Preview

Thomas Paine Natural Rights

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1164 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Thomas Paine Natural Rights
Natural rights are the basic rights all humans hold that are not restricted or altered by human laws, cultures, and governments. Some people hold differing ideas about what these rights include but most follow Thomas Jefferson’s take on them which states “that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of Happiness.” The basic ideas being that all men are equal and free to live life. It is stated that a government infringing on these rights is grounds for the people to “. . . alter or abolish it, and to institute new Government. . .” in order to protect their rights. Thomas Paine follows these basic ideas of natural rights and accuses …show more content…
Americans thought that when the people of these countries overthrew their governments they would adopt more secular and progressive forms of government. Most of the governments of the countries involved in the Arab Spring follow various levels of sharia law from their judicial systems and law being based on it entirely to certain aspects of it being applied to their government. The leaders and governments that were overthrown most definitely did not follow any of the ideals expressed in Paine’s and Jefferson’s documents. Many of the leaders have been put on trial or accused of violating human rights laws and corruption, the laws of these governments also violate Paine’s and Jefferson’s documents by creating unequal opportunity and restrictions on the freedoms of their citizens. Then new governments put in place were largely unsuccessful in the short term besides the country of Tunisia who successfully transitioned to a democratic system of government. Other countries had power struggles and civil war erupt when their governments attempted to violently put down protests. The governments now are torn between secularists and Islamists fighting for political power. The new governments do not fully follow natural rights as Americans see them. They still discriminate against religion and gender, for example, in Egypt, a …show more content…
We see these freedoms as non-negotiable since we are born with them and a person cannot be stripped of these natural rights at a later date. These views come from the colonists in America fighting against unfair rule by the British who they believed infringed on their natural rights as human beings. America gained independence and based the government on these values being non-negotiable. Although we see these as non-negotiable natural rights in our country not every country in the world agrees with us. We are incorrect to impose these values on foreign cultures even if it might help that country. If they are not supportive of these values then they should be left alone as long as they don’t try to force their values on anyone but their own country. Forcing American values on foreign cultures is not consistent with America itself. America is a large country with a diverse population of different races and cultures. You are free to live how you want as long as you don’t infringe on other’s freedoms. By trying to force American values on foreign countries we are being inconsistent. By forcing our sense of values or right and wrong on other parts of the world we can end up hurting our national security, for example, ISIS being formed after we tried to push American values in that part of the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    These are the rights that all individuals born into the United States of America are naturally given, or the naturalized have. These rights include life, liberty, the pursuit of happiness, to share values of equality, freedom and justice. These are the rights that are unalienable and they are explained in the social contract that the government should protect these rights. The King violated this.…

    • 463 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Common sense is greatly credited with encouraging the colonists to finally establish themselves independently from Britain as Thomas Paine attacked the principles of hereditary rule and monarchial government. He believed that society is constructive in that people join together to accomplish common goals and the government’s role is to protect the citizens from their own vices, thus being a necessary evil.…

    • 446 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    “Wisdom is not the purchase of the day, and it is no wonder that we should err at the first setting off”…

    • 268 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    What Paine sees as the global significance of the American struggle for independence is human rights. Human rights here is also included the right to be free from monarchy that also means to be free from British empire. Paine insisted that, as “a membership in the British empire, was a burden to the colonies, not a benefit.” Paine believe that if we were free from British empire, “the colonies could for the first time trade freely with the entire world and insulate themselves from involvement in the endless imperial wars of Europe”(Foner 153).…

    • 287 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Thomas Paine was one of our nations founding fathers and one of the greatest pamphleteers of all time. He was responsible for many influential writings including Common Sense, Crisis, and The Rights of Man, his response to Edmund Burke's criticism of the French Revolution. In this declaration, Paine's message is that of a need for a Republican government that understands and carries out the natural rights of all men. Paine claims that despotism such as what was in place in France before their revolution, holds the people in ignorance and degrades them. A monarchy should never be in power because they too often do not pay attention to each individuals rights.…

    • 494 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Natural liberty is defined as the “Evil” liberty. It is when men act as beasts and other creatures. Meaning that mankind has the right to choose what they feel like and who to obey. The natural liberty according to John Winthrop goes against authority, god, and purity. When Anne Hutchinson and Roger Williams went against John Winthrop and chose to follow natural liberty they were both kicked out of the Massachusetts colony.…

    • 284 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Henry, Paine, Freedom

    • 390 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Two important persons in the American Literature are Thomas Pain and Patrick Henry trying to help the colonist to get their freedom from the Britain. Paine tried to bring the colonists in to reality in his speech. He wanted to remained the colonists how badly the supreme British were treating them. On the other hand Henry tried to persuade the colonists to go to war, using Britain as the enemy, but they tried to persuade the audience, by using different ways.…

    • 390 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    I believe that Thomas Paine was right. I also think that he knew that America was going to be known as a place for new people. America has insurmountable amounts of different people from all over the world. The American population consisted of a lot of different beliefs, ways of living, cultures, languages, and ways of worship, prayer, thoughts of government, and many more aspects. Immigration is one way the government has put in for a description of others around the globe for coming hereto America. Over half of America’s population is from immigration. That is what makes America, America. I really don’t have anything bad nor good to say about immigration, so right now I can care less about immigration in this country.…

    • 367 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    On November 20, 1772, Samuel Adams, one of the Founding Fathers, delivered a report from the Committee of Correspondence to the Boston Town Meeting called “The Rights of the Colonists” (CITE!!!) In it, Adams discusses the rights of the colonists as men, Christians, and subjects.…

    • 128 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Thomas Paine Ideals

    • 625 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The ideals of a nation with peace are built around justice-regardless of race, gender, and religion. It is built around the ideals of freedom--regardless of race, gender, and religion. They are built around liberty--regardless of race, gender, and religion. If any governing powers are able to grant such ideals and implement them into society, it is a prosperous nation. The reason America fought for independence from the British was because of the abuse and inability to adhere to these basic principles. The new settlers saw what their government was and made a new government in which they implemented justice, freedom, and liberty. Among those who saw visions of this new prosperous nation was Thomas Paine. Paine was an intellectual revolutionary, who immensely supported the American Revolution. Born in in England he saw the…

    • 625 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Thomas Paine was a well known supporter of American Independence in England. America consists of the variety of religions, races, languages, and cultures. It can be concluded that it is essentially difficult for individuals to essentially assimilate and form a sense of unity. It has the ability to cause disruptions among each other as a result from the interactions of the differences. Paine presents his argument in, Rights of Man that a simple establishment of government will ultimately diminish the issues and furthermore create an equal justification. It is critical that the government overall creates unification between individuals and enforces appropriate laws; however, Paine’s characterizations does not hold accountability in portraying…

    • 126 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    John Adams Enlightenment

    • 340 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Natural Rights is when every man has natural rights given by God. John Adams believed in Natural Rights. He said in John Adams, On Natural Rights, Essay on the Canon and Feudal Law “Let us see delineated before us, the true map of man — let us hear the dignity of his nature, and the noble rank he holds among the works of God! that consenting to slavery is a sacrilegious breach of trust, as offensive in the sight of God, as it is derogatory from our own honour, or interest, of happiness; and that God Almighty has promulgated from heaven, liberty, peace, and good will to man.”. In other words he is saying follow the natural rank given by God, slavery is offensive in God’s eyes; God made it clear from heaven that people should have liberty and peace.…

    • 340 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Rights of Man, Thomas Paine extols America for its unique attributes of harmony, freedom, liberty, and diversity. These attributes intertwine together and serve as a recipe for one unified country based on privileges and rights for all Americans. Paine’s image of America was slightly skewed in the late 18th century, but holds true especially in today’s day and age. Over the past two centuries, change and reform have transformed the nation into one which provides equality to all regardless of color, sex, or background. Slowly but surely, citizens have fought for and won freedoms which define this country. I believe that Paine’s portrayal of America wasn’t right then, but it is now. After countless struggles, Americans have been able to expose the equal principles of society which Paine admires.…

    • 934 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Enlightenment viewed human rights as something that all people possessed. As John Locke said, all people are entitled to “life, liberty, and the ownership of property.” He also argued that the government should protect these rights.…

    • 129 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Thomas explains in “Individual Rights: The Objectivist View”. He writes, “What does it mean to have rights? A right is an absolute political claim. If you have right to some land, other people ought to permit you to have it. If you have a right to vote, nobody should prevent you from voting. If animals have rights, then we mean that no one ought to harm them. Rights are political claims because they pertain to what the law can or can’t force you to do, and what it can or can’t force others to do for you. Rights are not a physical property of human beings. They aren’t encoded in your DNA, rooted in your hair follicles, or readable via an iris-scanner. But they aren’t just a moral fashion statement, either: it’s wrong to say someone has a right simply to cheer for whatever the right stands for. I think it would be grand if people would travel to Mars. However, that alone doesn’t give someone a right to travel to Mars. Moreover, if you have a right, you have a right to do wrong, too. Your right to vote isn’t just a right to vote for good candidates: it’s a right to vote for the bad ones, too, if that’s your choice. In fact, rights are principles. Properly understood, they objective moral principles that provide the foundation for political-legal order. No law should violate rights. Rights are “self-evident” and “unalienable “because they are derived from facts about human nature. They are principles defining the fundamental freedoms and responsibilities that people…

    • 1373 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays