “seeing myself betrayed by a man who pretended to support my interests”. Source 5 backs up the fact that Anne felt hostility towards Wolsey as it shows us the responses of letters Wolsey sent to the king in the hope that he will be reinstated. Thomas Cromwell wrote to Wolsey saying “None dares speak to the king on your behalf for fear of Madame Anne’s displeasure. Anne Boleyn has often been seen as a key figure in Wolsey’s fall. Certainly she had her reasons to despise the Cardinal as he had broken up her affair with Henry Percy in order that the King could claim his woman. Yet it was not in her interests to support any anti-Wolsey faction because until very late in the divorce proceedings he must has seemed like the one man who was capable of realising her dream of becoming Queen of England. Therefore it would be fair to say that although there was resentment and envy of Wolsey’s position and wealth, there was no long-term noble conspiracy against him because such actions were pointless while he held the trust of…

    • 843 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Firstly, source 7 agrees with this statement, and suggests that Wolsey was more of a partner to Henry then that of a servant. Its opening statement is “He is set so hye in his ierachy” which straight away enables us to establish that this person believes that Wolsey had extreme authorative power. Other quotes throughout the source also highlight this, such as “great astate” suggesting he lived in a huge palace. In those days wealth was greatly associated with power, so the fact Wolsey is known to live in a very grand house, suggests he is powerful, just like that of a king, and just as a partner would be. “Without any renayenge” Also suggests that he was very powerful, however it takes it to the extreme, as it is suggesting that complete power lay with Wolsey. Everyone had to agree with him and there was no opposition. This however can be contradicted, as Henry was always able to overrule any decisions that Wolsey made if he did not agree with them, for example, invading France when Wolsey advised him not to. This…

    • 965 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays