Preview

The Island of Dr. Moreau

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
643 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Island of Dr. Moreau
In 1896 H. G. Wells had the first edition of “ The Island of Dr. Moreau” published. The book took place primarily on an island in the Pacific Ocean. On this island Dr. Moreau and his assistant ( Montgomery) performed dangerous, secret experiments on humans and animals. When Wells wrote this he knew nothing about DNA, cloning, or chromosomes but he did use his scientific imagination. Wells realized that society was beginning to rely on science too much in the late nineteenth century. He wrote this book to issue a stern warning for future societies against their own scientific advancements. He knew that just like his society others will want to quench their appetite for this tasty treat called vivisection or cloning. He knew that eventually the progress of society would lead to the all or nothing control of the evolutionary processes. This brings me to one of Wells’ most important ideas that he wanted to tell his readers. That was the idea of vivisection or cloning of humans and animals. In today's world we are trying to control evolution by furthering our studies into cloning. He was right about his expectations of future societies and his ideas about how scientific advancements would affect our world. It was different because when this book was published it got horrific reviews for being too outlandish with its views on society. I think that if the book was published today it would be raved as a good warning for all the cloning scientists. Today we can actually say that we can clone things and it is more of a reality than it was in 1896. This change has been so dramatic that Barnes and Noble would have had to take the book off the science-fiction shelves and onto the non-fiction shelves. It has created a whole new atmosphere in which to read this book one in such Wells predicted by writing this book. Wells would be disappointed at our disregard of his warning. Another important theme that Wells tried to convey to us was

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The Island of Dr. Moreau tells the story of strange and horrifying events witnessed by Edward Prendick, an English gentleman who unfortunately gets left by an annoyed captain, after being rescued from the sinking ship, on the Pacific island of Dr. Moreau. Once on the island Prendick is warned to only stay on certain parts of the land. He forgoes the warnings and tries to escape into the jungle anyway when he hears painful screams. During his stay on the mysterious island Prendick discovers Moreau is performing creepy experiments by using vivisection to turn animals into humans.…

    • 466 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Van Dijck, J. (1999). Cloning humans, cloning literature: genetics and the imagination deficit. New Genetics & Society, 18(1), 9.…

    • 1944 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Law, like in any civilized society, greatly molded the behavior and characteristics of the Beast Men on the island of Doctor Moreau. They viewed law as more then that, they viewed it similarly to how one may view religion, with Moreau as the deity. The Beast Men had these rules prearranged in their minds by Moreau during their creation. Essentially their law is what prevents them from retreating into their natural, savage selves; it’s what essentially gives them their human qualities.…

    • 965 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    While this genetic technology has raised many criticisms, Jeremy Rifkin is one who stands firm against this techno-utopia. Rifkin, the author of The Biotech Century, believes that this new technology is unprecedented while it poses gave risks to human health. He also believes that cloning and genetic engineering are unnatural and should not be done. The Nazi idea of the superman is very much alive today but in a new form, in Rafkin’s view. This results in the illusion of the “perfect child.” Lee Silver highly disagrees with the views of Jeremy Rifkin. (818)…

    • 850 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    David Baltimore’s written work of Limiting Science: A Biologist’s Perspective discusses the controversy of research in molecular biology and its limitless freedom, disputing there should be freedom in which direction science heads, but the public should decide the pace at which it goes. Baltimore first begins his argument with the discussion of how molecular biology began. It was born from individual sciences where attempts at trying to solve the mysteries in these fields led to the realization that the answers lied in genetics. Advances in the field are what really are at the heart of this discussion though. The most critical one is the development of recombinant DNA where DNA can be multiplied for an indefinite period, but the potential of this process has scared some scientists, even Baltimore himself, about unforeseen events. This led to even more unsettling questions that inevitably hurt the field of genetics, which Baltimore goes on to explain that the dangers have been blown out of proportion. The most common subject that comes to discussion through these fears is genetic engineering. Baltimore delves into the two techniques for altering imperfect genes, and then raises two questions that normally pop up. Who gets to decide what genes get altered and how will they decide it will be done? For Baltimore this presents a dilemma of both ethics and morals and thus presents the real problem at heart. To clarify the argument against recombinant DNA research Baltimore presents to the reader similar arguments. After he gives us the danger of actively researching genetic engineering, Baltimore flips the coin and argues the danger of restricting it. His theory is that the criterion used to decide how science should be handled reflects a dominant principle of governing. This should not be allowed to control scientific advances nor should science be the servant to this ideology, mainly because of the repercussions on society it could…

    • 529 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Yes, Huxley’s vision of cloning differ from the actual techniques that science has developed since…

    • 2162 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    With the development of genetic modification scientists have created a chicken that has a dinosaur leg in a reverse evolution experiment, a goat that produces spider silk, featherless chicken, glow in the dark cats, sheep and monkeys and recently in February 2016 British scientists were granted permission to genetically modify human embryos. Just as Etienne Geoffroy St. Hilaire and his son Isidore Geoffroy St. Hilaire created malformations in chicken embryos, scientists in the 21st century are creating malformations in animals in the name of science – for “the good” of human beings. Wherever a person situates themselves in time, whether it is in the 18th century or 21st century, people need to understand that there will always be consequences for what we choose to do with the knowledge we gain. Knowledge can create and knowledge can destroy- both in the physical realm and in the moral realm. Morally speaking, knowledge can change how individuals (and collectively human beings) view themselves in the world and how individuals view other animals and material things in the…

    • 1710 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Over the years, science and technology have expanded to make it possible to create identical creatures. While new cloning technology is a great advancement, it raises a plethora of moral and ethical questions. Cloning may bring about new ways to find cures for babies, according to Philip M. Boffey, but cloning also “could usher in a new eugenics”. The problems produced from the prospect of cloning greatly outweigh the benefits.…

    • 686 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Determining what is ethical and what is not ethical can rely heavily on possible consequences. The author of “Frankenstein” displays this in the novel. The novel “Frankenstein” is about a how a man named Victor Frankenstein discovers the secret of bringing life into an inanimate object, by robbing body parts and creating a monster. This monster seeks revenge on his creator, as well as the society because society rejected him. The main part of this essay is to compare a real world bioethical issue to the events of “Frankenstein”. The novel has a direct relationship with real world cloning because many see this as a wrong in the human society, both in the book and in the real world.…

    • 795 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In the novel Frankenstein, author Mary Shelley suggests that when science is not used responsibly by man, it can become out of control. Mary Shelley warns readers of the dangers that come with the advancement of technology and the potential risks that emerge when science is raised godlike standards. Today, science and technology are advancing much more rapidly than is our wisdom to use them properly. Due to this, science and technology are becoming the equivalent of modern day ‘monsters’. Reproductive cloning on humans is a prominent scientific and technological advancement that poses issues regarding human control and manipulation over the natural world and morality. With these advancements come risks. The main risk being that reproductive…

    • 1748 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    While the author does use parallels so that the reader can relate to the text, the author also estranges the reader from the idea of humans being the superior species. Through this estrangement the reader can see that the medical ethics in play, when referring to eugenics and genetic engineering, are in jeopardy as many people…

    • 494 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Thesis Statement: Although human cloning is a scientific discovery of great significance which is the creation of a genetically identical copy of a human it has some medical advantages; however, it raises high debates because of its religious, ethical, and scientific disadvantages.…

    • 412 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    H.G. Wells, in writing the novel The Island of Dr. Moreau, used many literary techniques, which implied the world was imperfect, and at the same time suggested some ways of improving it. By revealing to the reader all the faults and fallacies of the world through the plot, characters, and other issues presented, we can look the other way, and see a far better world than the essentially satanic world our own world has become.…

    • 1468 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Human cloning has been a significant theme in Science Fiction for many years, with its portrayal often being that of negative or ‘evil’ influence. Although the term ‘clone’ was never used within the novel, one of the first Science Fiction works about human cloning is Aldous Huxley’s ‘Brave New World’, which depicts a world in which human reproduction has been manipulated and babies are grown in…

    • 1194 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Should Cloning Be Banned

    • 604 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The subject of human cloning is a very controversial topic. The cloning of Dolly the sheep in 1997 by scientist Ian Wilmut generated a very unexpected reaction around the world. However these reactions were not all positive. Cloning refers to the development of offspring that are identical to their parents genetically. While it is referred to as an unnatural process, it can occur quite often in nature. Identical twins, for example, are clones. However, human cloning is very new and very complex. In this essay I will examine both sides of the argument into the banning of cloning starting with reasons why cloning should not be banned.…

    • 604 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics