Preview

There are no effective checks on presidential power

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
963 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
There are no effective checks on presidential power
‘There are no effective checks on presidential power.’ Discuss (45) Presidential powers are laid out in article II of the constitution, these include a range of formal power such as the power to propose legislation, submit the annual budget, sign legislation, veto legislation, act as chief executive, nominate federal judges and several others. There are also a range of informal powers that have progressively increased in power such as the ability for Presidents to issue executive orders. Although the founding fathers intended to create a government that had a system of checks and balances to prevent tyranny, the effectiveness of these checks in place may not have been as authoritative as intended as the President has ways of getting around the checks in place.

The ability for the President to veto legislation through the use of a regular veto or in some instances a pocket veto indicates the power of the President to be able to bypass Congress’s efforts to pass legislation. Although Congress has the ability to override the veto with a 2/3 majority in both houses and provide a check on presidential power, this has rarely been successful, reflected in only 106 of 1,484 regular presidential vetoes being overridden by congress between the years of 1789 and 2004. Furthermore, the threat of a veto has often been sufficient in bargaining with congress to ensure that the President is not presented with a bill that he is going to veto straight away, thus the effectiveness at which this power is checked can be questioned as the President has a way of getting around the check that is in place by Congress.

One of the powers that the President has is his ability to negotiate treaties although in order for these formal international agreements to come into effect, they must be ratified by 2/3 of the Senate. This means that the President needs to keep the senate fully informed throughout treaty negotiations to ensure that Senate is likely to ratify the treaty through a

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Key Point: "Presidential power is the power to persuade." (11) Presidents are expected to do much more than their authority allows them to do. Persuasion and bargaining are the means that presidents use to influence policy. Not only do presidents need to bargain to influence other branches of government (particularly Congress), but presidents also must bargain to influence the executive branch itself; cabinet secretaries, agency heads, and individual bureaucrats all have leverage that they can use against the president, requiring presidents to persuade even the executive branch, not merely command it.…

    • 1972 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The President is the commander- in-chief of our armed services, he can veto congressional legislation, and he nominates judges. The legislative Branch controls the budget, approves the Presidents nominations, can pass laws over the president’s veto, and can impeach and remove the president from office. The Senate confirms the nominations for judges. The Judicial Branch can declare laws unconstitutional, declares presidential acts unconstitutional.…

    • 471 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The success of these reforms depends on his relationship with the Congress, as it is the “central link “in America’s politics. The president has no power over Congress because of its separation of the Executive and Legislative branches so he has to rely on bargaining and persuasion, good tactics and good timing. The way the president’s relationship with the Congress is conducted is through agenda setting, lobbying and the power of recommendation. He does have the power of veto over a bill but any president has rarely used…

    • 439 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The last official power of the President is call Inherent power. Inherent powers are powers the President has because of who he/she is. They are neither stated in the Constitution, nor considered an implied power. “The argument for inherent powers is that certain powers are inherent in the office and therefore so not require any specific legal authorization.” (The Presidency,…

    • 417 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Both articles covering the Executive Branch and presidential power claim that both President Bush and President Obama used their power to a greater extent than what was laid out in Article II of the Constitution by the founders. Powers of the U.S. president should not be diminished for future executives later on down the line because Congress allows a lawless executive branch, or lose authority if we aggrandize the options by restricting the president to his constitutional powers. Would there be a reason to the president? In one of the articles Obama is called a monarch, although he is not. Ted Cruz explains the president’s executive order on amnesty by calling it a lawless act. In the other article The Founders’ Great Mistake, by Steve Brodner…

    • 681 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    He can make legislative proposals, set priorities to influence Congress agenda along with bargaining Concessions for votes, this goes along with the Power of Persuasion with the access of media in terms of Bully Pulpit, and in other words this is the real power of the presidency were he use this power to persuade citizens into following his lead. Another informal power of the president is making executive agreements, International agreements made by the president that has the force of treaty. In addition to, the president being able to sign statements which is considered an excessive power, usually the president merely will comment on the bill being signed, expressing whether it is a good legislation or meets some pressing needs. In other cases it involves claims by the president stating parts of the legislation is unconstitutional and will tend to be…

    • 334 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Which later the president gets to say yes or no to the new bill idea. An executive power is stated by the senate who must confirm all major appointments made by the president. The implied power is what powers necessary to allow presidential exercise of expressed powers for the president. Which provided the delegated power which grants constitutional powers that are assigned to one governmental agency and another agency with express permission of the first. One of the president’s presidential power is commander-in-chief. This role is the most important because the meaning of being commander-in-chief is that the president decides if the laws go to plan and continues them or stop and have them better the bill. Basically having the power to sign or veto the laws congress are trying to pass. The presidency has expressed powers that are specific powers granted by the constitution to congress and to the president In the same process in this branch we have the Federal bureaucracy which is contained of staffed with office who are experience and expertise in the public policy. They are in charge of making the rules and regulations easier or harder to do. The Judicial branch takes part in the…

    • 636 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The theory finds validation in an expansive interpretation of Article II of the Constitution where it states that “the executive Power shall be vested in a President of the United States of America”, thus granting the president a range of powers that are not specified in Article II to “take care that the laws be faithfully executed.” This differs from the other two vesting clauses in the Constitution in the sense that it is vesting power into a single individual, rather than a body such as Congress or the judiciary. Application of this theory is evident in the expanding power of the executive, and the extension of existing executive powers such as national security powers, executive orders, and even presidential signing statements. In the area of national security, the theory of the unitary executive would justify the president’s power to make unilateral decisions concerning the state of war the country is in, without the consent of Congress. The increasing use of executive orders is also evidence of the application of ideas rooted in the unitary executive theory because it reflects the president’s ability to unilaterally accomplish goals of the administration. Presidential signing statements are also evidence of the appropriation of the…

    • 1190 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    A president may veto legislation affecting the use of power tools, or in order to pursue his or her legislative agenda for strategic policy chips. This is especially true when the president the right to use in the policy, which is the ability to veto the bill because the president's objections, not only because of whether the bill is compatible with the Constitution or concerns has passed according to the correct procedure. In the United States, for example, increase the use of the veto as a "political weapon" yes "allows the President to be more involved in legislative matters, and has changed the President, Congress dynamic, so that Congress is no longer the dominant force in government, because it is the nineteenth century "(2007 Slezak:…

    • 417 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Obama

    • 6377 Words
    • 26 Pages

    Among recent presidents, Gerald Ford used vetoes adroitly, issuing 66 during 21/2 years. During interviews for my political biography of Ford, he spoke proudly of this record, considering it one of his best legacies. A former House minority leader, Ford knew Congress well and stressed…

    • 6377 Words
    • 26 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The president is the elected leader of a republic. The president of any country has limits to their power. These limits come from the people as well as a constitution or written law that outlines what they can and cannot do. In regard to America’s government, the president cannot declare war or make laws singlehandedly. He or she would need assistance from the other branches of government, the legislature, the judiciary or both. This system of checks…

    • 562 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Interest Groups

    • 749 Words
    • 3 Pages

    It is commonly state that the President of the United States of America is one of the most powerful persons in the free world. However due to the restriction set by our constitution and a system of checks and balances, these powers are split between the Executive, Judicial and Legislative branches. The president being a part of the executive branch his/her main role is to approve or veto bills that have gone through the legislation introduction and voting process. With the veto process, congress have the ability to override the president’s decision to veto a bill, with two-thirds majority vote from members of the house or representatives and the senate. One other stipulation is if the president decides or do not respond to the bill proposal…

    • 749 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The President is able to exercise legislative power, namely the power to create legislation as well as the power to pass or veto bills. Despite these powers the President is restricted by in his power by the parameters of…

    • 170 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    term paper us politics

    • 1233 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In the United States of America the executive branch and the legislative branch deal with foreign policy making. The executive power is vested in the president of the United States and the legislative branch consists of the Senate and House of representatives which is the Congress. The President and the Congress of the United States both play an important role in our relations with other countries and how we negotiate treaties or declare actions of war on them. The President and the Congress must first come to an agreement before any action is taken. The congress are the ones who balance out the president's power and allow for better decision making since they are a larger group of individuals. Private citizens of the United States of America are not allowed to practice foreign policy leaving the job to the President and the Congress of the United States.…

    • 1233 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Characteristics for which parliamentarism lacks, those being more power in regard to the executive and selection of cabinet members. It is evident that the President, as leader of the executive, is granted more exclusive power than that of a Prime Minister under a parliamentary system of government. The two most regarded powers of the President are the legislative veto and decree power. The constitutional veto power given to the executive allows the President to reject a proposed bill from the legislature that is in consideration to become law (Cheibub, "Systems of Government" 3). In most bicameral systems, which contain two chambers of a particular branch, require a 2/3 majority in order to override a presidential veto (Carey 107). Whereas, in a parliamentary system of government it is more difficult to achieve as a supermajority is needed in most cases (Cheibub et al. 530). Therefore, a presidential government has a stronger veto power when compared to the veto power of a parliamentary. Decree power, however, is defined as the ability for the executive to create laws without legislative approval (Carey 103). Most commonly referred in the United States as the President's ability to make executive orders aside from legislation that comes directly from Congress. Here the President works separately from the legislature to pass initiatives that are…

    • 1725 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays