Preview

The Pros And Cons Of Torturing Children

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1670 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Pros And Cons Of Torturing Children
To decide what's right and wrong is always controversial especially when you are facing a situation where universal moral rules have to be broken. That's the scenario we are are presented with where the master mind of a terrorist attack who is call KSM has been captured by the CIA. He posses valuable information that could prevent another terrorist attack. However, he is not cooperating even under coercive interrogation methods. As a result, one of the agents suggests torturing his two kids who are under their custody. As unethical as torturing kids is this was one of their only options in order to try to make KSM talk. By doing this they would hope to save countless lives by preventing any future attacks. In order to make such a difficult …show more content…
The formula of humanity would also denied permission to torture. However this two ideologies have very different reasons for disagreeing. While the principle of utility focuses in a more consequentialist approach the formula of humanity looks more into a humanitarian reasoning. They look at the action in two very distinct perspectives, even though they both agree that torturing the kids is not the right solution. Kant's formula of humanity states, “act in such a way that you treat humanity, wether in your own person or in the person of another, always at the same time as an end and never simply as a means”(429). This refers to the idea that one must never use someone as a mean because of their humanity. By humanity Kant refers to the rational nature or the power of choice not as a human race. Kant explains that this is due to the unconditional value humans posses, a person's value is found in themselves not in any other means. Kant insists that “every rational being, exists as an end in himself and not merely as a means to be arbitrarily used by this or that will” (428). Humanity has an absolute value that doesn't depend from some aim. According to Kant there is only one exception to this rule, which states that you can only use a person as a mean if you have their consent. Certainly we would not have the consent of the children to torture them hence this exception does not apply to our case. For this reasons the formula of humanity would not consider torture the children acceptable. The children are human beings who deserve respect to their rational nature and their absolute

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    The debate over whether or not capital punishment should be used has gone on for thousands of years. Although the method of capital punishment has changed the idea of it has not. Capital punishment will always have its disadvantages and its advantages. There has always been an intense debate among the people regarding the constitutionality of capital punishment. In my opinion, capital punishment should only be used in harsh cases that the convicted person is proven guilty in.…

    • 78 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    This in no way is a good for mankind in general. Torturing another being of your kind is an absolute anarchy! The right versus right dilemma in this case is truth versus loyalty. The soldiers involved in the torturing may not all want to be involved in the acts, and possibly got the information from the suspect and wants to report it. However, if majority of the troops wanted to do torturing acts, high ranking officers wanted to, would you say no? Peer pressure has been the most influential stimulant for centuries. Battling alongside the group of men and women for months, sometimes for years, loyalty and bonds are formed. This is an ethical dilemma that I find really boggling. The resolution I would use in this dilemma would be the Care-based model. "Do onto others, as you would want done to you" is a saying parents have been using for years, could they be more true? If they were in another country and were captured, I highly doubt they'd give up information and secrets about military or government plans. If that occurred, he would be looked upon as a traitor. The government needs to stick to human rights principles and stick by the book in imprisonment…

    • 1313 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    As previously mentioned, if the punishment is not harsh enough the result is repeated offense. If a criminal relishes in committing a crime and the court system does not properly punish them for it, then they actually have no reason not to repeat the crime over again. The National Institute of Justice, part of the U.S department of Justice, studied how likely criminals are to relapse after being released, claiming that “Within five years of release, about three-quarters (76.6 percent) of released prisoners were rearrested” (Durose, Cooper, and Howard). This statistic proves that there is a significant chance that a criminal will indeed carry out the same action as before. The most significant way that an offender is punished is through what…

    • 207 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The death penalty is used universally, in developed countries, as well as, in undeveloped countries. The death penalty is used more for retribution and retaliation than it is for justice. The death penalty does not deter crime effectively, it is incompatible with human rights and human dignity, used against minorities and the poor, and there is always the risk of executing innocent people. Its easy to agree to the death penalty when the accused is not someone you know...bu what if the accused was your son, daughter, father, mother, brother, or sister? Would you still be for the death penalty?…

    • 100 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    At some point everyone has heard of torture. It could have been in a movie or on the news, but they have heard of it. In this day and age, people would like to have believed it was all behind us in the past. Then 9/11 happened, everyone’s lives were changed with one simple act of cruelty. Before 9/11 hit the U.S. in a wave of pain, panic, and anger, our viewpoints on torture would probably have been less likely that it should be allowed. The decision to torture people who are suspected of being part of terrorist groups has always been decided by the government, for the simple reason that it is required to keep us safe from harm. Some people believe that torture is cruel, unsightly and just inhumane. On the other hand there are people who see it the same way but also believe it could be necessary in extreme circumstances. We’re going to look at two different points of torture: When it is acceptable and when it is not acceptable.…

    • 886 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Utilitarianism assumes that it would be morally correct for me to employ the water boarding technique on this possibly innocent man if it meant obtaining possible anti-terrorist information that could possibly save thousands of innocent Americans. The ‘greatest good for the greatest number’, so they say, but is torture really the best way to obtain the best consequence? I will use my take on the Just War model and J.J.C Smarts’ suggestion to focus on all consequences of a situation to argue against the notion that water torture would be morally ethical and the right thing that I ought to do.…

    • 712 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    If torture is used in retaliation and as an “eye to eye” concept, then torture would be an unethical way of punishing someone (Guidebook). For this example, I would argue that torture is being used to provide the members with the realization for their actions, so torture is an unethical way of punishment. Also, torture is not a replacement for the death penalty, so it is not saving an individual’s life because in the guidebook it states that if “torture is vengeful and not being used to protect innocent lives, then it is not technically a moral reason for punishing someone” (Guidebook). Without protecting innocent lives, torture cannot be considered an ethical reason for punishing someone, so I would argue that the type of punishment that should be used is an elongated amount of jail time. Incarceration meets all the requirements for being a moral type of punishment because it doesn't cause mental harm that torture would and incarcerating the members would not be a retaliating…

    • 1062 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Considering terrorist attacks that harm or potentially kill at least thousand(s) of people, torture may seem justifiable. Torture, defined in these instances as physically non-lethal, has been generally used to extract information from terrorists that may lead to the prevention of massive terrorist attack.…

    • 696 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    When it comes to the topic of torture, most of us will readily agree that torturing someone in order to get information is not the answer. Where this agreement usually ends, however, is on the question of how guilty a person is, and what should be done in the case of a bombing. On the one hand, people argue that torture is unconstitutional and should not be practiced because it questions a person’s morality and what they are willing to do in order to get results. On the other hand, however, others argue that we should allow torture because it is more just than allowing thousands of innocents to die because we didn’t want to question a single person. I have mixed feelings on the topic. While I recognize that our actions may be for the greater good, we cannot allow ourselves to lose our morality because of it. I do not believe that a person should be tortured for information unless it is under specific circumstances. What I mean by this is that people should not torture someone unless that person is obviously guilty or it is…

    • 1284 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There are many questions relating to the use of torture against any person whatsoever. As such, there are different perspectives on the ethics of its usage as well. While some believe that the use of torture becomes necessary at times, others believe that whatever the circumstances are, torture can never be justified. Some very pertinent issues related to the use of torture are, “Suppose a child has been kidnapped and a person has been suspected of committing the crime. Is it justifiable to torture that person in order to try to extract information from him about the child? Now suppose the person would not react at all if he is subjected to torture but there is a chance that he would divulge information if his child of the similar age as the…

    • 545 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The information that is acquired through the use of torture is often time sensitive. A common question that is debated is, “should a terrorist be tortured if they hold information that will prevent a ticking bomb from detonating in a metropolitan area?” In this scenario, torturing the terrorist is the only way to prevent the bomb from exploding. Without question, the lives of the thousands of innocent Americans in danger far outweigh the life of the terrorist. Although we do not intend to kill the suspect when we torture him, this always remains a possibility if they do not comply. The suspect should be tortured until he reveals the location of the bomb because the only reason we value his life is to disarm the bomb. If the explosion were to…

    • 544 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Ethics Of Torture

    • 380 Words
    • 2 Pages

    “Physical torture can affect the brain, too. But by itself, “psychological torture undermines the very ability to think, and it doesn’t leave any marks.”- Psychologist Steven Reisner. One of the many techniques the government uses to interrogate mainly terrorist is a form of torture to get them to give up information. They use techniques such as waterboarding, rectal feeding and hydration, confinement in boxes, using cold water beating, threats, etc. Using torture is very uncommon, it is only used in rare and extreme situations. Torture is not used to kill suspects, but instead a quick way to get information from those who are being interrogated. I believe that torture should not be used under any circumstances to get information. Instead they should find others means to get what they need.…

    • 380 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Arguments Against Torture

    • 552 Words
    • 3 Pages

    It’s safe to say that torture may be one of the worst experiences that can happen to a human being. I know that if I were a situation where my options were being tortured to death or being put to death quickly, I would choose the quick death every time. The issue at hand is whether we should be allowed to torture terrorists for information or not. While most people have probably already formed their own opinion on the matter, it may not be as cut and dry as they first thought once they hear the argument from both sides.…

    • 552 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Kurt Kumili once said, “Having [been a prosecutor] now for nearly 12 years, I have seen time and time and time again kids who were lost causes turn their lives around”. The decisions we make as teenagers shouldn’t define us for the rest of our lives. The severity of juvenile punishment should be lessened. Tax money can be put towards counseling, behavior classes, and community service instead of a juvenile facility. The court system should also make the maximum sentencing for juveniles ten years. Lastly, the court systems should eliminate trying juveniles as adults. Even though all crimes should be punished, there should be a decadence in the severity of juvenile punishments.…

    • 672 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This translates over to those doing the torture and those against it. Those that conduct the torture believe that they are obtaining valuable information where as those that oppose it see it as a large violation of human rights.…

    • 286 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays