The Indian Removal Act's Contribution To The Civil War

Have you ever made a trade that was fair to you, but unfair to someone else or vice versa. Well, you're not the only one. On May 28, 1830 there was an act signed that stated that the Congress and Government could trade and negotiate for their land in return for the land on the west side of the Mississippi River. John Ross a Cherokee chief, Andrew Jackson the president, and the congress were all involved in the signing of this act. The Congress and the other people involved on the government side wanted the land because they had more access to it and had better quality than the previous land. “The bold effort the president Central Bank had made to control the government… are but premonitions of the fate that await the American people should they be deluded
The Indian removal act was significant to American history because of the removal of Native American territory for usage of the government. The Indian removal act lead to the civil war because it broke the treaty between the native Americans and the government about no more communication over land, which made the north very
This was a very big example of false trading where you do not get equal sides of the trade. This is a huge factor when it comes to the Civil War because of these significant reasons. The Indian removal act caused so much stir up in the north, south and in the government that it lead to the Civil War. The Indian removal act was significant to American history and it led to the Civil War. The Indian removal act was significant to American history because of the removal of Native American territory for usage of the government. The Indian removal act lead to the civil war because it broke the treaty between the native Americans and the government about no more communication over land, which made the north very