Preview

The Role of Physical Attraction and Social Factors in Human Relationships.

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
12031 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Role of Physical Attraction and Social Factors in Human Relationships.
Title

The Role of Physical Attraction and Social Factors in Human Relationships.

Gail Drew (2003)

Department of Human and Health Sciences, University of Huddersfield, Queensgate, Huddersfield HD1 3DH.

Abstract

Objectives

The present study was partly based on previous research (Singh, 1993; 1994; Fallon and Rozin, 1985; Goodwin, 1990; Smith et al, 1990) to investigate the role of female body physical attractiveness and social factors between males and females in human relationships. The evolutionary theory and the social learning theory provide the basis of investigation. Four hypotheses were investigated, regarding female body shapes concerning their attractiveness. Three hypotheses were investigated in relation to personality factors, physical attributes and financial resources.
Design
The present study used a self-report questionnaire design. There were three independent variables. The first independent variable consisted of female body shapes in the form of line drawings with four levels varying from (very slim to heavy). The second variable consisted of line drawings varying in female body shapes (underweight to overweight) with twelve levels in the waist-to-hip ratio (WHR) varying from 0.7 WHR (underweight) to 0.10 WHR (overweight). The third independent variable consisted of eighteen social factors. A repeated measures design was employed for all conditions. A number of one-factor repeated measures ANOVA’s and a number of independent t-tests were employed for the results analysis.
Method
57 couples took part in the present study (57 males and 57 females). The length of relationships ranged from 2 weeks to 26 years. The sex and length of relationship was recorded. The participant’s age, background, profession, and religion were not recorded. Participants were gathered using a stratified sample. Their tasks were to rate female body



References: ψ Archer, J (1996) Sex differences in Social behaviour: Are the Social role theory and evolutionary explanations compatible? American Psychologist, 51, pp. 909-917. ψ Barber, N. (1998) Secular changes in standards of bodily attractiveness in American women: Different masculine and feminine ideals. The Journal of Psychology, 132, pp 87-94. ψ Baron, R. A., and Byrne (2000) Social Psychology (9th ed). Nova York. Allyn and Bacon. ψ Buss, D, M (1994) The evolution of desire strategies of human mating. New York. ψ Buss, D, M (1999) Evolutionary Psychology: The new science of the mind. Nova York. Allyn and Bacon. ψ Buss, D, M and Barnes, M., F (1986) Preferences in human mate selection. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, pp. 559-570. ψ Buss, D, M., & Schmitt. D. M (1993) sexual strategies theory: An evolutionary perspective on human mating, Psychology review, 100, pp. 204-232. ψ Chodorow, N. (1978) The reproduction of mothering. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press. ψ Cohn, L D. & Adler, N, E. (1992) Female and Male perceptions of ideal body shapes. Psychology of Women’s Quartley, 16, pp. 69-79. ψ Cunningham, M. R., Barbee, A. P., & Pike, C. L. (1990) What do women what? Facial metric assessment of multiple motives in the perception of male physical activeness. Journal of personality and social psychology, 59, pp 61-72. ψ Coolican, H. (1999) (3rd Eds) Research methods and statistics in psychology. London. Hodder and Stoughton. ψ Dawin, C (1871) The descent of man and selection in relation to sex. London. Murray. ψ Demarest, J., & Allen, R. (2000) Body image: Gender, ethnic, and age differences. Journal of Social Psychology, 140, pp 465-472. ψ Fallon and Rozin (1985) Sex differences in perception of desirable body shape. Journal of abnormal Psychology, 94, pp 102-105. ψ Eagly, A. (1987) Sex differences in Social behaviour: A Social role interpretation. Hillsdale, HJ: Erlbaum. ψ Feingold, A. (1990) Gender differences in effects of physical on romantic attraction, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, pp 981-993. ψ Furnham, A., Tan, T., & McManus, C. (1997) Waist to hip ratio and preferences for the body shape: a replication and extension. Personality and Individual Differences, 22, pp 539-549. ψ Fouts, G., & Burggraf, K (1999) Television situation comedies: Female body images and verbal reinforcements. Sex roles, 40, pp. 473-481. ψ Goodwin, R. (1990) Sex differences among partner preferences: Are the sexes really very similar? Sex Roles, 23, pp. 501-513. ψ Graziano, W. G (1993) Social influences, sex differences, and judgements of beauty. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, pp 522-531. ψ Grogan, S (1998) Body Image, understanding body dissatisfaction in men. Women and children. London. Routledge. ψ Hamida, S. B., Mineka, S., & Bailey, J. M (1998) Sex differences in perceived controllability of mate value: an evolutionary perspective. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, pp. 953-966. ψ Henss, R. (1995) Waist-to-hip ratio and attractiveness. Replication and extension. Personality and individual differences, 19, pp 479-488. ψ Henss, R. (2000) Waist-to-hip ratio and female attractiveness. Evidence from photographic stimuli and methodological considerations. Personality and Individual Differences, 28, pp. 501-513. ψ Herz, R. S., & Inzlicht, M (2000) Sex differences in response to physical and social factors involved in human mate selection. The importance of smell for women. Evolution and Human behaviour, 23, pp. 359-364. ψ Hyde, J. S. (1990) Meta-analysis and the psychology of gender differences. Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 16, pp. 55-73. ψ Kenrick, D. T., and Trost, M. R (1993) The evolutionary perspective. Cited in Beall A. E., and Sternberg. R.J (eds), The psychology of gender (pp. 148-172). New York & London: Guilford Press. ψ Margolin, L and White, L (1987) The Continuing Role of Physical Attractiveness in Marriage. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 49, pp. 21-27. ψ Marlowe, F., & Wetsman, A. (2001) Preferred waist-to-hip ratio and ecology. Personality and individual differences, 30, pp 481-489. ψ Muth, J.L., Cash, T.F. (1997). Body image attitudes: what difference does gender make? Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 27, pp 1438-1452. ψ Pfeiffer, E., and Davis, G. C., (1972) Determinants of sexual behaviour in middle and old age. Cited in Margolin, L and White, L (1987) The Continuing Role of Physical Attractiveness in Marriage. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 49, pp. 21-27. ψ Pfeiffer, E., Verwoerdt, A., and Davis, G. C., (1972) Sexual Behaviour in Middle Life. Cited in Margolin, L and White, L (1987) The Continuing Role of Physical Attractiveness in Marriage. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 49, pp. 21-27. ψ Pfeiffer, E., Verwoerdt, A., and Wang, H. S (1968) Sexual Behaviour in Aged men and Women. Cited in Margolin, L and White, L (1987) The Continuing Role of Physical Attractiveness in Marriage. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 49, pp. 21-27. ψ Robson, C. (1991) Real world research. Oxford: Blackwell. ψ Rubin, L. B (1983). Intimate strangers: Men and women together. New York: Harper and Row. ψ Silberstein, L. R., Striegel-Moore, R. H., Timko, C. & Rodin, J. (1988). Behavioural and psychological implications of body dissatisfaction: Do men and women differ? Sex Roles, 19, pp. 219-232. ψ Singh, D. (1993) Adaptive significance of female physical attractiveness: Role of waist-to-hip ratio. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, pp 293-307. ψ Singh, D. (1994) Ideal female body shapes: Role of weight and waist-to-hip ratio. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 16, pp 285-288. ψ Singh, D., & Young, R. K (1995) Body weight, waist-to-hip ratio, breast and hips: role in judgements of female attractiveness and desirability. Ethology and Sociobiology, 16, pp. 483-507. ψ Smith, J. B., Waldolf. V., & Trembath. D. L. (1990). “Single white male looking for thin, very attractive female…” Sex roles, 23, pp. 675-685. ψ Spence, J., Deaux, K., and Helmreich, R. L. (1985) Sex roles in contemporary American Society. Cited in Lindsay, G and Aronson E. (Eds), Handbook of Social Psychology (Vol.2) (pp. 149-178). New York. Random House. ψ Stice, E., Schupak-Neuberg, E., Shaw. H. E., & Stein, R. L (1994) Relation of Media exposure to eating disorder symptomatology: An examination of mediating mechanisms. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 103 (3), pp. 836-840. ψ Townsend, J.M. (1990) Effects of potential partners’ costume and physical attractiveness on sexuality and partner selection. Journal of Psychology, 124, pp 371-389. ψ Townsend, J.M. (1993) Sexuality and partner selection: Sex differences among college students. Ethology and Sociobiology, 14, pp. 305 - 330. ψ Travis, C. (1992) The mismeasure of women. New York: Simon and Schuster. ψ Yu, D. W., & Shepard, G. H. Jr (1998). Is beauty in the eye of the beholder? Nature, 396, pp 321-322.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Buss aimed to investigate if evolutionary explanations for sex differences in human mate preferences are found in varying cultures such as locations, ethnicity and religion. It was predicted that women preferred men who are ambitious, hardworking and financially well-off. Men preferred women who are young, attractive and chaste.…

    • 1979 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Sexual selection can be used to explain certain characteristics or behaviours which increase an individual’s reproductive success. These characteristics may get exaggerated over evolutionary time. In humans, these characteristics may include good physical and mental health, as well as physical features such as good looks etc. these characteristics are attractive because they show an ability to reproduce and pass on these genes to offspring. There are two types of sexual selection, intrasexual and intersexual. Intrasexual selection is the evolution of characteristics that enable an individual to compete with their rivals whereas intersexual selection is the evolution of characteristics that are attractive to a mate. An example of this would be a peacock’s tail. The peacock with the ‘best’ tail (longest and brightest etc.) is considered to be more attractive to the peahen and therefore he is more likely to reproduce and pass on his genes to the next generation. Buss, 1989, found evidence to support this. Over 10000 participants across 37 different cultures took part in his study on differences in intersexual selection. Questionnaires were given to the participants, asking about preferences for variables such as marriage, age differences, characteristics etc. He found that women valued qualities such as ambition and industriousness in men – qualities showing their financial potential. He also found that men valued youth and physical attractiveness more highly than women. This suggests that males look for qualities associated with fertility in line with evolutionary predictions. He concluded that women have evolved to select mates who can provide resources for themselves and their offspring. Buss’ study had over 10000 participants and therefore has credibility, however the participants may have not given a truthful answer and instead given one they thought would appear more…

    • 825 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Evolutionary psychologists explain male-female differences in courtship and sexuality by stating that “the sexes have evolved to differ profoundly in aggressiveness, dominance, and sexual strategies.” Wade and Travis. (2008). Psychology, Ninth Edition. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Prentice Hall Publishing. Evolutionary psychologists have brought forth the idea that males and females need to perform in a way that will allow them to pass on their genes.…

    • 528 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    For years psychologist looked for what specifically goes into the mating process between a male and female. Studies by Freud and Jung proposed that people seek mates with the characteristics of those that belong to their parents of the opposite sex. The physiologist Winch proposed a theory that stated people look for mates who have traits that they substantially lack. In this those searching for a mate are looking for a form of completion within themselves. Others have stated that individuals are more likely to mate with individuals who have a commonality among attributes shared by the seeker. What do all these theories have in common? These theories share the belief that choices are either made consciously and/ or unconsciously. These situations are usually developed to enhance those who are doing the seeking. Yet these theories lack a lot of common knowledge. The theories stated above are very broad in what they believe the matting process is due to. This paper will discuss the different ways and problems both males and females are confronted with as they look for others to mate with. One main basis of mating that is not stated is sexual motivation.…

    • 2105 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Sociobiologists believe human behavior has developed through evolution in the same manner that physical characteristics have. They describes how psycho-sexual gender differences have evolved by using a Sociobiological method of explanation. They say that these gender differences are based on two indisputable biological facts. First, humans as biological beings have a propensity for maximizing their reproductive success in order to ensure that their genes will be passed on and they will "survive" through their offspring. Second, men have a much greater potential capacity for reproducing than women because of women's long gestation and lactation periods. They argue that because of these two facts, men are predisposed towards polygyny and multiple mates and women naturally hunt for the best possible mate. They extrapolate from this to say that men are naturally: more promiscuous than women, more aroused by the sex organs of the opposite sex than women, more sexually driven than women. And finally they argue from the Sociobiological perspective that the most successful behaviors "become based in our genes, and that certain genetic configurations become selected because they result in behaviors that are adaptive for survival." (Bleier) I do not believe that psycho-sexual gender differences are merely determined by biology, and I intend to provide evidence supporting my thesis in this first section of my paper.…

    • 2447 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Like other similar research, this study will determine that it is the similarities not the differences that bring people together when they are selecting their mates. This study explores this concept based strictly on physical attractiveness levels. Participants will be asked to rate each member of a couple separately and then the rating will be compared. If the expected result is achieved, each individual will have a rating similar to that of their mate. It was concluded that people select mates that have a similar physical attractiveness level to their own.…

    • 1506 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Evolutionary theory states that body symmetry and symmetrical faces are desired characteristics, Cartwright (2000) found that women who have symmetrical breasts are more fertile than those with asymmetrical breasts. This supports the idea that body symmetry indicates reproductive fitness which leads to evolved characteristics, and allows women to have high self-esteem. Furthermore, other than symmetrical body and face structures males use physical attractiveness to judge how fit a female is to reproduce. Men look of more attractive females however females look for men who can provide good state of wealth. This is due to men only looking for the characteristics of reproduction and successive care of children from females. Although men and women both look into different characteristic, females are choosier since they have a larger investment and therefore more to lose. However, the study cannot be supported since a disadvantage of this study is that female may alter the appearance in order to seem young and fertile, while men may also lie and exaggerate on the amount of…

    • 653 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    *Critically evaluate Evolutionary Psychology theory as an explanation for sex differences in sexual j*ealousy. Discuss evidence for and against this explanation The subsequent part of this essay will now focus on the evidence against the theory of Evolutionary Psychology and will look at arguments in contradiction of this. The topic this essay will focus on in the argument against Darwin’s evolutionary psychology theory as an explanation for sex differences within sexual jealousy is Social Psychology. “The social structural theory states that the critical cause of sex differences is social structure. Because men and women tend to have different social roles, they become psychologically different to adjust to their social roles” (Eagly & Wood,…

    • 305 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Prompt: It is suspected that the female orgasm provides support for the evolutionary history of short-term mating. Is short-term mating a way for females to narrow down the pool of potential reproductive candidates? Provide research in support of this theory. Then explain how female orgasm helps create better genetic reproduction.…

    • 688 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Paperessay

    • 818 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In today’s generation mating is very popular to teenager. Teenagers want to experiment and experience how it feels like to mate with some one they really love or care about. But how does mating really works? Do individual has to be attracted to the opposite sex, or the sensation just has to be present. Modern humans come into their mating strategies through the success of their ancestor. This article provides an example of the complexities of each strategies such as: long-term strategies, short-term strategies, mate poaching, extra pair mating, and mate guarding. The article presents an evidence and support these hypothesis using data, graphs, and an examples.…

    • 818 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    14. What is generally the most important factor in the evolution of mating systems and why does this “make sense’?…

    • 1524 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Evolutionary Psychology

    • 399 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Evolutionary psychologists view human behavior and psychological traits as a result of evolutionary adaptation in response to reproductive needs – much like the concept of natural selection applied to reproduction, or sexual selection. Drawing from this perspective, evolutionary psychologists and professionals seek to explain the differences between male and female dating and mating rituals and sexual attitudes and how they have evolved throughout the centuries. For example, researchers employ the evolutionary perspective to discuss the differences in male and female promiscuity, aggressiveness, dominance, dating patterns, and the development of sexual attitudes – differences which seem to become less apparent in modern times than the more traditional sexual values expressed throughout history.…

    • 399 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Human Mate Preferences

    • 1224 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Abstract. The study explored how differences in gender affect the partner preferences. Results were obtained through a questionnaire of school-aged individuals. The researchers expected that the results to show a difference in preferences of the characteristics of a partner depending on gender which is linked to the ideas of sex differences in parental investment and sexual selection. The results were consistent with the hypothesis, demonstrating evident difference in partner choice between males’ and females’.…

    • 1224 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    3. Parker, G. A. 1983. Mate Quality and Mating Decisions. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.…

    • 1508 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Exposure to the “ideal” body images has been found to lower women's satisfaction with their own attractiveness. (1)…

    • 729 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays