Preview

The Stanford Prison Experiment: Does Authority Change Human Behavior?

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
672 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Stanford Prison Experiment: Does Authority Change Human Behavior?
Human being, the most civilized creature in the plant of earth, believed that their actions are based on their own moral and ethical values. However, sometime those values were not strong and can easily be affected by external factor which led to an “different” behavior. These factor can be culture, social norms, ethics of a society, religious inclination, coercion, and human influence by authority. The milgram experiment showed that our behaviors can be drastically impacted by higher-level authority factor. Several test subjects were given the authority to shock a subject when answering a question incorrectly, under the supervision of a “professional doctor”. Over time, the voltage of the shock increased as the subjects continued to answer questions incorrectly. At one point, the subject complains that the shock is too strong and that he has heart problems. At that time, the people in charge were affected by the test subjects’ …show more content…
In the dramatic simulation of this experiment the conductor posted some question “what happens when you put good people in an evil place?” Does humanity win over evil, or does evil triumph? The result of the experiment answer does questions very well, and it was proven that most of the individual participating and acting as authority were becoming sadistic and the prisoners became depressed and showed signs of extreme stress. A controlled experiment meant to last two weeks had to be stop by the sixth day because of the way that the guards and prisoners were acting, and these participants were college students with no background of violence or psychological problems, but just by impersonating their role in the experiment their behavior changed and adapted. The overall results of the experiment show that external situations are more powerful than internal characteristics of the individual, so we can say that circumstances shape our

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    When people are given little to no direction or training, and are faced with dealing with people they may perceive as a threat to their own safety and the well-being of others, they have a propensity to overstep what most would consider reasonable behavior. The “guards” in the experiment were put into a position of authority and took the steps they deemed necessary to maintain order. In spite of the fact that they knew it was an experiment, they were immersed in the situation and played the role given them. The “prisoners” played their part and were so wholly immersed in the role and the environment that their entire perspective of reality was altered. They began to believe they were helpless and unable to help themselves out of the situation they found themselves. They had become powerless to change the situation, in spite of the fact that it was just an…

    • 1846 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Can good, moral, and virtuous people be pushed to do bad things? This article seeks to compare an experiment done in 1971 to a real life military situation during wartime. The article also tries to link the experiment to another horrible act done by someone suffering from various mental illnesses with extremely mixed results. Is there a correlation between these three events as far as the mental states of the participants?…

    • 688 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Have you ever noticed that certain people act and behave differently when they are with crowds versus when they are alone? Being in a large crowd can really impact individual to act in a certain way that they seem to fit in with the group and sometimes do things more anonymous as it is in a large crowd. Both Zimbardo and Le Bon believe that bystanders are less responsible and more likely to commit violence than when people are alone. Philip Zimbardo is a psychologist and a professor at Stanford University; he researches the cause of evil in people by doing a Stanford prison experiment. Zimbardo states about how evil can cause good people easily by the peers that they are surrounded by and the culture and traditional way changes can affect people…

    • 1535 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The idea of government has been around for centuries. It has changed and expanded so much over the years that certain governments have morphed into a more violent institution, in some cases. Because governments have changed so much over the years, certain governments have slowly evolved to become extreme, and may be considered seriously dangerous in the future.…

    • 474 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    For example, within hours of beginning of this experiment, guards started harassing prisoners and behaved in a brutal manner, seems like they were enjoying it. Another example, the prisoners were taunted with insults and tortured by giving different tasks such as cleaning toilets with bare hands, etc. The participants felts involved and committed. In addition, this experiment was attempted to isolate the source of conflicts between prisoners and guards in terms of role, power and individual behavior. For example, guards were firmly in control and prisoners were completely dependent on them.…

    • 496 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    This study is considered a classic when with regards to prison psychology. According to the American Psychological Association (2004) “Its messages have been carried in many textbooks in the social sciences, in classroom lectures across many nations, and in popular media renditions. Its web site has gotten over 15 million unique page views in the past four years, and more than a million a week in the weeks following the expose of the abuse of Iraqi prisoners by American Military Police army reservists in Abu Ghraib Prison”. Zimbardo’s research has come to be known as one of the classical example of how circumstantial power has the ability to influence individuals in multiple domains. This experiment is historically one of the prime examples of how even the most “good” person when placed under specific situations can in turn transform into “evil”. It shows just how easily individuality can be stripped away and in turn how the environment can define and dictate ones…

    • 1783 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Even "good" people can be beaten down by conditions, such as those simulated in the experiment, to a point where they are no longer sure of their own identity. If anything, this experiment should have taught players in the criminal justice system just how desperately prison reform is needed. Sadly, conditions such as these continue to persist and have even been the cause of recent controversy as seen in the instances of Abu Ghrab and Guantanamo Bay prisons.…

    • 641 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Experiments have been done for many more years than humans can count on the two hands in which they possess. Two experiments, in particular, were written, “The Stanford Prison Experiment” by Philip G. Zimbardo and “The Perils of Obedience” by Stanley Milgram. These experiments can be controversial for many different reasons, but neither of these experiments were completed under conditions of normality. The information collected in these experiments isn’t exactly based off of real life situations, it becomes difficult not to question the relevance of these experiments.…

    • 743 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Stanford Prison Experiment conducted by Philip Zimbardo was aimed at investigating how an individual’s environment would affect their behavior. To simplify, Zimbardo wanted to know if a bad environment would negatively impact an individual or if their inner “goodness” would allow for them to overcome behaviors conducive to a bad environment. The results of the experiment were quite shocking; it was found that the environment ultimately affected how individuals behave--the participants readily conformed to the roles they were expected to play.…

    • 480 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Professor Philip Zimbardo, leader of the Stanford prison experiment considered three questions before initiating one of the most significant experiments to human phycology. He asked; ‘What happens when you put good people in an evil place? Does the situation outside of you come to control your behaviour? Or do the things inside you such as your attitudes, your values and your morality etc. allow you to rise above a negative environment?…

    • 657 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Stanford Prison Experiment was a very unique and brutal experiment. In 1973 the professor Philip G. Zimbardo set out to study how normal subjects such as college aged men would react as “prisoners” and “guards” in a mock prison setting. Stanford set up what they called a “mock prison” in the basement of Stanford University’s psychology building. During the experiment there were ten prisoners and eleven guards. The prisoners were stripped of their uniqueness by being dressed in matching smocks and nylon caps. Prisoners were also only referred to by their ID number. The guards in the experiment were also “deindividualized” as they were to wear khaki uniforms and silver reflector sunglasses. Guards had billy clubs, whistles, handcuffs and…

    • 413 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Fake prisoners and fake guards in a spurious jail is a peculiar way to determine roles in society. Philip G. Zimbardo was the mastermind of the Stanford Prison Experiment, which was a psychological experiment that determined the roles of members in a society that became a fiasco (“Philip G. Zimbardo” 1). The experiment left emotional and mental scars on mock-prisoner lives. The Stanford Prison Experiment (SPE) illustrates the way a person changes when a label and power is all of a sudden given to hoax guards in order to control fraud prisoners.…

    • 1435 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The first two lectures of MGMT2120 were just like a series of shocks that have totally renewed my concept about authority and its effect on human. People are taught to respect authority since we are young. We know we have to obey our parents in family, obey our teachers in schools and obey the law in the society. This ethic constitutes a stable and systemic society and that is why I believe authority is a necessary element for the prosperity of a society. However, I have never expected that authority has such thorough effect on human that it even overwhelms people’s fundamental moral standards until I watched the Milgram experiment during the first lecture.…

    • 538 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    "The Stanford Prison Experiment was a landmark psychological study of the human response to captivity, in particular, to the real world circumstances of prison life." What was a psychological study? More as, what was the Stanford Prison Experiment? As soon as those words popped up on my screen, the very next thing I did was Google it. The very first things that appeared was a deep explanation of exactly what it was; "an attempt to investigate the psychological effects of power between prisoners and gaurds." Although it was an unethical experiment, it was an interesting one, especially to me. The very next day, I found enough things about it that I could write a book about it. I also ended up watching the documentary that went with it. Everything…

    • 256 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Courtesy

    • 575 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Moral norms and ethical values from the basis of the teachings of all religions of the world. It would be right to say that only by following these norms and values the foundations of modern civilization and culture were laid. These are the principles that distinguish man from animal. Man the crown of all the creatures of God, is endowd with moral sense that enabke him to establish amiable and pleasant relations with his fellowmen based on mutual respect. He has the capability to differebtiate betweeb good and evil. Courtesy,infact, is the practical expression of this capability.…

    • 575 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays