Preview

The Negative Effects of Cohabitation

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1110 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Negative Effects of Cohabitation
Running Head: THE NEGATIVE EFFECTS OF COHABITATION

The Negative Effects of Cohabitation
University of Phoenix

The Negative Effects of Cohabitation
In today modern society with such high rate of divorce, many people are turning to cohabitation. With the 2000 census reporting 5.5 million cohabiting couples , up 3.2 million from 1990 ( Simmons & O’Connell, 2003), it is clear that cohabitation is a trend that needs to be further examined. Cohabitation is viewed as an attractive alternative or a stepping stone to marriage. Cohabiting partners share the belief that living together will be a way to test their compatibility. Premarital cohabitation works like test driving a car before signing the binding contract and leaving the dealership. But will you leave the dealership with a successful purchase and no regrets? Or will it be a purchase that never occurred because the test drive was not as smooth as expected? Although experts agree that “common sense suggests that premarital cohabitation should provide an opportunity for couples to learn about each other, strengthen their bonds and increase their chances for a successful marriage” (Smock, 2000, p. 6), research proves that cohabitation does not lead to a better relationship. In the contrary, cohabitation creates an unstable environment that is detrimental to the relationship and to the foundation of family. Many believe that living together before officially ‘tying the knot’ would lower the risk of divorce because by living together couples are learning more about each . As indicated in a survey by the National Survey of Families and Households, 50% of those who cohabit do so because they feel it is a way to ensure compatibility (Smock, 2000). The truth is, that the “idea that marriages preceded by cohabitation are more stable has received close to no empirical support” (Svarer, 2004, p. 524). In contrary, research has proved the complete opposite of this idea. Nock’s study in 1995 specifically found that



References: Harms, W. (2002). Research looks at cohabitation’s negative effects. The University of Chicago Chronicles, 19(11) Nock, S. L. (1995). A comparison of marriages and cohabiting relationships. Journal of Family Issues, 16(1), 53-76. Simmons, T., & O’Connell M Smock, P. J. (2000). Cohabitation in the united states: An appraisal of research themes, findings, and implications. Annual Review of Sociology, 26, 1-20. Stafford, L., Kline, S Svarer, M. (2004). Is your love in vain? another look at premarital cohabitation and divorce. The Journal of Human Resources, 39(2), 523-535. Woods, L

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Cited: Grover, Sam. "Similarities Between Cohabitation & Marriage | EHow." EHow. Demand Media, 15 June 2011. Web. 14 July 2013.…

    • 826 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Cohabitation Before Marriage

    • 2513 Words
    • 11 Pages

    Barbara Markey (1999) notes three groups of cohabiters; those headed toward marriage, those cohabiting as a temporary alternative, and those cohabiting as a permanent alternative to marriage. Roland Johnson, a university sociologist, describes four categories of cohabiters. Theses sum up the vast majority of cohabitating relationships found among college-age individuals. They are: Linus Blanket, Emancipation, Convenience and Testing Relationships (Johnson 1996). A brief description of each is:…

    • 2513 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    As stated in our text, various factors can bind married couples together, such as economic interdependencies, legal, social and moral constraints, relationship, and amongst other things. In the recent years some of these factors have diminished their strengths. The modern generation sees marriage in a different perspective altogether. Individuals today feel they are stable independently, they do not need to rely on their spouse for emotional or financial support. Many are career driven and soar to conquer their dreams over settling down with a family. Such untraditional views have increased divorce rates.…

    • 740 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Cohabiting couples cannot just live their lives satisfied, comfortable, and in a better financial position, also their kids can live comfortably with a good role model. Meg Jay, author of “The Downside of Cohabiting before Marriage” points out a great fact about marriage that contradicts Doe’s definition of how easy to get divorce. Jay shows the difficulty of getting out of marriage when she says, “Lock-in is the decreased likelihood to search for, or change to, another option once an investment in something has been made.” (Jay, 251). Even though she points out a great point about marriage being the right kind of relationship if someone wants a long-term commitment, it can also harm the parents and their future child in the long run. To elaborate…

    • 277 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Some Cited: Cohabitation in the United States. Wikipedia, 17 Sept. 2012. Web. 1 Oct. 2012.…

    • 825 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Divorce Rates in America

    • 1349 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Nock, Steven L. "America 's Divorce Problem." Society 36.4 (1999): 43-52. Academic Search Premier. EBSCO. Web. 19 Apr. 2011.…

    • 1349 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Identify and explain two reasons for an increase in cohabitation [17] One reason is changing social attitudes. Religion regarded cohabitation as ‘living in sin’, but today there is less shame attached to it. Barlow et al found increasing acceptance of cohabitation. This shows that the change in religions social attitude, cohabitation is accepted more, leading to an increase in cohabitation. Some people prefer love that focuses of on intimacy, closeness and emotion rather than the duties of marriage. Giddens argues that there has been a trend towards confluent love. This love focuses on the intimacy, closeness and emotion of a relationship, rather than the feelings of obligation and duty that is in vows at marriage. When a marriage no longer has confluent love, the relationship is likely to end. This shows that monogamy may start being replaced by serial monogamy, in which cohabitation is most suited to. However, the ONS found that 60% of cohabiting couples will eventually end in marriage showing that monogamy can often replace serial monogamy. There is less pressure to follow traditional norms and values. Beck and Beck-Gernshiem argue that individualism has led to changing attitudes towards cohabitation and marriage. There is less pressure to follow the norms and values around love and relationships set by family, religion or culture. This shows that the change in attitudes has led to people making their own decision about whether they marry or cohabitate. The acceptance of sex outside marriage has made it more likely that cohabitation will occur. Allan and Crow argue that effective contraception has made it possible for partners to cohabit without fear of pregnancy. This alongside the acceptance of sex before marriage means cohabitation without marriage is likely to occur. This shows that the change in social attitudes towards sex outside of marriage has led to an increase in cohabitation.…

    • 585 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Whats Eating Gilbert Grape

    • 2238 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Hetherington, E.M. & Kelly, J. (2002). For better or for worse: Divorce reconsidered. NY: W.W. Norton.…

    • 2238 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In analyzing the recent growth of cohabitation he finds that its practice began as a short term method of reducing the possibility of divorce as cohabitation was viewed as a sort of "trial marriage". However, as time has progressed this trial period has been severely lengthened and has less frequently yielded marriages as its outcome. Through cited statistics he shows that while in the 1970's sixty percent of cohabitations resulted in a marriage within three years, that number has been drastically reduced to thirty three percent in the 1990's. Cherlin shows that cohabitation has become so prevalent in the United States that the laws of the country have had to be changed to adapt to this recently developed living situation.…

    • 1198 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Neil does bring in some premises that are relevant to that. Neil brings up some states showing that children born to cohabiting parents experience separation of their parents before the age of “16” at “75%” compared to those married at around “one third” . If it was demonstrated that a separation of parents lead to a negative impacts in a child’s life and behavior then the premise might stand. Unfortunately since so few cohabiting couples decide to have children that the net parent separation rate bellow 16% is probably higher for married couples. Neil states that women are more likely to face “physical and sexual abuse” when living in cohabitation compared to a marriage. Neil fails to bring any stats or proof to that claim or anything thing showing that cohabitation is the cause and not just in correlation. An argument is made that relationships will not be as good as married relationships because the partners will not be “genuine and authentic” due to the thinking that “their partner may bolt at the first sign of trouble.” One could rebut that be not having this security would make both partners put more effort into maintaining the relationship due to the fact that they know their partner can leave much more easily. I find it hard to believe that married people are “emotionally, physically, financially, and vocationally” better off because the apparent studies are not listed and we are not informed in what way those statistics were…

    • 1030 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Cohabitation – Blessing or Destroy the relationship? One of the most dramatic trends of recent years has been the tremendous increase in male-female couples who choose to live together without marrying, a practice called cohabitation. According to the 2000 Census, there are eleven million unmarried people living with an unmarried partner in the United States today, and this number has grown 72% in the last decade alone. While many people like David Popenoe, a Professor of Sociology, on his essay Sociological Reasons Not to Live Together suggests that living together is not a good way to prepare for marriage or to avoid divorce. There is another point of view like an organization called The Alternatives to Marriage Project (AtMP) believes that unmarried relationships should deserve validation and support.…

    • 942 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Nik Weber EN140 5 September, 2012 Summary “Marriage Advocate” In Linda J. Waite’s pro-marriage article “Marriage Matters,” she sheds statistical light on the outweighing positive, as well as the negative, aspects of marriage. From her view, there are four outcomes which are directly affected from marriage opposing including: health, wealth, intimacy with your spouse, and, of course, the children. These four topics are the areas most affected (positive or negatively) by living single, married, cohabitating, or rebuilt lifestyles.…

    • 707 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A fear of divorce is also something heavily influencing trends in both marriage and cohabitation. Young people, having perhaps experienced parental divorce are feared of entering into a commitment that they are simply not sure about, this sometimes seems like a reasonable thing to do considering the high divorce rate, a third of marriages currently ending in divorce. This would of course increase cohabitation as more and more people wish to enter into what Chester deems a ‘trial marriage’, to ensure marital…

    • 680 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Boundaries; A Case Study

    • 1799 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Leber, B., Markman, H., Stanley, S., St. Peters, M. (1995). Strengthening marriages and preventing divorce: New directions in prevention research. Family Relations, 44,…

    • 1799 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The 20th century has been the scene of rapid social change. Educational, political, economic and religious institutions have been changing and morphing as the century progressed. These institutional changes have impacted individuals and families in dramatic ways. Gender roles have changed, family mobility has increased, fertility has declined and union formation patterns have become more fluid and less stable (Morrison, 2015). Over the past 40 years cohabitation has moved from being viewed as a deviant form of union formation to the preferred social norm as a transition from dating to marriage. Cohabitation is when a couple lives together for an extended period as if they were married, but is not a legal agreement. Many couples that are planning…

    • 268 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays

Related Topics