Preview

The Success of Louis XVIII as King of France

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1576 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Success of Louis XVIII as King of France
‘’How successful was Louis XVIII as King of France?’’

In April 1814, napoleon abdicated from the throne unconditionally due to the other European monarchs opposing and rising against him. This meant that there was a rising question to who would take over the French phone and rule. The decision of this was to the quadruple alliance (Britain, Russia, Austria, and Prussia), they then made the decisions to restore the Bourbon reign, that last ruled in 1793. The rightful heir to the Bourbon reign was Louis XVIII. When Louis became king in 1814, and started ruling he was faced with many tasks that he had to complete. The tasks that Louis XVIII was faced with included improving the French morque, rehabilitate the bourbon name and to secure their hold on the throne, rule through the charter, prevent the ultra royalists getting out of hand, not to alienate (offend) the liberals, solve the problem of Frances debts, rehabilitate Frances reputations in foreign affairs and to deal with the Napoleonic threat. In order for Louis XVIII to have become a successful he would have to deal with the tasks facing him. If he managed to complete many of these tasks he being a king of France would have been successful. To decide if Louis XVIII was successful a monarch, a successful ruler must be defined. A successful monarch would be someone who would put the interests of their country first, maybe not pleasing everybody all the time, but assuring the countries steadiness in the best way possible. As I mentioned before about when Louis XVIII did come to the throne that he faced a series of problems that he need to solve. Some of the problems where more difficult than some of the other problems, however he handled these problems with ease, and this shows a successful king solving the problems facing his country. On the other hand to what extent was Louis XVIII successful as a king? I am going to talk about the problems that Louis faced and if and how he handed the problems, and also if

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    How successful was Louis XIV in achieving religious unity in France in the years 1661-1715? (24 marks).…

    • 995 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Napoleon Bonaparte was much more qualified to become the leader of France than Louis XVI was. After the death of his father, Louis XVI was given control of France at the young age of fifteen. This was surprising considering as a child Louis XVI showed no signs of leadership, often described as awkward and naïve. “If you abandon me in this great enterprise I shall work alone for the welfare of my peoples…I shall consider myself as their only true representative. None of…

    • 641 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    18. After the rule of Napoleon, Louis XVIII returned France to pre-revolutionary conditions in certain aspects of society and politics. For example, Louis brought back restrictions to religion, Protestants were tormented for their faith. Louis accepted the Code that had been developed by Napoleon but banned divorce, although it had been permitted during the revolution. Louis restored Catholic superiority, this had a trickling effect on the doings of the revolution, restricting rights and restoring inequality.…

    • 1139 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Louis XI, of the Valois line, signified the New Monarchy in France around 1461. Louis XI and the Valois line formed a royal army, overpowered unruly nobles and bandits, and increased the monarch's power over both parliament and the clergy. Louis XI was able to raise taxes without the approval of parliament and eventually parliament asked for him to rule without their input. The…

    • 872 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Louis XIV strove vigorously for supremacy in foreign affairs. He was to use his foreign policy to establish a universal monarchy for himself or alternatively to use it to secure natural frontiers for France thus improving its defenses. He worked successfully to create an absolutist and centralized state. During his reign Louis was involved in four major wars, some of which Louis may be accountable as the provocateur; however, I believe that mainly his motives were purely defensive. The war of Devolution served as a pretext which nettled him part of Flanders, although the Dutch then moved against him with the Triple Alliance. Louis was determined to crush Holland and this began the third of the Dutch wars, which depleted his treasury. Louis proved an incredibly extravagant spender, dispensing huge sums of money to finance the royal court. The following ten years the king limited his policies to diplomacy. Louis continued the nobility's exemption from taxes but forced its member into financial dependence to the crown and the provincial nobles also lost political power. Louis does have a genuine concern for his country and despite his dubious methods he does manage to secure the territories that he wishes to secure. He curtailed local authorities and created specialized ministries. Louis's grandson retained the Spanish throne but the war of Spanish Succession left France in great debt and a weakened military. Louis used the bourgeoisie to build his centralized bureaucracy. He illustrated new administrative methods to make him more in control. Louis's general Colbert worked to improve the French economy. Colbert worked to create a favorable balance of trade and increase France's colonial holdings. He achieved a reputation for his work of improving the state of French manufacturing and bringing the economy back from the brink of bankruptcy. He reduced the national debt through more efficient taxation. His principal taxation devices included the aides, the douanes, the…

    • 407 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    King Louis XIV was a man of strength and courage with many ambitions that he was fully determined to achieve. He dedicated most of his rule taking steps to accomplish the goal of “one king, one law, one faith” for the country of France. By one king he aimed for the ruler to have supreme power over armies, government bureaucracy, and culture. This would eventually lead to the overall influence of the French upon other countries and their kings. By way of one law he aspired for the nobles to no longer rule over separate states but for one government with supreme power. King Louis had a desire for an absolute monarchy. As a result he would not be legally bound by any institutions or other persons in the country. This inclination was not easily met or as successful as he had hoped. Louis XIV sought religious unity between the French people, one faith. To do this he revoked the Edict of Nantes. King Louis XIV did not achieve his entire goal to the extent which he had anticipated but overall he was victorious, leaving a huge impact and influence on the French society and Europe as a whole.…

    • 747 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    An Absolute Monarchy was a new concept to the people of France during the 1600’s. Other forms of government were failing from lack of control, so the people of France turned to an Absolute Monarch, named Louis XIV. The only problem with Louis was that he was self-centered, and did not care a whole lot about governing his kingdom. He was more concerned with making himself looking good, and even went as far to call himself the “Sun God.” As a result, the French common people lived very rough lives, due to the neglect of their king. It was not an easy life for the French people under King Louis XIV’s rule, and it was not made better by his view on governing. This is shown through his lack of genuine care for his people, over taxation, and wars of the time.…

    • 569 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Louis XIV was the epitome of an absolute monarch. Through his endless wars, extreme extravagance, and absolute control over taxes and the economy, he set the example for other European powers. His absolute rule brought about both positives and negatives. By building a large army to defend and expand his borders, he alienated other empires and created enemies. Placing political power and faith in the nobility helped him rule a vast kingdom but displaced him from the common man. His obsession with being a great conqueror expanded France to its largest in history, but nearly bankrupted the country and resulted in losing more territory than he gained. Although Louis XIV brought many improvements to France, as well as western society, his insatiable lust for war and extravagance caused more harm than good to the French Empire.…

    • 750 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Louis XIV was for the flair, fun, and fancy, focusing on the fact that he was the ‘sun’ of France. A patron of the arts, Louis’ policies mainly focused on improving his own social standing and power over his nobility, making sure they were all wrapped around his little finger. He let Colbert and Mazarin do the rest. One of Louis’ main goals was to bear whiteness or be the cause of the destruction of the Hapsburgs who were now declining in power. Louis also made sure that the church of France didn’t mess with his idea of divine right, bullying anyone who stood out against it by throwing them in jail or killing them. Another difference between the two monarchs was the state of the nobility. Louis’ French nobles inherited titles based on their family and their money.…

    • 463 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    As King Louis XVI reined over France during the French Revolution his actions heavily impacted the revolution. When he took over as king in 1774 the country was in severe financial crisis; extravagant spending for the American Revolution left the country on the brink of bankruptcy (History.com Staff 2009). Heavy taxes were imposed which were impossible for the Third Estate (the common people) to pay due to low harvests. King Louis XVI was not popular by the citizens which resulted in outbreaks to overthrow him.…

    • 417 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    William Jefferson Clinton was one of the greatest presidents to govern the United States as opposed to the Bush's. Clinton proved to the world our preeminence by way of control, economic growth, and policies ranging from Israel to social security. The Bush's proved to the world that they won the election. Louis XIV and the Stuart Kings also compare in similar ways. Louis XIV was a sound leader whose foresight and character led to the greatness of France, along with delegating authority to great economic and military leaders. The Stuart Kings possessed no foresight or character, many thought of them as stupid and stubborn, and the way they governed their country was reckless. Louis XIV prospered through absolute control, economic growth, and military reform. Where as, the Stuart Kings failure was due to no real control, economic turmoil, and civil war. The most important factor in the success of Louis XIV and the failure of the Stuart Kings was control.…

    • 1005 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Louis XIV of France is the one of the greatest kings in the world for diverse reasons. The initial reason is that he is the Europe's longest reigning monarch. Accidentally, he became the king of France when he just turned into five. That innocent king was so young to rule the country at that time.…

    • 248 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Stating the fact the if his father had not died, Louis Auguste wouldn't have become the next throne. At least until later on. Louis Auguste was ill prepared for the throne, considering he was very young. When he inherited the throne as Louis XVI, France was in a massive debt. He was immature, lacked self-confidence and also lacked sufficient strength of character and decisiveness. Due to those terms, he was a weak king. If his father was still the king, France wouldn't be as burdened with debts and under heavy taxation as to how it was during Louis Auguste being the king. Louis XIV had a brilliant minister of finance, named Jean-Baptiste Colbert, who drastically reduced the debt of France and helped make it the wealthiest country in Europe.…

    • 253 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Both Louis XVI and Nicholas II were absolute rulers. Neither of them wanted to be king. Louis simply wanted a quiet life where he could be tucked in and eat…

    • 721 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    * Louis XVI ruled as King of France and Navarre from 1774 until 1791, and then as King of the French from 1791 to 1792.…

    • 15658 Words
    • 63 Pages
    Good Essays