Preview

The Rule Of Law: The Petition Of Right Of 1628

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2581 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Rule Of Law: The Petition Of Right Of 1628
The rule of law is a key constitutional principle that is the basis of legal justice. In explaining the legitimacy of the law, it stands as the cornerstone principle of the UK constitution. Given the fact that the UK does not have a codified constitution that establishes “the arrangements by which it is to be governed, nor does it have a set of core values by which the state is to be run” it has been described as “an integrated expression of historical experience conferring a unified meaning on political existence” , thus causing the rule of law to exist to a greater or a lesser extent, and to consequently evolve over centuries. Though several other constitutional principles, such as the doctrine of parliamentary supremacy and the principle …show more content…
However, there is much evidence in history that suggest that even after having been signed by King John in 1215, its principles were not unswervingly accepted and applied. The Petition of Right of 1628 serves as an illustration of this, as, being established four decades after Magna Carta, it reiterated that “no freeman shall be taken, or imprisoned, or disseized” of freehold or liberties but “by the lawful judgement of his peers” or “by the law of the land” . Thus, if the rule of law had been strictly applied, the Petition of Right of 1628 would hardly have been necessary. Furthermore, the Petition of Right also aimed at allowing the right of habeas corpus, introduced through the Magna Carta, to mature, as it provided that no individual could be punished or detained except by way of law. Darnel’s case in 1627 stands as a landmark case in English history due to its contribution to the enactment of the Petition of Right, thus its role in developing the upholding of the rule of law, and protection of citizens against arbitrary use of power. In this case, Thomas Darnel, John Corbet, Walter Earl, John Heveningham, and Edmund Hampden petitioned King's Bench for a writ of habeas corpus to be set free after having arbitrarily …show more content…
More recently, the enactment of the Constitutional Reform Act 2005, and the consequent removal of the Lord Chancellor from the House of Lords along with the creation of the supreme court, clearly separated the judiciary from the executive and legislature, thus supporting the principle of separation of powers and ensuring that the law is enforced impartially by judges who are independent of all authority, but that of the rule of law . The rule of law clearly has not always been the bedrock principle of the UK constitution but it has been gradually embedded into the constitution through history by means of statutory recognition and case law.

Parliamentary sovereignty is another principle underlying the UK Constitution, which denotes that the Westminster Parliament has the legal authority to pass, amend, or repeal any law it wishes; hence appearing as a

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The law is an intricate system of principles that regulate the activity of citizens and enforce sanctions through imposition. This order was developed through a legal evolution that many individuals fail to recognize due to disinterest in history. In order to comprehend the current state of law, one must refer to the past as it enables individuals to appropriately analyze the future. The Magna Carta and The Quebec Act are key developments that played a vital role in the just formation of law in modern society.…

    • 435 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    The historical evolution of habeas corpus born from the Magna Carta, known as the English Bill of Rights began in England in the early 1200s. Under force from English barons, King John of England placed his signature on the Magna Carta in 1215, in which comprised of a list of human rights and civil liberties. It asserted that the King needed consent from his legislative body to impose taxes upon its citizens. Halliday (2011) notes that habeas corpus serves as a writ and a scrabble parchment that a judge ordered a jailer to bring forth a named prisoner to court to face said written charges. This very important document additionally established that trial and due process of law must occur previous to confiscating property or freedom from any free man who resided in England. Instead of King John stepping down from power he agreed to place…

    • 1857 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Magna Carta was a written document which gave nobles the respect of their rights by King John. This document would list rights that the King could not ignore. One of the most important written principles in the document stated that even the King must obey the law. This piece was a brand new idea in 1215 which would later become one of the basic principles of English government. Most importantly, it shows that the King must obey the law which meant he couldn’t disobey something that he normally would, like collecting high taxes or waging to many wars. Another important piece to the document states that the king could not imprison free men without it being judged lawful by their peers. This established a principle that would later be a fair…

    • 166 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Whether there is a constitution in the United Kingdom has been a controversial topic. The term ‘constitution’ itself is open to different interpretations. Some prescriptive authors argue that a constitution must satisfy a set of specific characteristics – for instance that it must be entrenched and superior to other laws, which is attributed to the people. Others consider that constitutions are codes of norms which aspire to regulate the allocation of powers, functions, and duties among the various agencies and officers of government, and to define the relationship between these and the public. While some believed that a constitution is as simple as ‘no more and no less than what happens. Everything that happens is constitutional. And if nothing happened that would be constitutional also.’…

    • 1266 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Through its long history the Magna Carta was an important stepping stone in the development of the theory of limited government. Although at the time in which the Magna Carta was written, it did not apply to many of the people. And more so less today. Yet from the Magna Carta it is believed that the important principles of jury by trial were derived. Other principles such as the right to a fair trial and no taxation without representation were…

    • 668 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Magna Carta was written in 1215. It was the first document to challenge the authority of the king, subjecting him to the rule of the law and protecting nobles from feudal abuse. When Englishmen went to the colonies they were given charters that guaranteed them and their heirs would “have and enjoy all liberties and immunities of free and natural subjects.” The document clearly stated that no free man could be prosecuted by any means other than the law of the land. The Magna Carta’s fundamental rights and principles included due process of law and trial by jury. Taking a cue from the document more than five centuries later, American revolutionaries incorporated many of the Magna Carta's basic ideas into another important piece of parchment – the U.S. Constitution.…

    • 1552 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The phrase “rule of law” is important because laws reflect the kind of society that people want to live in.…

    • 540 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    peers or the law of the land." (Blackstone, Sir William; 18th Century). Habeas corpus is part of our civil…

    • 1056 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Perhaps the underlying theme of those parts of Magna Carta which is most relevant to this discussion can be summarized as follows: prosecution and imprisonment based upon the arbitrary whim of the sovereign was to be ended, and would now take place only according to law. While English history after the signing in 1215 is full of examples where this principle was clearly not followed, nonetheless, a number of the clauses recognized fundamental protections which went some distance towards ending arbitrariness. There remained centuries of struggle – both armed and otherwise – to lead us to where we stand today, but in 1215 this general theme found voice in a number of the terms of the Great…

    • 125 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The rule of law is enshrined in Magna Carta which was issued in 1215 by King John of England to appease land barons. The rule of law asserts that all persons must comply with laws of the nation irrespective of king or any other privileged person. Although Magna Carta is silent about king’s immunity, the document does impose limit on king’s power. The barons has the authority to invoke the provisions of Chapter 61 of the Magna Carta’s original version which states that the king should not ignore or violate the traditions, customs or laws and could not take any arbitrary actions against his subjects.1 Magna Carta provides for rule of law, ensures fairness of laws, contains commitment to due process of law and gives respect for economic rights.…

    • 635 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The original purpose of habeas corpus "was to bring people into court rather than out of imprisonment" and by the year 1230, the writ 's utility for that purpose was a well-known aspect of English common law. Known as "the Great Writ," its codification into English law came by way of Parliament in the Habeas Corpus Act of 1641, created in response to the King of England 's actions during what is now referred to as Darnell 's Case. In Darnell, five English noblemen were thrown "into the castle 's dungeon deep" for failure to support their country 's dual wars against France and Spain. The men filed suit, requesting the King provide an explanation as to their imprisonment. King Charles refused, on review; the court upheld the monarchy 's steadfast silence, stating that the law did not require the King to provide any justification for their detention. The public outcry against this decision was deafening, prompting Parliamentary action the following year. Parliament expanded habeas rights several years later with the Habeas Corpus Act of 1679, additionally requiring "charges to be brought within a specific time period for anyone detained for criminal acts." By 1765, habeas corpus was firmly imbedded within the foundation of English law, as noted by William Blackstone, who described the Great Writ as "a second magna carta, a stable bulwark of our liberties." This fundamental English right successfully traversed the Atlantic Ocean when our founders…

    • 1936 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The historical evolution of Habeas Corpus born from the Magna Carta, known as the English bill of Rights began in England in the early 1200’s. Under power from English barons, King John of England placed his signature on the Magna Carta in 1215, in which comprised of a list of human rights and civil liberties. It asserted that the King needed consent from his legislative body to impose taxes upon its citizens. (Halliday 2011) notes that habeas corpus serves as a right and a…

    • 1522 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Habeas Corpus History

    • 1938 Words
    • 8 Pages

    The Habeas Corpus’ history is ancient. Predominately of Anglo-Saxon common law origin, it precedes the Magna Carta of 1215. The practice surrounding the writ has evolved, Habeas Corpus from its earliest forms have been compelled to grant an appearance…

    • 1938 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Parliamentary Sovereignty

    • 659 Words
    • 3 Pages

    * UK powers of the government - while dependent on the electoral mandate – is unconstrained by any fundamental document and subject to Parliament’s approval.…

    • 659 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Justice is the linchpin of a society. Without a system of laws that reflect it, a nation’s government will lose its credibility among its governed.…

    • 1807 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays