Preview

Essay On What Was Wolsey's Downfall

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
992 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Essay On What Was Wolsey's Downfall
Henry the VIII wanted to end his marriage to Catherine of Aragon in 1527 with using an annulment, this was then Wolsey’s job to provide what the king wanted. Due to Wolsey’s constant victories, he was able to sustain power for 15 years, outlasting the King‘s other advisers. Yet his fall was swift and dramatic, which came after his failure of obtaining Henry’s divorce from Catherine of Aragon. In regards to this, it seems clear that this is the reason why Wolsey fell from power, yet there are possible contributing factors that must take into consideration. For instance Wolsey’s failure sometimes was out of his control as Queen Catherine was Charles V’s aunt so he would never accept the annulment in fear of hear being humiliated. Charles also had captured Pope Clement this meant that all decisions would have been controlled and manipulated to Charles’ will, delaying the annulment even more. Another failure that was out of Wolsey’s control was the role of factions within the court, Anne Boleyn and her family …show more content…
Despite this being the main reason, it is true that Wolsey’s unpopularity was a factor that contributed as well, his many enemies at court provided reasons for Henry to remove him but Henry didn’t get rid of his straight away because Wolsey was able to do what he asked. However, when he failed, Henry took into consideration these enemies (especially the Duke of Norfolk because of his family ties with Anne Boleyn.) and his failures with gaining the nobilities favour. Therefore Wolsey’s ultimate downfall was the failure of not securing an annulment, but his unpopularity and minor failures such as the subsidies were contributing factors to the most important reasons of why he eventually fell from

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    However in source 6, it should be remembered that Henry is giving Wolsey an instruction which although giving him freedom too, shows that Henry was in overall control. Also, the report from Cavendish in source 4, is possibly un-reliable as there is a link that Cavendish, being Wolsey’s “friend and servant,” may be biased towards his master. This may lead him to possibly exaggerate the powers actually bestowed by Wolsey. Additionally, source 4 offers no indication of the year that this occurred in, as it is possible that Wolsey’s power worked throughout the ten year period depending on certain events. For example, throughout the French Invasion of 1512 and 1513, when Henry led on occasion 30,000 soldiers into France, it is clear that Henry was in control.…

    • 707 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The main success in foreign policy was Wolsey successfully delivering a policy of peace between 1511-25; this is shown in Source 4 where M.D. Palmer refers to the peace at London in 1518, where peace was agreed between twenty countries in Europe, as Wolsey’s ‘greatest triumph’, which it indeed was, at least for Wolsey if not just for England at the time. It’s outcome for Wolsey was appointment as papal legate which granted Wolsey the power to act on the Pope’s behalf which was a great deal of power to hold and definitely a success for Wolsey. The benefits of this peace for England were also quite significant as it meant England was no longer isolated as it previously had been as it was now a key player in European affairs as Henry and Wolsey wanted; this in turn also meant it presented a better image to the other European powers and instilled a sense that England was more powerful than it was in reality. As well as the Treaty of London, Wolsey also planned the events at the…

    • 1761 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 1511 Henry joined Pope Julius II, Ferdinand of Spain, and the Venetians in their Holy League against France. With his chief minister Thomas Wolsey he led his army to France in 1513, and captured Therouanne and Tournia. He returned to England after invading Scottish forces, which were under the control if James IV, and suffering a defeat at Flodden when Ferdinand deserted Henry having a secret truce with France. Henry in a quick effort to make peace married his sister Mary of England to Louis XII of France. The marriage, and peace, ended within a year with the death of Louis. Fransis I took the throne of France and quickly pushed the Scots against England. Ferdinand passed in 1516 enabling Thomas Wolsey to create a new alliance offer with France. This alliance soon expanded to include all the major European powers to pledge to a universal peace. Henry's daughter Mary was promised to marry the dauphin (heir to Frances throne). Six years later (1522) Henry joined Charles (Holy Roman Emperor) in a war against France. Henry’s role in this war was mostly unimportant except his heavy increase on taxes. This increase of course caused a resistance from parliament and the people. Charles won a very impressive victory against France in 1525 and denied England any of the profits. With the economy shaking Henry…

    • 1031 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    In 1534 England was ruled by King Henry VIII. “He ruled for 36 years during this time he married six different wives all to gain more political power.”[1] Two of his marriages ended in annulment, two from natural deaths, and the others from beheadings. What upset a lot of people from the Church of England is the fact that he wanted to annul his first marriage without receiving approval from the pope.…

    • 1588 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Another reason Richard lost was because of the support Henry had from the King of France. In 1485, the King of France wanted to distract Richard from invading France, so he gave Henry an army to invade England. When Henry landed in Wales with these extra men, many people joined him on his march through Wales to Bosworth, increasing the size of his army greatly.…

    • 474 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Source 3 supports the idea that Henry VIII’s foreign policy was actually quite successful; ‘Henry and Wolsey had good reason to think that they had been very successful’. Wolsey had gained immense status after the Treaty of London, when he became legatus a latere. Henry had successfully pulled off the field of cloth of gold (source 1), and was seen as peace keeper amongst the great powers since the 1518 Treaty of London. In conjunction with his successes in France in 1513, it was very easy for them to concentrate on how well they had done.…

    • 673 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Source A also states, in agreement to the suggestion that Henry and Wolsey conducted an effective foreign policy in the years 1515-30, that “Wolsey had a good reason to think that they had been very successful” as “Henry knew that he was internationally regarded as a figure of splendid chivalric kingship” which were “increased by events such as those at the field of cloth in 1520” the…

    • 768 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Clearly the death of Richard at the battle of Bosworth in 1485 was the final contributing factor to his demise, but it had certainly been brought about by Henry Tudor’s efforts and was undoubtedly not an event of simply sheer fortune for Tudor. It is the act of Richard breaking rank in a seemingly desperate final drive for victory that many site as the reason for the succession of Henry Tudor, though it is the events prior to this that determine whether Richard was left with no other choice.…

    • 803 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Thomas Wolsey was Henry VIII chief minister from his rise to power in 1514 after working himself up until his eventual fall from the king’s favour in 1529. During the time period where Wolsey contained his power he made many changes to England’s domestic policies. For this reason I do not accept the view of source V that Wolsey’s domestic policies were completely disappointing.…

    • 275 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Wolsey was Henry VIII’s chief minister for 15 years and it’s fair to say that historians have, in general, been disappointed with his lack of achievement in the area of domestic affairs. Most argue that he devoted far too much of his time to foreign policy in order to establish, and then further boost his own personal power and increase his income, implying that more of his time should have been allocated to reforming social and economic policy and using his vast intelligence to improve the way government operated in England at the time. However there was very little contemporary discontent with the way the country was being run in the first place. So perhaps these expectations are anachronistically minded as the vast majority expected very little from the government; Rather than radical change in the systems of government they expected a maintaining of law and order along with an upholding of the power the Crown and Church held. Domestic achievements were never going to influence the status and prestige of England nearly as much as foreign politics, and as long as Henry craved foreign glory it was to be Wolsey’s focus. On the other hand though, certain efficiency in tax collection was needed to fund the adventurous foreign policies Wolsey needed to impose and of course stability in government was needed for diplomatic success. Not to mention the character of the man himself, he was unlikely to not want involvement in all political matters in government, whether foreign or otherwise. This natural zealous could go down as the reason for one of Wolsey’s key failing [in domestic policy] in that he took on far too much in terms of cases in the Court of the Star Chamber and failed to finish plans for reform.…

    • 2577 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    King Henry VIII was a man known for being girl crazy, he seemed like he would want a new girl everyday. In a way he loved girls, but had no feelings for them. According to Lord Mountjoy to Erasmus, 1509 “He used to marry a new wife every day, and chop off her head next morning.”(Lord Mountjoy to Erasmus, 1509) He had been married six times; divorced four times, and beheaded two of them. He was the reason of getting rid of the pope’s power in England, because of the very reason of wanting to get a divorce. He was a relentless tyrant that wanted virtue, glory and immortality.…

    • 721 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Wolsey had always caused resentment from the nobility, and this only grew as he became more dominant in Henry VIII’s government. Not only did nobles dislike him due to his low birth contrasted with his high positions, such as becoming Lord Chancellor in 1515, but resentment was also caused by his lavish lifestyle. Although opposition against him had got stronger throughout his career, this in itself was not significant enough to cause his fall. It was a factor that undoubtedly would’ve swayed Henry, however the ultimate reason for Wolsey’s fall was the failure to annul Henry’s marriage to Catherine of Aragon.…

    • 718 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    alliance, marital bliss. King Henry ordered 72,000 executions during his reign, two of which were his wives. (Barksdale) Henry decided he didn’t need Pope Clement's approval to rule on issues concerning the church of England. Henry petitioned Pope Clements. However, he was rebuffed because of pressure from his first wife, Catherine’s, nephew. (History.com staff) Besides King Henry deciding he could just tule on everything without the pope he had been leading the country pretty well up until this point.…

    • 650 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Causes of Wolsey's Fakk

    • 1964 Words
    • 8 Pages

    It is possible to argue that the main cause of Wolsey’s fall was opposition from ‘an aristocratic party’. The line that reads ‘There can be no doubt that for long an aristocratic party, led by the dukes of Norfolk and Suffolk, had been hoping to… dispossess him’ clearly supports the above statement. Both Norfolk and Suffolk come from nobility, and at that time it was the nobles who had a lot of influence. However, following Wolsey’s rise to authority, he did not hesitate to use his power against the nobles. This resulted in him having many enemies along the way, with the majority being those from noble backgrounds. On the other hand, it is possible to argue that Wolsey’s failure to secure the annulment of Henry’s marriage with Catherine of Aragon also contributed to his fall. Source 6 consists of a letter written by Anne Boleyn to Wolsey that explains how he couldn’t live up to his ‘fine promises about divorce’, and she ends it by expressing how it brought her ‘much sorrow’. This is a significant factor as it was this that led Henry to the realization that Wolsey cannot actually give him everything he wanted, and made him appear inefficient. Furthermore his inability to annul the marriage angered Anne Boleyn, resulting in her disliking Wolsey even more than she did before. This was highly unbeneficial for Wolsey as at the time she had a lot of power over Henry’s decisions.…

    • 1964 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    This rebirth came after being embarrassed and humiliated by his marriages to Cleves and Howard. It is also important to recognise as Richardson does, that the reason the peace after 1545 is so uneasy is because of Henry’s achievements in war. No longer was there a balance in honour, therefore Francis was stuck in a peace he wanted to resolve - hence the continued sour relations that weren’t seen after the Field of the Cloth of Gold, which was otherwise similar in circumstances. The reason Henry VIII acted in such a reserved, and what has been interpreted as fearful way in 1539, was because of extent of the threat - the potential for a Catholic Crusade from a Habsburg-Valois alliance had a significant potential, in the wake of the Papal Bull of Excommunication against Henry VIII. Had the Treaty of Toledo been followed through it would have presented an existential crisis to the throne. However other explanations for his alliance seeking have been uncovered by McEntegart. He argues that, whilst security still remained a top priority, the king also had theological reasons for discussing with the Schmalkaldic League, exemplified by his considerations, at least on aspects of the Augsburg confession, in order to assist in creating uniformity in the Church. Furthermore he reveals the great plays of Cromwell’s faction in this period against the conservatives in order to further his heretical cause. This in turn led to Henry more closely seeking relations with the Schmalkalden as well as withdrawing from mainstream European politics. Security was secondary to honour, partially due to honour producing a security in its own right, at least in the eyes of Henry, but crucially due to the great focus that was still placed on the role of a chivalric and Godly…

    • 1339 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays