Preview

Theory X and Theory Y

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1711 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Theory X and Theory Y
TABLE OF CONTENT

NO | TITLE | PAGES | 1 | 1.0 THEORY X1.1 THEORY X ASSUMPTIONS | 2-3 | 2 | 2.0 THEORY Y2.1 THEORY Y ASSUMPTIONS | 4-5 | 3 | 3.0 BIG FIVE PERSONALITY TRAITS-OPENNESS-EXTRAVERSION-NEUROTICISM-CAREFULNESS-SOCIABILITY | 6-11 |

1.0 THEORY X

What is theory X? The “Theory X” management theory holds that the average employee has little ambition, dislikes work and must be coerced, controlled and directed to achieve organizational objectives. Those in management who believe the behavioral assumption of “Theory X” take an autocratic approach to get work done.
This theory which has been proven counter effective in most modern practice, management assumes employees are inherently lazy and will avoid work if they can and that they inherently dislike work. An example is the time clock. You have to clock in partly because the management thinks you'll arrive late and leave early if you don't.
This theory assumes human beings inherently dislike work and distasteful towards work. However, as we know, this theory also emphasizes that people do not have ambitions and they shirk responsibilities. As employees, we must do the work efficiently, responsibly, and make our managers proud with us.
This theory also assumes that people creativity. Each person has their own creativity. People nowadays lack of self-motivated and require to be externally controlled. So, they should be prepared if anything happen unlucky because of their lack-motivated. It emphasizes upon centralization of authority in decision-making process.

1.1 THEORY X ASSUMPTIONS

There are the Theory X Assumptions:

* Manager is responsible for organizing the elements of productive enterprises like money, material, equipment; people are in the interest of economic ends * People do not like work and try to avoid it. * Managers have to control, direct, coerce, and threaten employees to get them to work toward organizational goals. * People prefer to be

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Cake Consulting

    • 13842 Words
    • 56 Pages

    The current managerial strategy used is the classical managerial strategy “that assumes most employees inherently dislike work but can be induced to work in order to satisfy their economic needs” (Long, 2010, 29). This has caused employees to believe that they are not valued and can be easily replaced at the management’s discretion.…

    • 13842 Words
    • 56 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    According to Kreitner and Kinicki (2013) McGregor contrasted two views on human nature by insisting that Theory Y assumes that people are more positive at work, and believed managers could accomplish more by viewing employees as such (p.9). The other outdated theory, is Theory X, which is a more negative and pessimistic assumption about workers.…

    • 1718 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    mgt 330

    • 3306 Words
    • 14 Pages

    2. Be familiar with Theory X and Theory Y managers (teachers). (Table 1-2, p. 7) Outdated Theory X – most people hate work and need to be directed, they must be threatened with punishment before they will work….Modern Theory Y – work is natural, people can direct themselves, people will become oriented with organizational goals is they are rewarded for doing so, typical employee can welcome responsibility, typical person is creative, imaginative and has ingenuity.…

    • 3306 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 1960, Douglas McGregor wrote The Human Side of Enterprise, which framed two sets of molds about human nature. The first one is Theory X is unenthusiastic and negative. It assumptions people don’t like working and must be forced to do their work, avoid responsibility and have little motivation. As Kopelman and et al. (2012) stated “the manager who holds Theory X beliefs may unwittingly engineer a low level of employee motivation and (ironically) lament to a colleague that you can't get good workers nowadays” (pg. 451). Theory Y is the counterpart. In this Theory, mangers assume employees can be self-motivated, committed, responsible and creative workers. Whole Foods hires people that are well-trained who flourish in their workplace because they are happy with their jobs. John Mackey, the Cofounder and Co-CFO believes that “happy team members result in happy customers (Kreitner & Kincki, 2012).…

    • 1087 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    MSA 601 PHILOSOPHY SIGLAR

    • 1042 Words
    • 4 Pages

    McGregor’s Theory Y assumptions include: work is a natural activity, people are capable of self-direction and self-control, people generally become committed to organizational objectives if…

    • 1042 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    McGregor grouped employees hierarchy need into lower-order needs (Theory X) and higher-order needs (Theory Y), and opined that “these two opposing perceptions conjectured how people view human behavior at work and organizational life” (Wambugu, 2014). For instance, Theory X assumed that management's role in the organization is to pressurize and control employees to perform based on the insinuation that human beings are pressure seekers who dislike work; do not want responsibility, and have little or no ambition etc. as such it's the duty of managers to make them do their job, and often with threats of punishment in order to get them to achieve the organizational objectives. On the other hand, Theory Y assumed that management's role in an organization involves developing the potential in employees and help them to achieve their maximum potential towards common organizational goals based on the views that people among other things learn to accept and seek responsibility, creativity, ingenuity which will have the potential to boost the organizational performance (Wambugu, 2014). These theories could be used by management either ways to encourage employees, but better results would be gained by the use of Theory Y, rather than Theory X (McGregor,…

    • 3719 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    According to a number of different studies on behavioral approach to management, especially that of McGregor’s Theory X and Theory Y, manager’s expectations on workers through the self-fulfilling prophecies will affect workers’ attitudes and hence their productivity. Essentially, McGregor’s theory of X and Y introduces two types of behaviors of managers. The first type, which McGregor considers inappropriate, thinks that workers they are irresponsible, lack of ambition, dislike their work and will only do the things that they have been told. The second type, however, thinks that workers are always motivated to work, willing to take responsibility and are willing to take extra steps. By analyzing BCH’s current approach to management, we will be able to consider how the study on behavioral approach to management can be realistically incorporated and therefore create greater value to the company.…

    • 437 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Taylor’s scientific management theory is a very straight forward theory with all thinking to be for the managers, ‘every man who gets on this job has got to lay bricks my way’ (Pugh, D (1997). Organization theory p294), this quote typifies Taylor’s theory, with his belief that workers were lazy and ‘managers do the thinking and workers obey’ (Fincham, R, Rhodes, P (1999). Principles of Organizational Behaviour p258) This theory means the workers do no thinking and just do what the managers ask of them, with the idea of maximizing efficiency through the worker being told the exact way to perform the task and completely focusing on completing their work quick. It is argued that Taylorism leaves workers brain dead due to the lack of thought, basically turning the workers into machines. Taylor has no faith in workers and believes they are lazy, it could be argued that in order to motivate workers having so little faith in the workforce leads to a decrease in motivation.…

    • 2020 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Theory X being the pessimistic as the employee does not like work and tries to escape it whenever possible and has little or no ambition of achieving the company goals. Employee needs a directive leader. Theory X leader is results-driven, intolerant, distant, poor listener, demands, etc. Companies with Theory X leadership will usually have poor results.…

    • 2097 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Brainstorming Case

    • 754 Words
    • 4 Pages

    - Organizational analysis: as mentioned above there can be a problem in the incentives and rewards that employees get for their work. Its possible that employees are discouraged for the hard work they do so they would be demotivated to follow the goals, policies and procedures that the work place requires them to…

    • 754 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Motivation and Employees

    • 2237 Words
    • 9 Pages

    “Because people dislike work, most people must be coerced, controlled, directed and threatened with punishment to get them to put forth adequate effort toward the achievement of organizational objectives.” – Excerpt.”…

    • 2237 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    believe that people are not ambitious and prefer to be directed. People are basically irresponsible…

    • 10952 Words
    • 44 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Theory X and Y

    • 1396 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Douglas McGregor 's XY Theory, managing an X Theory boss, and William Ouchi 's Theory Z…

    • 1396 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Theory X managers believe that their employees want to be managed. That they are lazy. That they do not want to improve themselves and need constant monitoring.…

    • 2434 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Adams’ Equity Theory

    • 400 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The theory is built-on the belief that employees become de-motivated, both in relation to their job and their employer, if they feel as though their inputs are greater than the outputs. Employees can be expected to respond to this is different ways, including de-motivation (generally to the extent the employee perceives the disparity between the inputs and the outputs exist), reduced effort, becoming disgruntled, or, in more extreme cases, perhaps even disruptive.…

    • 400 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays