Preview

The Three Characteristics Ways of Meeting Oppression

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
511 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Three Characteristics Ways of Meeting Oppression
According to Martin Luther King Jr., what are the three characteristic ways in meeting oppression?

The Three Characteristics Ways of Meeting Oppression

Martin Luther King Jr.'s "The Ways of Meeting Oppression" is a division and classification essay in which King explains the ways in which oppressed people meet oppression. He states that, historically, oppressed people have responded to their oppression in negative ways either resulting in their total destruction or prolonging their oppression. King challenges the oppressed Negro to meet oppression positively and effectively. In the essay, he examines the three characteristics ways of meeting oppression. He divides these ways and classifies each ranging from the ineffective to the most effective way of meeting oppression. In his examination, King characterizes acquiescence, violence, and nonviolent resistance as the three characteristic ways of meeting oppression.

First, King describes acquiescence as the most passive and ineffective characteristic way of meeting oppression. King declares that this way of meeting oppression is a way in which the oppressed resign themselves to their doom. In addition, he explains that this characteristic way is ineffective because "the Negro cannot win the respect of his oppressor by acquiescence, it will be interpreted as proof of the Negro's inferiority" (382). According to King, the Negro cannot win the respect of the white people if he is willing to sell the future of his children for his personal and immediate comfort and safety.

Second, King explains that while violence is not a passive characteristic, it is an equally ineffective way of meeting oppression. He notes that though violence may bring momentary results, "it solves no social problem; it merely creates new and more complicated ones" (382). He explains that violence is a behavior that is intended to hurt-physically. According to King, to resort to physical violence or corroding hatred is both impractical

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    When Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. wrote this part of his speech he intended to deliver a message instilling rebellion in his audience. Recognizing that no one likes to be talked down to, his is use of words that were not commonly used by those he spoke to, were carefully crafted to convey a feeling of respect for his audience. Because he was a Baptist pastor, he freely uses biblical references. Through the use of negative terms such as “yolk of oppression” and “negative freedom” Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. discounted options to what he terms as “peaceful resistance”. Such resistance is, according to him, different from passivity and he explains how this is not the same as acceptance of oppression. Mid speech, Dr. King allows the speech the…

    • 217 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Martin Luther King Jr. spoke about oppression and oppressed people. King states 3 ways on how people meet oppression. The first of which is acquiescence, which means that they reluctant acceptance of something without protest. The second physical violence and corroding hatred. King strongly states that violence never, and will never bring peace. The third is by nonviolent resistance, where the struggle to reconcile the truths between the black people and the white people.…

    • 194 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    address the criticism of the white clergymen by claiming that the path to brotherhood is nonviolent direct action. He developed this statement by claiming that, “Unjust laws are now laws at all,” “‘Wait’ have almost means ‘no’” and, “Oppressed people cannot remain oppressed forever.” Throughout the story, King uses many rhetorical devices to help develop and refine his…

    • 1359 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    King lists numerous reasons to not obey an unjust law. They each speak to his conviction regarding the importance of complete equality between all people.…

    • 387 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    King said that before anyone takes direct action, the protester first needs to “purify” (567) their soul so that he or she will have no regrets going forward. Taking direct action is the right path but, it needs to be understood that there will be consequences for those actions. Taking a stand has never been easy and can be extremely difficult, but for the future progress of the African American, it was necessary. The protester needed to possess a firm moral conviction that their cause was a righteous and just cause. By combining nonviolent resistance, direct action, and a firm conviction of their cause, King was confident that the oppressors would come to join him in the quest for equality. All other issues would fade away and the only thing left to see would be the true issue, a "good versus evil"…

    • 668 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    King, however, didn’t advocate citizens transcending the law, but rather, Dr. King believed that in order to remedy injustice in society, people must openly break the unjust law and accept punishment in showing “highest respect for the law”(King p.23). In a rather interesting yet extreme example, King relates civil disobedience to the Holocaust: “It was ‘illegal’ to aid and comfort a Jew in Hitler’s Germany. But I am sure that, if I had lived in Germany during that time, I would have aided and comforted my Jewish brothers even though it was illegal. If I lived in a communist country today where certain principles dear to the Christian faith are suppressed, I believe I would openly advocate disobeying these anti-religious laws”(King p.23). King cites such an example to bring out the visceral reaction of the audience, given the Holocaust’s widespread negative publicity and condemnation. Thus, King manipulates the reader’s emotions to bring them on board with the idea of civil disobedience. No one would dare question the rectitude of aiding a helpless Jew. King attempts direct the same negative connotation of the Holocaust to segregation in the U.S. to fight injustice in…

    • 1491 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    An injustice upon black community has been here for decades. In Dr. King’s Letter from Birmingham he discuss how upset he was about the criticisms, and wants to address the situation in a mannerable way. Among these criticisms was the efficiency of the white churches. Dr. King wants to do a nonviolent campaign that includes self-purification and negotiation. King was the president of Sothern Christian Leadership Conference (SCLC), in the Sothern state of Atlanta, Georgia he was invited to a non-violent direct action program. Dr. King discussed injustice during his time and they related to the injustice today.…

    • 534 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Furthermore, King states “the white power structure of this city left the negro community with no other alternative” by preaching patience and valuing “order” over “justice,” moderates have ensured the continuation of segregation. King’s disappointed that the white moderate’s do not realize that the black man causes tension, in order to reveal society’s underlying tension by taking direct action against injustice. King warns that moderates will one day feel remorse for having settled with “silence” instead of taking action against the injustice that the black community had…

    • 534 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In “The Ways of Meeting Oppression,” Martin Luther King Jr. primarily uses ethos to promote the practice of non-violent resistance against the struggle of oppression. In this persuasive piece, King uses ethos to appeal to the African Americans' sense of responsibility. By encouraging them to step up instead of passively accepting injustice, he is implying that he trusts they can do it. His argument is based on moral obligations rather than the practicality of the issue. His use of shared values or ethos such as “religion reminds every man that he is his brother's keeper,” enables the argument to remain in the realm of abstractness, which in turn remove the human tension. That makes it easier for him to change the attitudes of people, making…

    • 413 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Kings starts with an idea that there are four basic steps to a nonviolent campaign. “Collection of the facts to determine whether injustices exist, negotiation, self purification, and direct action (King).” He does a great job in this essay pointing out the problems and determining that injustice very much does exist. King states, while in a jail cell, that the very reason he is…

    • 1822 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Birmingham Jail Thesis

    • 643 Words
    • 3 Pages

    From a critical viewpoint, King makes a very persuasive argument using logic and emotions to influence the audience that he is in fact right in taking a non-violent action but more so justified from the basic humanity laws. He denies idea that he is supporting some laws while breaking other by making a distinction between just and unjust laws. He talks about the difference between moral and political and just and unjust laws. For example, Parade law that put him in jail is just in letter but unjust when applied to violate constitution. King also justifies breaking laws by citing historical examples of civil disobedience, such as: the Old Testament, Early Christians in Rome, Socrates, Boston Tea Party, Freedom Fighters against Hitler. He then uses emotions to convince his readers that it is the white moderate that are really at fault, conveying the message that he is a victim of circumstance and society. He uses this to lead into the criticism of his extremism. King is really a moderate between two extremes of black action between doing nothing and becoming violent. He cautions that without his movement, the extreme of hating whites will win out and cause more violence. He then shows that he is indeed a pacifistic by recognition and praise of those whites who have helped his cause. King tries to refute the clergyman’s disapproval of the actions that occurred in Birmingham, he tries to redirects praise to the civil rights protestors, and reconstructs a harmonious…

    • 643 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Dr. King strategically breaks down and characterizes acquiescence as a form of dealing with oppression. Through his analysis, King explains how people surrender to oppression and become accustomed to it as a way of living. Creating an atmosphere where the oppressed person learns to live in with oppression and never fully understands what self respect is. ?Religion reminds everyman that he is his brother?s keeper . . .To accept injustice or segregation passively is to say to the oppressor that his actions are morally right.? (King). Therefore, King believes that this lets the oppressor know that their actions are right influencing the oppressor to continue. Dr. King takes into consideration that this is not the best way to deal with oppression. In fact, he criticizes the people who utilize this method. ?To accept passively and in just system is to cooperate with that system; thereby the oppressed become as evil as the oppressor.?(King) Violence, as a method of dealing with oppression that Dr. King strongly diverges with. King assumes that people who resort to violence also influence hatred at the same time. He explains how violence only creates temporary results. Although at times it may be seen as the best way out but he believes that no one should ever degrade themselves to that level of understanding and standard. According to King, violence only creates problems instead of…

    • 1864 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Oppression is defined as the exercise of authority in a burdensome and unjust manner. Discrimination is defined as actions or practices that result in differential treatment of individuals. Oppression is usually patterns of behavior like sexism which tends to force women into subservient and restricted roles. Cisgenderism, where people do not identify with their assigned gender role, but are forced to choose a role or suffer social consequences. Furthermore, ableism, lookism, ageism and sizeism are all social patterns that do not meet the social ideal of society, so these people are treated different, to an unnecessary degree. Here are examples of discrimination; Segregation, age discrimination, equal pay and compensation, disability discrimination,…

    • 119 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Martin Luther King, Jr. emerged as a pivotal leader in the Civil Rights Movement. Dr. King was an advocate for civil disobedience and peaceful protest. In 1963, following his arrest during a protest in Birmingham, Alabama, Dr. King wrote “Letter from Birmingham Jail” where various sources of oppression were described along with how to combat such oppression. In the letter, Martin Luther King, Jr. explained promises made to the African Community for equality that were never met. As a result of the broken promises, Dr. King called for pressure to be put on the authority figures who instigated such oppression. Dr. King described the pressure as a “direct action” and that the pressure would force negotiation to occur. Negative emotions were in the African American Community. Martin Luther King, Jr. wrote that these emotions could manifest themselves a violence, if not expressed. However, Dr. King warned against acts of violence to achieve the desired end of equality. In the letter, Martin Luther King, Jr. revealed to white leaders the racism faced by African Americans and the difficulties faced by the children of this…

    • 1287 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    I am tired. If mankind is wise then it should be tired as well. My exhaustion derives from the endless conflicts the human race has faced. Often throughout history we have faced conflicts with carrying a big stick and wars. The problem with those approaches is that the little that they attempt to solve is only effective in situations where threats are tangible. In other words, when the enemy has a face. When it comes to inequality based on genders, races, and social constructs, we have nobody to blame. There is no villain that our heroes can eliminate resulting in the end of the problem. Instead invoking social changes takes time and effort faced by much adversity from resistance to change.…

    • 523 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays